Avaluation nutritional of forage peanut (Arachis pintoi) genotypes by multivariate techniques

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.6039

Keywords:

Multivariate analysis; In Vitro; Bicompartmental logistics; Non-linear models.

Abstract

In order to evaluate if the period (rainy season) interferes in the nutritional value and select the best model that describes the accumulated gas values in ten genotypes of fodder peanuts (Arachis pintoi): 13251, 15121, 15598, 30333, 31135, 31496, 31534, 31828, cv. Itabela and cv. RIO in two seasons (dry season and rainy season). The experimental design used was that of random blocks, with ten treatments (genotypes) and three repetitions. It was evaluated: the production of dry matter kg ha-1; the contents of crude protein, fiber in neutral detergent, fiber in acid detergent, insoluble protein in acid detergent and accumulated production of gases adjusted to the models: Gompertz, Logístico, Brody, Von Bertalanffy and Logístico Bicompartimental. The fitting quality of the models was measured by means of the mean square of the residue (QMR), Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and adjusted determination coefficient . The multivariate analysis used was the analysis of groupings with cofenetic correlation coefficient and the Rand index to check the quality of the fit and the quantity of groups. In the period of greater rainfall the genotypes 15121, 15598, 30333 and 31496 were considered those of better productivity and nutritional value. In the period of lower rainfall, genotypes 31828 and Itabela stood out as the best genotypes. The best adjusted model for both genotypes was the Logistic Bicomportamental model, for presenting lower AIC and BIC.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identication. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (16), 716-723.

Albuquerque, L. G. (2003). Modelos de dimensão infinita aplicados a características de crescimento de bovinos da raça Nelore.

Alves, B. M., Cargnelutti Filho, A., Burin, C., Toebe, M., & da Silva, L. P. D. (2015). Divergência genética de milho transgênico em relação à produtividade de grãos e à qualidade nutricional. Ciência Rural, 45(5), 884-891.

Bates, D. M., & Watts, D. G. (1988). Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. series in probability e mathematical statistics. New York, NY: Wiley.

Bourscheidt, M. L. B., Pedreira, B. C., Pereira, D. H., Zanette, M. C., & Devens, J. (2019). Estratégias de fornecimento de nitrogênio em pastagens: fertilizante mineral, inoculante bacteriano e consórcio com amendoim forrageiro. Scientific Eletronic Archives, 12 (3), 137-147.

Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Apllied regression analysis. New York, NY: J. Wiley.

Santos C, Í., Azevêdo, J. A. G., dos Santos Pina, D., Pereira, L. G. R., Fernandes, H. J., de Almeida, F. M., Souza, L. L, de Lima, F. H., & Cirne, L. G. A. (2019).

Ferreira, A. L., Maurício, R. M., Pereira, L. G. R., Azevêdo, J. A. G., Oliveira, L. S., & Pereira, J. M. (2012) a. Nutritional divergence in genotypes of forage peanut. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41(4), 856-863. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000400005.

Ferreira, A. L., Maurício, R. M., Fernandes, F. D., Carvalho, M. A., Ramos, A. K. B., & Junior, R. G. (2012) b. Ranking contrasting genotypes of forage peanut based on nutritive value and fermentation kinetics. Animal feed science and technology, 175(1-2), 16-23.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.03.024

Gregory, W. C., Krapovickas, A., & Gregory, M. P. (1980). Structure, variation, evolution and classification in Arachis. England: Royal Botanical Garden. 468 - 481.

Hubert, L.J., & Arabie P. (1985). Comparing partitions, Journal of Classification, 2(1), 193–218. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908075.

Maurício, R. M., Pereira, L. G., Gonçalves, L. C., Rodriguez, N. M., Borges, A., Borges, I., ... & Jayme, C. G. (2001). Obtenção da equação quadrática entre volume e pressão para a implantação da técnica in vitro semi-automática de produção de gás para avaliação de forrageiras tropicais. Anais da Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Piracicaba, SP, 38, 1340-1341.

Mauricio, R. M., Mould, F. L., Dhanoa, M. S., Owen, E., Channa, K. S., & Theodorou, M. K. (1999). A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 79 (4), 321-330. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00033-4.

Mendes, P. N. (2007). Curvas de crescimento difásicas de fêmeas hereford com erros auto regressivos e heterogeneidade de variâncias. Dissertação de mestrado em Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brasil.

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa

cientifica. Editora UAB/NTE/UFSM, Santa Maria/RS. Disponível em:

http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-PesquisaCientifica.pdf?sequence=1

Purcino, H. M., Viana, M. C. M., freire, F. M., Macedo, G. A., Marriel, I. E., & Mendes, I. C. (2004). Avaliação da cobertura do solo com arachis pintoi como fonte de nitrogênio para produção de milho.

Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical association, 66(336), 846-850.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2), 461-464.

Silva, D. J., & Queiroz, A. C. (2002). Análise de alimentos (métodos químicos e biológicos). Viçosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Silva, K. C. L., da Silva, K. P., de Carvalho, E. V., Rotilli, E. A., Afférri, F. S., & Peluzio, J. M. (2015). Divergência genética de genótipos de milho com e sem adubação nitrogenada em cobertura. Revista Agro@ mbiente On-line, 9(2), 102-110. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v9i2.2142

Terra, A. B. C., Florentino, L. A., & de Rezende, A. V. (2019). Leguminosas forrageiras na recuperação de pastagens no Brasil. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 42(2), 305-313. Doi: https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.16016.

Downloads

Published

19/07/2020

How to Cite

GONDIM FILHO, A. G. C.; MOREIRA, G. R.; GOMES-SILVA, F.; CUNHA FILHO, M.; GOMES, D. A.; FERREIRA, A. L.; COSTA, M. L. L. da; FERREIRA, D. S. de A.; GONÇALVES, N. C.; GOMES, S. P.; PIMENTEL, P. G.; SANTOS, A. L. P. dos; AMARAL, L. S. Avaluation nutritional of forage peanut (Arachis pintoi) genotypes by multivariate techniques. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 8, p. e758986039, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.6039. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6039. Acesso em: 23 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 8

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Antônio Guedes Correa Gondim Filho, Guilherme Rocha Moreira, Frank Gomes-Silva, Moacyr Cunha Filho, Diego Alves Gomes, Alexandre Lima Ferreira, Maria Lindomárcia Leonardo da Costa, Denise Stéphanie de Almeida Ferreira, Nélio Cunha Gonçalves, Silas Primola Gomes, Patrícia Guimarães Pimentel, André Luiz Pinto dos Santos, Lucas Silva Amaral

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.