Methods of obtaining working or study models of children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review




Dental models; Intraoral scanning; Material dental impression; Children; Cleft lip; Cleft palate.


Objective: The aim of this study was to know the different methods used to obtain working or study models of children with cleft lip and palate. Materials and methods: A review of the literature was carried out to compile information on methods of obtaining working or study models of children with cleft lip and palate, for which an electronic search was carried out in various databases such as PubMed, Taylor and Francis, Pesquisa, Web of Science, Proquest, Scopus, Springer, Epistemonikos, Google Scholar and Ovid, applying inclusion and exclusion filters. Results: A first screening was performed leaving 180 articles; after this selection, duplicate bibliography was eliminated, leaving 145 articles, subsequently, all records were verified and 21 studies that did not meet the selection criteria were excluded, resulting in 25 articles suitable for this literature review. Conclusions: Through time, different materials and methods have been used to obtain study or work models in patients with cleft lip and palate in order to find new ways for the treatment, planning and intervention of the same condition; thus, knowing each one of them would facilitate their application with the aim of improving the quality and warmth in which the treatment is carried out, in addition, it is important to develop comprehensive treatments with effectiveness and efficiency, which will only be possible with adequate records of each patient.


Allori, A. C., Mulliken, J. B., Meara, J. G., Shusterman, S., & Marcus, J. R. (2017). Classification of Cleft Lip/Palate: Then and Now. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal : Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 54(2), 175–188.

Alois, C. I., & Ruotolo, R. A. (2020). An overview of cleft lip and palate. JAAPA : Official Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 33(12), 17–20.

Asquith, J. A., & McIntyre, G. T. (2012). Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 49(5), 530–534.

Azhari, M., el Hawari, W., Rokhssi, H., Merzouk, N., & Bentahar, O. (2021). Description of Nasoalveolar Molding Process in Neonatal Period of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Step by Step. Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences.

Bittermann, G. K. P., de Ruiter, A. P., Janssen, N. G., Bittermann, A. J. N., van der Molen, A. M., van Es, R. J. J., Rosenberg, A. J. W. P., & Koole, R. (2016). Management of the premaxilla in the treatment of bilateral cleft of lip and palate: what can the literature tell us? In Clinical Oral Investigations (Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 207–217). Springer Verlag.

Burcu Nur Yılmaz, R., Çakan, D. G., Altay, M., & Canter, H. ibrahim. (2019). Reliability of measurements on plaster and digital models of patients with a cleft lip and palate. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 32(2), 65–71.

Chalmers, E. V., McIntyre, G. T., Wang, W., Gillgrass, T., Martin, C. B., & Mossey, P. A. (2016). Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care: Which is superior? Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 53(5), 568–577.

Crockett, D. J., & Goudy, S. L. (2014). Cleft lip and palate. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 22(4), 573–586.

Dalessandri, D., Tonni, I., Laffranchi, L., Migliorati, M., Isola, G., Bonetti, S., Visconti, L., & Paganelli, C. (2019). Evaluation of a digital protocol for pre-surgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in newborn patients: A pilot study. Dentistry Journal, 7(4).

Dinu, C., Almășan, O., Hedeșiu, M., Armencea, G., Băciuț, G., Bran, S., Opriș, D., Văcăraș, S., Iștoan, V., & Băciuț, M. (2022). The usefulness of cone beam computed tomography according to age in cleft lip and palate. Journal of Medicine and Life, 15(9), 1136–1142.

El-Ashmawi, N. A., Fayed, M. M. S., El-Beialy, A., & Attia, K. H. (2022). Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM) Using Grayson Method Versus Computer-Aided Design NAM (CAD/NAM) in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 59(3), 377–389.

Fomenko, I., Maslak, E., Timakov, I., & Tsoy, T. (2019). Use of virtual 3D-model for the assessment of premaxilla position in 3-4-year-olds with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate - A pilot study. Proceedings - International Conference on Developments in ESystems Engineering, DeSE, October-2019, 933–938.

Jamayet, N., Rahman, A., Nizami, M. M. U., Mohamed, W., & Alam, M. (2018). A Novel Method of Obtaining Impression from Three dimensionally Printed Skull and Incorporating Medical Grade Silicone Elastomer in Fabricating Silicone Palatal Feeding Obturators for Cleft Lip and Palate Cases. Journal of International Oral Health, 10(1), 40–43.

Kalaskar, R., Bhaje, P., Balasubramanian, S., & Kalaskar, A. (2021). Effectiveness of the novel impression tray “cleftray” for infants with cleft lip and palate: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 47(2), 82–90.

Kalaskar, R. R., & Kk, K. (2021). Comparative evaluation of digital and tray impression technique as a method of recording anatomical details of cleft lip and palate in neonates-protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial (Vol. 25). http://annalsofrscb.ro17318

Krey, K. F, R. A. M. P. H. M. R. S. K. B. (2018). Fully digital workflow for presurgical orthodoctic plate in cleft lip and palate patients. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 21(3), 251–259.

Lewis, C. W., Jacob, L. S., & Lehmann, C. U. (2017). The Primary Care Pediatrician and the Care of Children With Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate. Pediatrics, 139(5).

Martin, C. B., Chalmers, E. V., McIntyre, G. T., Cochrane, H., & Mossey, P. A. (2015). Orthodontic scanners: What’s available? Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 136–143.

Okazaki, T., Kawanabe, H., & Fukui, K. (2022). Comparison of conventional impression making and intraoral scanning for the study of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Congenital Anomalies.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In The BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group.

Passucci Ambrosio Eloá Cristina, S. C. C. C. C. A. M. M. M. M. O. T. (2021). Innovate method to assess maxillary arch morphology in oral cleft: 3d-ed superimposition technique. Brazilian Dental Journal, 32(2), 37–44.

Patel, J., Winters, J., & Walters, M. (2019). Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for a Neonate With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 56(8), 1120–1123.

Pillai, S., Upadhyay, A., Khayambashi, P., Farooq, I., Sabri, H., Tarar, M., Lee, K. T., Harb, I., Zhou, S., Wang, Y., & Tran, S. D. (2021). Dental 3d-printing: Transferring art from the laboratories to the clinics. In Polymers (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 1–25). MDPI AG.

Ritschl, L. M., Roth, M., Fichter, A. M., Mittermeier, F., Kuschel, B., Wolff, K. D., Grill, F. D., & Loeffelbein, D. J. (2018). The possibilities of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system in neonates: A prospective growth analysis and analysis of accuracy. Head and Face Medicine, 14(1).

Salazar-Gamarra, R., Seelaus, R., da Silva, J. V. L., da Silva, A. M., & Dib, L. L. (2016). Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: A method for making facial prostheses. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 45(1).

Shujaat, S., Riaz, M., & Jacobs, R. (2022). Synergy between artificial intelligence and precision medicine for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgical planning. In Clinical Oral Investigations. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH.

Taib, B. G., Taib, A. G., Swift, A. C., & van Eeden, S. (2015). Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management. British Journal of Hospital Medicine (London, England : 2005), 76(10), 584–591.

Thurzo, A., Šufliarsky, B., Urbanová, W., Čverha, M., Strunga, M., & Varga, I. (2022). Pierre Robin Sequence and 3D Printed Personalized Composite Appliances in Interdisciplinary Approach. Polymers, 14(18).

Xepapadeas, A. B., Weise, C., Frank, K., Spintzyk, S., Poets, C. F., Wiechers, C., Arand, J., & Koos, B. (2020). Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - Part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21. BMC Oral Health, 20(1).

Zarean, P., Zarean, P., Thieringer, F. M., Mueller, A. A., Kressmann, S., Erismann, M., Sharma, N., & Benitez, B. K. (2022). A Point-of-Care Digital Workflow for 3D Printed Passive Presurgical Orthopedic Plates in Cleft Care. Children, 9(8).

Zeidan, M., & Kamiloğlu, B. (2021). Three-dimensional imaging technique to compare digital impression CEREC Omnicam intraoral camera (CAD) and tri-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography, to measure maxillary casts: Unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate up to 6 months of age, applied in nanotechnology. Applied Nanoscience (Switzerland).

Zhu, S., Yang, Y., Gu, M., & Khambay, B. (2016). A comparison of three viewing media for assessing dental arch relationships in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 53(5), 578–583.



How to Cite

LOJANO ORTEGA, T. V. .; RAMOS MONTIEL, R. R. Methods of obtaining working or study models of children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. e1412239912, 2023. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i2.39912. Disponível em: Acesso em: 20 may. 2024.



Review Article