Statistical techniques approach: two sugarcane genotypes growth under elevated [CO2] atmospheric and drought




Multivariate analysis; Growth; Climate changes; Saccharum spp.


This article aims was to compare two sugarcane genotypes under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and soil water deficit, through an approach based on statistical analysis of plant growth multiple characteristics. For that, Pearson's correlation, dissimilarity and principal components (PC) analysis were performed, of some parameters such as stem length (culm) and roots length, number of leaves, dry mass of plant tissues, among other characteristics. Biometric attributes have a positive and significant correlation with each other. However, the dry mass values ​​have a negative correlation with the other parameters, meaning, therefore, there is a growth reduction as there is also a decrease in plants water conditions subjected to stress. Based on the dissimilarity and PC analysis, observed that genotypes genetically diverge and the imposed environmental condition influences growth responses. This preliminary study is an indication that this approach is essential for understanding the variations between the sugarcane genotypes responses. In addition, is evident (due to divergence) that analyses about the physiological and molecular responses of these genotypes in this environmental condition will contribute to the identification of regulated biological processes and possible tolerance mechanisms.


Barbosa, J. C., & Maldonado Jr, W. (2014). AgroEstat–Sistema para Análises Estatísticas de Ensaios Agronômicos. Version 1.1. 0.711. Jaboticabal, Brasil.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). Crops.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Climate change 2007. Fourth Assessment Report on climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University.

Jorge, A. C., & Rodrigues, A. F. O. (2008). Safira: sistema de análise de fibras e raízes. São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação Agropecuária.

Machado, R. S., Ribeiro, R. V., Marchiori, P. E. R., Machado, D. F. S. P., Machado, E. C., & Landell, M. G. A. (2009). Respostas biométricas e fisiológicas ao déficit hídrico em cana-de-açúcar em diferentes fases fenológicas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 44(12), 1575-1582.

Misra, V., Shrivastava, A. K., Mall, A. K., Solomon, S., Singh, A. K., & Ansari, M. I. (2019). Can sugarcane cope with increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration? Australian Journal of Crop Science, 13(5), 780-784.

Mooney, H. A., Canadell, J., Chapin III, F. S., Ehleringer, J. R., Korner, Ch., McMurtrie, R. E., Parton, W. K., Pitelka, L. F., & Schulze, E. D. (1999). Ecosystem physiology responses global change. In: B. Walker, W. Steffen, J. Canadell, & J. Ingram (Eds.), The terrestrial biosphere and global change (pp. 141-189). Cambridge University Press.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2015). Como será o clima da Terra em 2100?

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica (1st ed.). [eBook]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB / NTE / UFSM.

Queiroz, R. J. B., Santos, D. M. M., Ferraudo, A. S., Carlin, S. D., & Silva, M. A. (2011). Biochemical and physiological responses of sugarcane cultivars to soil water deficiencies. Scientia Agricola, 68(4), 469-476.

Silva, M. A., Silva, J. A. G., Enciso, J., Sharma, V., & Jifon, J. (2008). Yield components as indicators of drought tolerance of sugarcane. Scientia Agricola, 65(6), 620-627.

Silva, P. P., Soares, L., Costa, J. G., Viana, L. S., Andrade, J. C. F., Gonçalves, E. R., Santos, J. M., Barbosa, G. V. S., Nascimento, V. X., Todaro, A. R., Riffel, A., Grossi-de-Sa, M. F., Barbosa, M. H. P., Sant’Ana, A. E. G., & Neto, C. E. R. (2012). Path analysis for selection of drought tolerant sugarcane genotypes through physiological components. Industrial Crops and Products, 37, 11-19.

Souza, A. P., Gaspar, M., Silva, E. A., Ulian, E. C., Waclawovsky, A. J., Nishiyama Jr, M. Y., Santos, R. V., Teixeira, M. M., Souza, G. M., & Buckeridge, M. S. (2008). Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis, biomass and productivity, and modifies gene expression in sugarcane. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31(8), 1116-1127.

Sudré, C. P., Rodrigues, R., Riva, E. M., Karasawa, M., & Amaral Junior, A. T. (2005). Divergência genética entre acessos de pimenta e pimentão utilizando técnicas multivariadas. Horticultura Brasileira, 23(1), 22-27.

Sumner, L. W., Mendes, P., & Dixon, R. A. (2003). Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry, 62(6), 817-836.

Tejera, N. A., Rodés, R., Ortega, E., Campos, R., & Lluch, C. (2007). Comparative analysis of physiological characteristics and yield components in sugarcane cultivars. Field Crops Research, 102(1), 64–72, 2007.

Torquato, S. A., & Ramos, R. C. (2013). Biomassa da cana-de-açúcar e a geração de bioeletricidade em São Paulo: usinas signatárias ao protocolo agroambiental paulista. Informações econômicas, 43(5), 59-68.

United States Department of Agriculture (2019). USDA Agricultural Projections to 2028.

Vu, J. C. V., Allen, L. H., & Gesch, R. W. (2006). Up-regulation of photosynthesis and sucrose metabolism enzymes in young expanding leaves of sugarcane under elevated growth CO2. Plant Science, 171(1), 123-131.




How to Cite

Silva, R. G. da, Silva, J. O. L. ., & Zingaretti, S. M. . (2020). Statistical techniques approach: two sugarcane genotypes growth under elevated [CO2] atmospheric and drought. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e506997645.



Agrarian and Biological Sciences