Coach-athlete relationship and associated background factors: an analysis in brazilian coaches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4448

Keywords:

Coach-athlete relationship; Antecedent factors; School youth games.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the antecedent factors associated with the coach athlete relatioship (CART) from the perspective of Brazilian coaches. 182 Brazilian coaches of both sexes, with an average age of 40.47 ± 9.7 years, participating in the 2015 Youth School Games were subjected. As instruments were used: identification form, Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q coach version) and the Basic Needs in Sports Satisfaction Scale (BNSSS). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using Binary Logistic Regression (p <0.05). The results showed that the time of relationship had a significant association (p <0.20) with 3,410 times more likely to have high quality in the affective aspect of CART compared to a shorter time of relationship. The length of the relationship explained 2.927 more chances of occurring the presence of high quality cognitive aspects in periods of relationship over 4 years. It was observed that the time of experience explains in 2,655 more chances the satisfactory relationships, while the autonomy of the trainer explains in 2,589 more chances the presence of the cognitive aspect of the CART. Age and satisfaction of basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence and relationship) were associated with the quality of the commitment in the coach-athlete relationship (p <0.20). It is concluded that factors related to the relationship time, experience time, satisfaction of the basic psychological needs of autonomy and relationships in the sports context are favorable for quality relationships, in the perception of Brazilian coaches.

Author Biography

Paulo Vitor Suto Aizava, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Doutorando pelo Programa associado de Pós graduação em Educação Física UEM/UEL.

References

Burns, M. (2020). The Relationship Between the Coach-Athlete Relationship and Quality of Life Among Paralympic Athletes (Tese de doutorado). Ashford University, San Diego, Califórnia, EUA.

Choi, H., Cho, S., & Huh, J. (2013). The association between the perceived coach–athlete relationship and athletes’ basic psychological needs. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 41(9), 1547-1556.

Contreira, A. R., do Nascimento Junior, J., Caruzzo, N. M., da Costa, L., Gaion, P. A., Melo, S., & Fiorese, L. (2019a). Basic Psychological Needs and Sports Satisfaction Among Brazilian Athletes and Coaches: The Mediating Role of the Dyadic Relationship. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2543.

Contreira, A. R., Nascimento Junior, J. R. A. do, Pizzo, G. C., Sitoe, S. A., Moreira, C. R. , Jowett, S., & Fiorese, L. (2019b). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire for coaches. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14 (3), 285-293.

Davis, L., Jowett, S., & Tafvelin, S. (2019). Communication Strategies: The Fuel for Quality Coach-Athlete Relationships and Athlete Satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2156.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, Personality, and Development within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory. In: ______. The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gullu, S., Keskin, B., Ates, O., & Hanbay, E. (2020). Coach-Athlete Relationship and Sport Passion in Individual Sports. Acta Kinesiologica, 14 (1), 9-15.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. São Paulo: Bookman.

Hernández-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contribuciones al análisis estadístico. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes/IESINFO.

Isoard-Gautheur, S., Trouilloud, D., Gustafsson, H., & Guillet-Descas, E. (2016). Associations between the perceived quality of the coache-athlete relationship and athlete burnout: An examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 201-217.

Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004) The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART -Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245-257.

Jowett, S., & Shanmugam, V. (2016). Relational Coaching in Sport: its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness. In: Schinke, Jr., Mcgannon, Kr, & Smith. B. Routledge International Handbook of Sport Psychology. New York: Routledge.

Jowett, S. (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 154-158.

Jowett, S., & Carpenter, P. (2015). The concept of rules in the coach-athlete relationship. Sports Coaching Review, 4 (1), 1–23;

Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In: J Jowett, S., & Lavalee, D. Social Psychology in Sport. United States: Human Kinetics.

Nascimento Junior, J. R. A., Vissoci, J. R. N, & Vieira, L. F. (2018). Propriedades Psicométricas da Versão Brasileira da Escala de Satisfação das Necessidades Básicas no Esporte (BNSSS). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, e3456.

Ng, J. Y. Y., Lonsdale, C., & Hodge, K. (2011). The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 257-64.

Nicholls, A.R, & Perry, J.A. (2016). Perceptions of coach–athlete relationship are more important to coaches than athletes in predicting dyadic coping and stress appraisals: an actor–partner independence mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 01-12.

Pereira, A.S., Shitsuka, D.M., Parreira, F.J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Acesso em: 16 maio 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao _Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.

Sagar, S. S., & Jowett, S. (2015). Fear of Failure and Self-Control in the Context of Coach-Athlete Relationship Quality. International Journal of Coaching Science, 9 (2), 3-21.

Yang, S. X., Jowett, S., & Chan, D. K. (2015). Effects of Big-Five Personality Traits on the Quality of Relationship and Satisfaction in Chinese Coach-Athlete Dyads. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science Sports, 25 (4), 568-580.

Published

31/05/2020

How to Cite

CONTREIRA, A. R.; CARUZZO, N. M.; AIZAVA, P. V. S.; PASSOS, P. C. B.; FIORESE, L. Coach-athlete relationship and associated background factors: an analysis in brazilian coaches. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e561974448, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4448. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4448. Acesso em: 4 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences