High-power diode laser for second-stage implant surgery: a randomized pilot clinical trial

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4122

Keywords:

Dental implants; Lasers; Oral surgery

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the conventional scalpel technique and the use of a high-power diode laser for second-stage implant surgery. For that, fifteen patients were randomly assigned to receive either the conventional scalpel technique (Control Group, n = 7) or a diode laser-assisted technique (Laser Group, n = 8) for second-stage surgery of submerged dental implants placed at bone level. The local anesthetic amount required, and the total surgical time was determined just after surgery. Local pain, peri-implant mucosa status, and bleeding were assessed at the end of the surgery and after 7 and 15 days. Information on the need for postoperative pain medication on the first day and during the next two weeks was also gathered. The surgical time was significantly shorter in the Laser Group (P = 0.001) and only the Control Group presented bleeding at the end of surgery and on the seventh day (P = <0.001, P = 0.026). The other evaluations did not show differences between the groups. Within the limitations of the present pilot study and in comparison to clinical outcomes of the conventional scalpel technique, the use of a high-power diode laser seems to be slightly advantageous for the second-stage implant surgery.

References

Al-Delayme, R. M. A. (2019). Preservation of keratinized gingiva around dental implants using a diode laser when uncovering implants for second stage surgery. European Oral Research, 53(3), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20190022

Anderson, J. A. M., Brewer, A., Creagh, D., Hook, S., Mainwaring, J., McKernan, A., Yee, T. T., & Yeung, C. A. (2013). Guidance on the dental management of patients with haemophilia and congenital bleeding disorders. British Dental Journal, 215(10), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1097

Arnabat-Domínguez, J., Bragado-Novel, M., España-Tost, A. J., Berini-Aytés, L., & Gay-Escoda, C. (2010). Advantages and esthetic results of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium- gallium-garnet laser application in second-stage implant surgery in patients with insufficient gingival attachment: A report of three cases. Lasers in Medical Science, 25(3), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0728-6

Bajaj, S., Rani, S., Issar, G., Sethi, U., Kumar, S., & Mishra, S. (2020). Comparative evaluation of crestal bone levels around endosseous implants as influenced by conventional and diode laser during second-stage surgery in mandibular implant-supported overdenture: An in vivo study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 20(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_55_19

El-Kholey, K. E. (2014). Efficacy and safety of a diode laser in second-stage implant surgery: A comparative study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(5), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.003

Fornaini, C., Merigo, E., Vescovi, P., Bonanini, M., Antonietti, W., Leoci, L., Lagori, G., & Meleti, M. (2015). Different laser wavelengths comparison in the second-stage implant surgery: an ex vivo study. Lasers in Medical Science, 30(6), 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1623-3

Kaur, M., Sharma, Y. D., Singh, P., Sharma, S., & Wahi, A. (2018). Comparative evaluation of efficacy and soft tissue wound healing using diode laser (810 nm) versus conventional scalpel technique for second-stage implant surgery. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 22(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_46_17

Matys, J., & Dominiak, M. (2016). Assessment of pain when uncovering implants with Er:YAG laser or scalpel for second stage surgery. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 25(6), 1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/62456

Świder, K., & Marzena, D. (2019). Er:YAG and diode laser application in implant bed preparation and implant uncovering: A case report. Dental and Medical Problems, 56(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/100386

Tunc, S. K., Yayli, N. Z., Talmac, A. C., Feslihan, E., & Akbal, D. (2019). Clinical comparison of the use of er, cr: Ysgg and diode lasers in second stage implant surgery. Saudi Medical Journal, 40(5), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.5.24105

Downloads

Published

05/05/2020

How to Cite

GRIGIO, G. da S.; TATENO, R. Y.; PALMA, L. F.; SHITSUKA, C.; SENDYK, W. R.; CAMPOS, L. High-power diode laser for second-stage implant surgery: a randomized pilot clinical trial. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e128974122, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4122. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4122. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 7

Section

Health Sciences

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.