Animal welfare in free-range systems: Integrating environmental, behavioral, and physiological aspects in Lohmann Brown egg-laying hens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i3.48502Keywords:
Behavior; Corticosterone; Health; Physiology; Thermal comfort.Abstract
The free-range system has been used as an alternative to promote the welfare of laying hens. This study aimed to evaluate the environmental and behavioral factors of laying hens raised in this system. Conducted in a commercial barn, the study involved hens aged 18-24 weeks from the Lohmann-Brown lineage. The microclimate, aviary bedding, and nests were assessed, along with pododermatitis and feather condition. Measurements of temperature, respiratory frequency, and corticosterone hormone analysis were also conducted. The climatic conditions were favorable, remaining within the thermoneutral zone, with no incidence of pododermatitis or feather lesions. Natural, social, feeding, reproductive, stress-related, locomotor, exploratory, and resting behaviors were observed, with morning highlighting internal area and afternoon external area. Maintenance behaviors prevailed in the afternoon, with greater social behavioral expression in the intermediate period. The interaction between observation period and age of the hens had a significant effect on body temperature. Behavioral and physiological assessments are effective tools for evaluating animal welfare. It is concluded that the free-range system is satisfactory in terms of comfort and welfare of laying hens.
References
Abd El-Hack, M. E., Alagawany, M., Laudadio, V., Demauro, R., & Tufarelli, V. (2017). Dietary inclusion of raw faba bean instead of soybean meal and enzyme supplementation in laying hens: Effect on performance and egg quality. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 24(2), 276–285.
Alm, M., Tauson, R., Holm, L., Wichman, A., Kalliokoski, O., & Wall, H. (2016). Welfare indicators in laying hens in relation to nest exclusion. Poultry Science, 95(6), 1238–1247.
Amaral, A. G., Yanagi Junior, T., Lima, R. R., Teixeira, V. H., & Schiassi, L. (2011). Effect of the production environment on sexed broilers reared in a commercial house. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 63(3), 649–658.
Barbosa Filho, J. A., Silva, I. J., Silva, M. A., & Silva, C. J. (2007). Behavior evaluation of laying hens using image sequences. Engenharia Agrícola, 27(1), 93–99.
Bari, M. S., Downing, J. A., Dyall, T. R., Lee, C., & Campbell, D. L. (2020). Relationships between rearing enrichments, range use, and an environmental stressor for free-range laying hen welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 480.
Bessei, W. (2006). Welfare of broilers: A review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 62(3), 455–466.
Bonfim, O. C., do Nascimento Amorim, M., Turco, S. H. N., de Oliveira, P. T. L., Gonçalves, I. C. M., Queiroz, L. C. R., & de Figueiredo, L. B. F. (2024). Variabilidade espacial do ambiente térmico e da iluminação em instalação para frangos de corte em região semiárida. Nativa, 12(4), 631–641.
Bracke, M. B., & Hopster, H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1), 77–89.
Broom, D. M. (2011). A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheoretica, 59(2), 121–137.
Broom, D. M., & Molento, C. F. M. (2004). Animal welfare: Concept and related issues—Review. Archives of Veterinary Science, 9(2), 1–11.
Bueno, L. G. de F., Pereira, D. F., Carvalho-Cury, T. M. R. D. E., Duarte, S. G., & Harada, É. D. O. S. S. (2018). Variação espacial do ITGU e CTR em instalação de poedeiras em região de clima tropical. Energia na Agricultura, 33(2), 123–132.
Camargo, O. A., & Valadares, J. M. A. S. (1980). Comportamento do manganês em Oxisol influenciado pela aplicação de carbonato de cálcio e sacarose. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 4(1), 71–75.
Camerini, N. L., de Oliveira, D. L., Silva, R. C., Nascimento, J. W. B., & Furtado, D. A. (2013). Efeito do sistema de criação e do ambiente sobre a qualidade de ovos de poedeiras comerciais. Revista Engenharia na Agricultura (REVENG), 21(4), 334–339.
Campbell, D. L. M., Bari, M. S., & Rault, J. L. (2020). Free-range egg production: Its implications for hen welfare. Animal Production Science, 61(10), 848–855.
Castilho, V. A. R., Garcia, R. G., Lima, N. D. S., Nunes, K. C., Caldara, F. R., Nääs, I. A., & Jacob, F. G. (2015). Welfare of laying hens in different densities of housing. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas, 9(2), 122–131.
Choudary, M. R., Adams, A. W., & Craig, J. V. (1972). Effects of strain, age at flock assembly, and cage arrangement on behavior and productivity in White Leghorn type chickens. Poultry Science, 51(6), 1943–1950.
Cobb-Vantress. (2008). Manual de manejo de frangos de corte. https://wp.ufpel.edu.br/avicultura/files/2012/04/Cobb-Manual-FrangoCorte-BR.pdf
Dahlke, F., Gonzales, E., Gadelha, A. C., Maiorka, A., Borges, S. A., Rosa, P. S., Faria Filho, D. E., & Furlan, R. L. (2005). Feathering, triiodothyronine and thyroxine plasma levels and body temperature of two broiler lines raised under different temperatures. Ciência Rural, 35(3), 664–670.
Dawkins, M. S. (1989). Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 24(1), 77–80.
Dawkins, M. S., Edmond, A., Lord, A., Solomon, S., & Bain, M. (2004). Time course of changes in egg-shell quality, faecal corticosteroids and behaviour as welfare measures in laying hens. Animal Welfare, 13(3), 321–327.
Fraisse, F., & Cockrem, J. F. (2006). Corticosterone and fear behaviour in white and brown caged laying hens. British Poultry Science, 47(2), 110–119.
Furtado, D. A., Rocha, H. P., Nascimento, J. W., & Silva, J. H. (2010). Índices de conforto térmico e concentração de gases em galpões de frangos de corte no semiárido brasileiro. Engenharia Agrícola, 30(6), 993–1002.
Garcia, E. R. M., Nunes, K. C., da Cruz, F. K., Ferraz, A. L. J., Batista, N. R., & Barbosa Filho, J. A. (2015). Comportamento de poedeiras criadas em diferentes densidades populacionais de alojamento. Arquivos de Ciências Veterinárias e Zoologia da UNIPAR, 18(2), 87–93.
Garcia, J. S., Anderson, K. E., Guard, J. Y., Gast, R. K., & Jones, D. R. (2023). Impact of paddock area stocking density of free-range laying hens on egg and environmental microbiology. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 32(2), 100338.
Gates, R. S., Zhang, H., Colliver, D. G., & Overhults, D. G. (1995). Regional variation in temperature humidity index for poultry housing. Transactions of the ASAE, 38(1), 197–205.
Gibson, S. W., Hughes, B. O., Harvey, S., & Dun, P. (1986). Plasma concentrations of corticosterone and thyroid hormones in laying fowls from different housing systems. British Poultry Science, 27(4), 621–628.
Haas, E. N., Nielsen, B. L., Buitenhuis, A. B., & Rodenburg, T. B. (2010). Selection on feather pecking affects response to novelty and foraging behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124(3–4), 90–96.
He, S., Lin, J., Jin, Q., Ma, X., Liu, Z., Chen, H., Ma, J., Zhang, H., Descovich, K., Phillips, C. J. C., Hartcher, K., & Wu, Z. (2022). The relationship between animal welfare and farm profitability in cage and free-range housing systems for laying hens in China. Animals, 12(16), 2090.
Hernandes, R., Cazetta, J. O., & Moraes, V. M. B. (2002). Nitrogenous and glicydic fractions and ammonia released by broiler litter in different stocking densities and periods of breeding. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 31(4), 1795–1802.
Hester, P. Y. (2005). Impact of science and management on the welfare of egg laying strains of hens. Poultry Science, 84(5), 687–696.
Holmes, W. N. (1978). Control of adrenocortical function in birds. Pavo, 16, 105–121.
Humane Farm Animal Care (HFAC). (n.d.). Padrões do HFAC para a produção de frangos de corte. https://certifiedhumane.org/wp-content/uploads/HFAC-FrangosCorte14v6-2.pdf
Janczak, A. M., & Riber, A. B. (2015). Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science, 94(7), 1454–1469.
Jeon, H., Shin, H., Lee, J., Kim, J., Biswas, S., Lee, J., & Yun, J. (2025). Welfare characteristics of laying hens in aviary and cage systems. Poultry Science, 104(5), 104987.
Kassim, H., & Sykes, A. H. (1982). The respiratory responses of the fowl to hot climates. Journal of Experimental Biology, 97(1), 301–309.
Koelkebeck, K. W., Amoss Jr, M. S., & Cain, J. R. (1987). Production, physiological, and behavioral responses of laying hens in different management environments. Poultry Science, 66(3), 397–407.
Kolb, E. (1984). Fisiologia Veterinária (4ª ed.). Guanabara-Koogan.
Krueger, W. F. (1994). Importance of feathering in broilers and broiler breeders. Ross Tech, 1, 1191–1194.
Manning, L., Chadd, S. A., & Baines, R. N. (2007). Key health and welfare indicators for broiler production. World's Poultry Science Journal, 63(1), 46–62.
Martínez-Pérez, M., Sarmiento-Franco, L., Santos-Ricalde, R. H., & Sandoval-Castro, C. A. (2017). Poultry meat production in free-range systems: Perspectives for tropical areas. World's Poultry Science Journal, 73(2), 309–320.
Menegali, I., Tinôco, I. F., Zolnier, S., Carvalho, C. D., & Guimarães, M. C. D. C. (2012). Influence of different systems of minimum ventilation on air quality in broiler houses. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(5), 1024–1033.
Mollenhorst, H., Rodenburg, T. B., Bokkers, E. A. M., Koene, P., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2005). On-farm assessment of laying hen welfare: A comparison of one environment-based and two animal-based methods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90(3–4), 277–291.
Nääs, I. D. A., Romanini, C. E. B., Neves, D. P., Nascimento, G. R. D., & Vercellino, R. D. A. (2010). Broiler surface temperature distribution of 42 day old chickens. Scientia Agricola, 67(5), 497–502.
Nääs, I. D. A., Miragliotta, M. Y., Baracho, M. D. S., & Moura, D. J. D. (2007). Aerial environment in broiler housing: Dust and gases. Engenharia Agrícola, 27(2), 326–335.
Nicol, C. J., Caplen, G., Edgar, J., & Browne, W. J. (2009). Associations between welfare indicators and environmental choice in laying hens. Animal Behaviour, 78(2), 413–424.
Olanrewaju, H. A., Purswell, J. L., Collier, S. D., & Branton, S. L. (2010). Effect of ambient temperature and light intensity on physiological reactions of heavy broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 89(12), 2668–2677.
Pereira, D. F., Nääs, I. A., Romanini, C. E. B., Salgado, D. D., & Pereira, G. O. T. (2007). Broiler breeder behavior and egg production as function of environmental temperature. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 9(1), 9–16.
Pickel, T., Scholz, B., & Schrader, L. (2011). Roosting behaviour in laying hens on perches of different temperatures: Trade-offs between thermoregulation, energy budget, vigilance and resting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 134(3–4), 164–169.
Rodriguez-Aurrekoetxea, A., & Estevez, I. (2016). Use of space and its impact on the welfare of laying hens in a commercial free-range system. Poultry Science, 95(11), 2503–2513.
Samara, M. H., Robbins, K. R., & Smith, M. O. (1996). Interaction of feeding time and temperature and their relationship to performance of the broiler breeder hen. Poultry Science, 75(1), 34–41.
Sánchez-Casanova, R., Sarmiento-Franco, L., Phillips, C. J. C., & Zulkifli, I. (2020). Do free-range systems have potential to improve broiler welfare in the tropics? World's Poultry Science Journal, 76(1), 34–48.
Schwean-Lardner, K., Fancher, B. I., & Classen, H. L. (2010). Effect of daylength on physiological and behavioral rhythms in broilers. Poultry Science, 89(3), 521–529.
Shepherd, E. M., & Fairchild, B. D. (2010). Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science, 89(10), 2043–2051.
Shevel'ko, E. A. (1967). Thermoregulation in chickens under the effects of controlled temperature doses. Biulleten' Eksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny, 64(9), 29–32.
Sibanda, T. Z., Kolakshyapati, M., Welch, M., Schneider, D., Boshoff, J., & Ruhnke, I. (2020). Managing free-range laying hens—Part A: Frequent and non-frequent range users differ in laying performance but not egg quality. Animals, 10(6), 991.
Silva, I. J. O., Barbosa Filho, J. A., Silva, M. A. N., & Piedade, S. M. S. (2006). Influence of breeding systems on behavior of two lineages of laying hens exposed to two environmental conditions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 35(4), 1439–1446.
Špinka, M. (2012). Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138(3–4), 170–181.
Thom, E. C. (1959). The discomfort index. Weatherwise, 12(2), 57–60.
Tinôco, I. D. F. (2001). Industrial aviculture: New concepts of materials, conceptions and constructive techniques available for Brazilian poultry houses. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 3(1), 1–26.
Vitorasso, G., & Pereira, D. F. (2009). Comparative analysis of the environment of poultry sheds with different systems of acclimatization. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 13(6), 788–794.
Welfare Quality®. (2009). Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Poultry (Broilers, Laying Hens). https://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net/media/1019/poultry_protocol.pdf
Welker, J. S., Rosa, A. P., Moura, D. J. D., Machado, L. P., Catelan, F., & Uttpatel, R. (2008). Broiler body surface temperature in function of different thermal control systems in broiler housing. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(8), 1463–1467.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gislaine Goretti Romano; Luiz Carlos Demattê Filho; Magno do Nascimento Amorim; Érik dos Santos Harada; Gisele Dela Ricci; Miguel Ângelo Cyrillo Narbot; Késia Oliveira da Silva-Miranda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
