Democracy and the environment: a bibliometric study of scientific production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4311Keywords:
Green Democracy; Ecological Democracy; Sustainable Democracy; Environmental Democracy; Bibliometrics.Abstract
The negative environmental impacts resulting from different human activities, especially those of an economic nature, have led different spheres such as the State, private initiative and civil society to jointly seek solutions to environmental problems and reduce their impact on the social fabric, as well as the understanding that such solutions may be related to democracy. Thus, these factors have aroused the interest of the academy in contributing to the maturing of the discussion on the relationship between democracy and the environment. This study aims to conduct a bibliometric study of scientific production that deals with the relationship between the environment and democracy, which has been produced in the literature by the terms: green democracy, ecological, sustainable and environmental democracy. For this purpose, the methodological path adopted was the bibliometric procedure in the mapping of the productions published, between 1944 and 2019, in the international databases Scopus and Web of Science, and counted on the support of the software VOSviewer® version 1.6.11 and the interpretative analysis, to make the analysis of the 118 articles considered. The nine clusters identified include 18 authors with at least 29 citations, each cluster presents a small number of papers and authors and does not maintain links between them, which results in a relatively high dispersion of publications, however, one point in common can be noted: participation, even if approached in different ways.
References
Abadia, L., & Carvalho, M. (2018). Sustentabilidade na literatura de Gestão de Projetos: temas centrais, tendências e lacunas. Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas, 13(4), 52. doi:https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v13i4.1971
Acselrad, H.et al.(2012). Desigualdade ambiental e acumulação por espoliação: o que está em jogo na questão ambiental?. Coletivo Brasileiro de Pesquisadores da Desigualdade Ambiental. e-cadernos CES, n. 17.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1138
Acselrad, H. (2010). Ambientalização das lutas sociais - o caso do movimento por justiça ambiental. Estudos Avançados, 24(68), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000100010
Arias-Maldonado, M. (2000). The democratisation of sustainability: The search for a green democratic model. Environmental Politics, 9 (4), pp. 43-58.
Arias-Maldonado, M. (2007). An imaginary solution? the green defence of deliberative democracy. Environmental Values, 16(2), 233-252, doi:10.3197/096327107780474573
Armiero, M., & D'Alisa, G. (2012). Rights of resistance: The garbage struggles for environmental justice in campania, Italy. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 23(4), 52-68. doi:10.1080/10455752.2012.724200
Baquero, M. (2008). Democracia formal, cultura política informal e capital social no Brasil. Opinão Publica, Campinas, v. 14, n. 2, p. 380-413. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762008000200005.
Bangura, Y. (1992). Authoritarian rule and democracy in Africa: a theoretical discourse Authoritarianism, democracy, and adjustment, UNRISD (ISSN: 1012-6511), pp. 39-82.
Barros-Platiau, A. F.; Varella, M. D.; & Schleicher, R. T. (2004). Meio ambiente e relações internacionais: perspectivas teóricas, respostas institucionais e novas dimensões de debate. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 47(2), 100-130. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292004000200004
Burnell, P. (2001). The party system and party politics in zambia: Continuities past, present and future. African Affairs, 100(399), 239-263. doi:10.1093/afraf/100.399.239
Bursztyn, M. A., & Bursztyn, M. (2013). Fundamentos de política e gestão ambiental: caminhos para a sustentabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.
Caro, M.; Romero, E.; Espinosa, M.; & Guerrero, C. (2020). Evaluando contribuciones de usabilidad en soluciones TIC-IOT para la agricultura: Una perspectiva desde la bibliometría. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, Apr 2020, Issue E28, pp.681-692.
Carty, V., & Onyett, J. (2006). Protest, Cyberactivism and New Social Movements: The Reemergence of the Peace Movement Post 9/11. Social Movement Studies, 5(3), 229–249. doi:10.1080/14742830600991586
Culkin, M. L. (1944). Green Democracy. Educational Forum. Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 299-308. doi:10.1080/00131724409340965.
Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Political and Ecological Communication. Environmental Politics. 4(4), pp. 13-30.
Dryzek, J. S., & Stevenson, H. (2011). Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics. v.70(11), pp. 1865-1874.
Eckersley, R. (2019). Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: Looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics, p. 1-21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1594536
Eckersley, R. (2006). From the liberal to the green democratic state: Upholding autonomy and sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 266-283. doi:10.1504/IJISD.2006.013731
Espinosa, M, Romero, E., Flórez, L., & Guerrero, C. (2020). DANDELION: Propuesta metodológica para recopilación y análisis de información de artículos científicos. Un enfoque desde la bibliometría y la revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, Apr 2020, Issue E28, pp.110-122
Feil, A. A., & Schreiber, D. (2017). Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: desvendando as sobreposições e alcances de seus significados. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 15(3), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395157473.
Gaard, G (2001). Women, water, energy: An ecofeminist approach. Organization and Environment, 14(2), 157-172. doi:10.1177/1086026601142002
Hauser, E. (1999). Ugandan relations with western donors in the 1990s: What impact on democratisation?. Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(4), 621-641. doi:10.1017/S0022278X9900316X
Kishi, K. (2020). Por que o Fator de Impacto é criticado?. Galoá Journal. Disponível em: https://galoa.com.br/blog/por-que-o-fator-de-impacto-e-criticado. Acesso em 26 abr. 2020.
Kothari, A. (2009). Radical ecological democracy: Escaping India's globalization trap.Development, 52 (3), pp. 401-409.
Kothari, A. (2014a). India 2100: Towards Radical Ecological Democracy (2014) Futures, 56, pp. 62-72.
Kothari, A. (2014b). Radical Ecological Democracy: A path forward for India and beyond.Development (Basingstoke), 57 (1), pp. 36-45.
Kothari, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2014). Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy.Development (Basingstoke), 57 (3-4), pp. 362-375.
Lawrence, A., Paudel, K., Barnes, R., & Malla, Y. (2006). Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry. Environmental Conservation, 33(4), 325-334. doi:10.1017/S0376892906003432
Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2017). Técnicas de pesquisa: planejamento e execução de pesquisa, amostragens e técnicas de pesquisa, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. 8. ed. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Marques, L. (2018). Capitalismo e colapso ambiental. 3. ed. São Paulo: Unicamp.
Mattos, P. L. C. L. (2004). “Bibliometria”: a metodologia acadêmica convencional em questão. RAE eletrônica, v. 3, n. 2, p. 280-306.
Medeiros Filho, A. R., & Russo, S. L. (2018). Marcas como um indicador: revisão sistemática e análise bibliométrica da literatura. Biblios: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. N.71, pp.-50-67. DOI 10.5195/biblios.2018.464.
Menteş, S. A. (2019). Online Environmental Activism: The Case of Iğneada Floodplain Forest.SAGE Open, 9(3), 215824401987787. doi:10.1177/2158244019877877.
Morais, L. A. (2017). Conselhos Ambientais: Uma análise do processo de participação de conselheiros municipais no Território Açu-Mossoró–RN. 2017. 204 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Curso de Pós-graduação em Ambiente, Tecnologia e Sociedade, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró.
Nascimento, E. P. (2012). Trajetória da sustentabilidade: do ambiental ao social, do social ao econômico. Estudos Avançados, 26(74), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142012000100005.
Pickering, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Schlosberg, D. (2020). Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracyenvironmentnexus, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22:1, 1-15, DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276.
Pott, C. M., & Estrela, C. C. (2017). Histórico ambiental: desastres ambientais e o despertar de um novo pensamento. Estudos Avançados, 31(89), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.31890021.
Queiroz, E. F. C. (2017). Ciberativismo: a nova ferramenta dos movimentos sociais. Revista Panorama, v. 7, n. 1, p. 2-5.
Severino, A. J. (2018). Metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo: Cortez.
Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., & Chan, K. M. A. (2017). Making sense of environmental values: A typology of concepts. Ecology and Society, 22(1). doi:10.5751/ES-08999-220107.
Teixeira, M. L. M, Iwamoto, H. M., & Medeiros, A. L. (2013). Estudos Bibliométricos (?) em Administração: discutindo a transposição de finalidade. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro. 14 (3). p. 423–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2013.v14n3.57.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice (pp. 285– 320). London: Springer.
Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ciência da Informação, v. 31, n.2, p. 152-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
