Exploring the use of portable mode A ultrasound for body composition assessment: A narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44888Keywords:
Nutritional assessment; Adipose tissue; Muscular tissue; Body composition; Ultrasound.Abstract
The evaluation of body composition plays a crucial role in nutrition and is divided into direct, indirect, and doubly indirect techniques. The use of ultrasound (US) mode A, particularly with the BodyMetrix BX-2000 equipment, has become notable for its accessibility. However, there are still few studies that adequately describe its use. Therefore, this study aims to review the available literature on the validation of portable US mode A in different contexts and populations. When compared to other methods, the review reveals variations in accuracy, especially between men and women. Although the equipment appears to be valid for estimating body fat percentage, its accuracy varies in relation to reference methods, and the need for standardization is emphasized due to different measurement techniques and locations. In summary, the importance of further research for standardization in measurement procedures, including specific equations to estimate body composition with the obtained data, is emphasized.
References
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and PeerReview, 4(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
Baranauskas, M. N., Johnson, K. E., Juvancic-Heltzel, J. A., Kappler, R. M., Richardson, L., Jamieson, S., & Otterstetter, R. (2015). Seven-site versus three-site method of body composition using BodyMetrix ultrasound compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 37(3), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12307
Bielemann, R. M., Gonzalez, M. C., Barbosa-Silva, T. G., Orlandi, S. P., Xavier, M. O., Bergmann, R. B., & Formoso Assunção, M. C. (2016). Estimation of body fat in adults using a portable A-mode ultrasound. Nutrition, 32(4), 441–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2015.10.009
Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O Método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Revista Eetronica Gesão e Sociedade, 5, 121–136.
Canuto, L. T., & Oliveira, A. A. S. de. (2020). Métodos de revisão bibliográfica nos estudos científicos. Psicologia Em Revista, 26(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9563.2020v26n1p82-100
Carolina, A., Café, C., Christina, M., Romano, C., & Lamounier, J. A. (2022). Ultrassonografia como método para avaliação da composição corporal : uma revisão sistemática Ultrasound as a method for evaluation of body composition : a systematic review Ultrasonido como método de evaluación de la composición corporal : una revisión si. 2022, 1–17.
Elsey, A. M., Lowe, A. K., Cornell, A. N., Whitehead, P. N., & Conners, R. T. (2021). Comparison of the three-site and seven-site measurements in female collegiate athletes using bodymetrixTM. International Journal of Exercise Science, 14(4), 230–238.
Hendrickson, N., Davison, J., Schiller, L., & Willey, M. (2019). Reliability and Validity of A-Mode Ultrasound to Quantify Body Composition. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 33(9), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001498
Johnson, K. E., Miller, B., Gibson, A. L., McLain, T. A., Juvancic-Heltzel, J. A., Kappler, R. M., & Otterstetter, R. (2017). A comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and A-mode ultrasound to assess body composition in college-age adults. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 37(6), 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12351
Johnson, K. E., Miller, B., Mclain, T. A., Gibson, A. L., & Otterstetter, R. (2016). Bioelectrical Impedance and Ultrasound to Assess Body Composition in College-Aged Adults. Journal of Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism, February. https://doi.org/10.14800/janhm.1176
Kang, S., Park, J. H., Seo, M. W., Jung, H. C., Kim, Y. I., & Lee, J. M. (2020). Validity of the portable ultrasound bodymetrixTM Bx-2000 for measuring body fat percentage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218786
Krueger, E., Ulbricht, L., Ripka, W., & Borba Neves, E. (2015). Avaliação Da Tecnologia Do Ultrassom Portátil E Sua Correlação Com O Percentual De Gordura Obtido Pelas Dobras Cutâneas Em Adultos Jovens Evaluation of Portable Ultrasound Technology and the Correlation With the Fat Percentage Through Skinfolds in Young A. 46, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.13037/rbcs.vol13n46.3153
Lewandowski, Z., Dychała, E., Pisula-Lewandowska, A., & Danel, D. P. (2022). Comparison of Skinfold Thickness Measured by Caliper and Ultrasound Scanner in Normative Weight Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316230
McGirr, B. T., Martin, J. L., Colborn, C. E., Shefflette, A. C. S., Soltysiak, S. R., Dichiara, E. J., & Caruso, J. F. (2021). Intra-rater reliability of lower leg subcutaneous skin fold thickness derived from hand-held a-mode ultrasound. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 30(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-210157
Miclos-Balica, M., Muntean, P., Schick, F., Haragus, H. G., Glisici, B., Pupazan, V., Neagu, A., & Neagu, M. (2021). Reliability of body composition assessment using A-mode ultrasound in a heterogeneous sample. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75(3), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-00743-y
Neves, E. B., Ripka, W. L., Ulbricht, L., & Stadnik, A. M. W. (2013). Comparação do percentual de gordura obtido por bioimpedância, ultrassom e dobras cutâneas em adultos. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, 19(5), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922013000500004
Prado, C. M., Ford, K. L., Gonzalez, M. C., Murnane, L. C., Gillis, C., Wischmeyer, P. E., Morrison, C. A., & Lobo, D. N. (2023). Nascent to novel methods to evaluate malnutrition and frailty in the surgical patient. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 47(S1), S54–S68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2420
Ribeiro, V. A., Jordao, A. A., & Mialich, M. S. (2022). Ultrassom como ferramenta de avaliação da composição corporal. 512–529.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2), v–vi. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
Silva, P. M. F., De Souza, Y. L. L., Dos Santos, A. V., & Xemenes, R. C. C. (2023). Métodos De Avaliação Da Gordura Corporal E Análise Da Ferramenta De Ultrassonografia Em Pacientes Obesos. Arquivos de Ciências Da Saúde Da UNIPAR, 27(8), 4742–4753. https://doi.org/10.25110/arqsaude.v27i8.2023-036
Smith-Ryan, A. E., Fultz, S. N., Melvin, M. N., Wingfield, H. L., & Woessner, M. N. (2014). Reproducibility and validity of A-mode ultrasound for body composition measurement and classification in overweight and obese men and women. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091750
Utter, A. C., & Hager, M. E. (2008). Evaluation of ultrasound in assessing body composition of high school wrestlers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(5), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318163f29e
Wagner, D. R. (2013). Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat. Journal of Obesity, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/280713
Wagner, D. R., Cain, D. L., & Clark, N. W. (2016). Validity and Reliability of A-Mode Ultrasound for Body Composition Assessment of NCAA Division I Athletes. c, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153146
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriela Benatti de Oliveira; Lara Vilar Fernandes; Ana Carolina Junqueira Vasques; Ligiana Pires Corona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
