Physical Education professional practice and teacher education in Brazil: historical analysis of public policies and recommendations for advancing professional practice and teacher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8630Keywords:
Physical Education Teacher Education; Physical Education Professionalization; Public Policy; Field theory; Professional field; Pierre Bourdieu.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the process by which public policy relating to Physical Education Teacher Education in Brazil is developed, highlighting both the most important advances and the issues that still need to be better understood and evolved. To that end, from an interpretative research approach, we analyzed documents related to several laws and guidelines of Brazilian public policy. The results focus on the relation between Physical Education in Brazil and the field of public policies in a historical analysis and its intersection with a sociological perspective. This article concludes that although the field of Physical Education has achieved greater social importance in public policies, there are still several challenges that it must overcome to achieve social legitimacy. Further studies in this approach are therefore necessary to shed light on what is not apparent but is nevertheless part of "how the game is played".
References
Amaral, S. C. F. & Pereira, A. P. C. (2009). Reflexões sobre a produção em políticas públicas de Educação Física, Esporte e Lazer [Reflections on public policy development in Physical Education, Sport and Leisure]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, 31(1), 41-56. Portuguese.
Azevedo, A. C. B. & Malina, A. (2004). Memória do currículo de formação profissional em educação física no Brasil [Memory of the curriculum for teacher training in physical education in Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências e Esportes, 25(2), 129-142. Portuguese.
Ball, S. J. (1994). Educational Reform: A Critical and Post-Structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ball, S. J. & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the “implementation” of National Curriculum policy: An overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 97-115.
Benites, L. C, Souza Neto, S., & Hunger, D. (2008). O processo de constituição histórica das diretrizes curriculares na formação de professores de Educação Física [The process of the historical constitution of curriculum guidelines in teacher training programs in Physical Education]. Educação e Pesquisa, 34(2), 343-360. Portuguese.
Betti, I. C. R. & Betti, M. (1996). Novas perspectivas na formação profissional de educação física [New perspectives on teacher training programs in physical education]. Motriz, 2(1),10-15. Portuguese.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de Sociologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). A representação política: Elementos para uma teoria do campo político [Political representation: Elements for a theory of the political field]. In: Bourdieu, P. O poder simbólico. [Language and Symbolic Power]. Lisboa: Ed. Difel. Portuguese.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Le Champ Economique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 119(1), 48-66.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity; Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992). Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bowe, R., Ball, S. J. & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming Education and Changing School: Case Studies in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
Bracht, V. (1999). Educação Física & ciência: cenas de um casamento (in)feliz [Physical Education and Science: scenes of an (un)happy marriage]. Ijuí: Unijuí. Portuguese.
Brazil (1961). Conselho Nacional de Educação. Lei n.º 4024, de 20 de dezembro de 1961. [National Education Council. Law no. 4024, of December 20, 1961]. Portuguese.
Brazil (1971). Conselho Nacional de Educação. Lei n.º 5692, de 11 de agosto de 1971 [National Education Council. Law no. 5692, of August 11, 1971]. Portuguese.
Brazil (1987). Conselho Nacional de Educação. Resolução n.º 3, de 16 de junho de 1987 [National Education Council. Resolution no. 3, of June 16, 1987], Diário Oficial, Brasília, 172. Portuguese.
Brazil (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil [Constitution of the Federal Republic of Brazil]. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal: Centro Gráfico, 292 p. Portuguese.
Brazil (1996). Conselho Nacional de Educação. Lei nº 9394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996 [National Education Council. Law no. 9394, of December 20, 1996]. Portuguese.
Brazil (1998). Lei nº 9696, de 1 setembro de 1998. Dispõe sobre a regulamentação da Profissão de Educação Física e cria os respectivos Conselho Federal e Conselhos Regionais de Educação Física [Law no. 9696 of September 1th, 1998. Provides for the regulation of the Physical Education profession and establishes the respective Federal Council and Regional Councils of Physical Education]. Portuguese.
Brazil (2001). Congresso Nacional. Lei nº10328 de 12 de dezembro [Law no. 10328 of December 12, 2001]. Portuguese.
Brazil (2003). Congresso Nacional. Lei nº 10793 de 1 de dezembro [Law no. 10793 of December 1th, 2003]. Portuguese.
Brazil (2016). Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Proposta Preliminar. Segunda Versão – Revista [National Common Curriculum Basis. Preliminary Proposal. Second Version – Revised]. Brasília: Secretaria da Educação Básica. Portuguese.
Brazil (2017). Congresso Nacional. Lei nº 13.415 de 16 de fevereiro de 2017 [Law no. 13,415 of February 16, 2017]. Portuguese.
Brzezinski, I. (2010). Tramitação e desdobramentos da LDB/1996: embates entre projetos antagônicos de sociedade e de educação. [Proceedings and ramifications of the LGB/1996: conflicts between opposing projects of society and education]. Trabalho, Educação e Sáude, 8(2),185-206. Portuguese.
Dubois, V. (2015). The Fields of Public Policy. In: Hilgers, M. & Mangez, E. (Eds.) Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and applications. Abingdon: Routledge.
Farah, M. F. S. (2016). Análise de políticas públicas no Brasil: de uma prática não nomeada à institucionalização do “campo de públicas” [Analysis of public policy in Brazil: from an unnamed activity to the institutionalisation of the “public field”]. Revista Administração Pública, 50(6), 959-979. Portuguese.
Hilgers, M. & Mangez, E. (2015). Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications. Abingdon: Routledge.
Iglesias, M. E. D. & Gómez, A. M. M. (2004). Análisis documental y de información: dos componentes de un mismo proceso. ACIMED, 12(2), 1-5.
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical Education Futures. London: Routledge.
Kirk, D. & Haerens, L. (2014). New research programmes in physical education and sport pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 899-911.
Lisahunter, Smith, W. & Emerald, E. (2015). Pierre Bourdieu and Physical Culture. London: Routledge.
Mainardes, J. & Marcondes, M. I. (2009). Entrevista com Stephen J. Ball: um diálogo sobre justiça social, pesquisa e política educacional [Interview with Stephen J. Ball: a dialogue on social justice, research and education policy]. Educação e Sociedade, 30(106), 303-318. Portuguese.
Moreira, S. V. (2005). Análise documental como método e como técnica [Document analysis as a method and technique]. In: Duarte, J. & Barros, A. (Eds.). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação [Research methods and techniques in communication]. Sao Paulo: Atlas, 2005, p. 269-279. Portuguese.
Rufino, L. G. B. & Benites, L. C. & Souza Neto, S. (2020). Formação de professores de Educação Física no Brasil: análise das políticas públicas e implicações para o desenvolvimento da prática profissional. Corpoconsciência, 24(2), 226-240.
Rufino, L. G. B. (2017). Os professores como autores de suas práticas: a pesquisa-ação na construção coletiva de um livro na Educação Física. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 17(2) 443-457.
Rufino, L. G. B. (2018). Entre a escola e a Universidade: análise do processo de fundamentação e sistematização da epistemologia da prática profissional de professores de Educação Física. (Tese de Doutorado). [Between school and university: foundation and systematization process analysis of Physical Education Teachers’ Epistemology of Professional Practice]. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brasil. Portuguese.
Savoi-Zajc, L. & Karsenti, T. (2004). La méthodologie. In: Karsenti, T. & Savoie-Zajc, L. La recherche en éducation: étapes et approches. Sherbroke: Édtions du CRP.
Souza, C. (2006). Políticas Públicas: uma revisão de literatura [Public Policy: a review of the literature]. Sociologias, 8(16) 20-45. Portuguese.
Souza, J., Kantorski, L. P., & Villar Luis, M. A. (2011). Análise documental e observação participante na pesquisa em saúde mental [Document analysis and participant observation in mental health research]. Revista Baiana de Enfermagem, 25(2) 221-228. Portuguese.
Souza Neto, S. (1999). A educação física na universidade: licenciatura e bacharelado: as propostas de formação profissional e suas implicações teórico-práticas (Tese de Doutorado). [Physical education in the university: teaching credential and bachelor’s degree: the proposals for teacher training and their theoretical and practical implications]. Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Portuguese.
Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Luiz Gustavo Bonatto Rufino; Larissa Cerignoni Benites; Samuel de Souza Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
