The efficacy of a dual-axis solar tracking device in tropical climate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9637

Keywords:

Renewable energy; Rain index; Irradiation; Solar energy; Solar tracking system.

Abstract

The demand for energy and the pressure for reducing environmental impacts is increasing in developing countries, mainly in agricultural areas. The generation of electricity from photovoltaic panels can be economically and environmentally advantageous as a source of renewable energy and the ability to reach remote consumers. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of a photovoltaic system equipped with a sun-tracking device, comparing to a fixed panel. The test compared two panels of a photovoltaic cell system, one used a rotation module in two-axis, and the other a fixed one (control), for capturing solar energy throughout the day in a tropical region of Brazil. Solar energy data were obtained in the two photovoltaic panels with data continuously recorded six months, with a weather characteristic of high cloudiness and rainfall indexes. The commissioning of the tested photovoltaic panels was done on bright days. Power results indicated that the two-axis tracker system was useful during the test, presenting an increase of 26% when compared to the fixed panel. It was found that when the cloudiness and the rain index are very high, the sun tracking system might not be as efficient as foreseen. Rainfall and cloudiness index are essential factors for determining the feasibility of using a tracker device in tropical regions.

References

Abdallah, S. (2004). The effect of using sun tracking systems on the voltage–current characteristics and power generation of flat plate photovoltaics. Energy Conversion and Management, 45, 1671–1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.10.006

ANEEL - Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. (2019). Micro e minigeração distribuída: Sistema de compensação de Energia elétrica. (2a ed.), Brasilia, DF. Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, 2016. 32p. Retrieved from http://www2.aneel.gov.br/biblioteca/do wnloads/livros/caderno-tematico-microeminigeracao.pdf.

Batayneh, W., Bataineh, A., Soliman, I., Saleh Abed Hafees, S. A. (2019). Investigation of a single-axis discrete solar tracking system for reduced actuations and maximum energy collection. Automation in Construction, 98: 102-109. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.autcon.2018.11.011

Bentaher, H., Kaich, H., Ayadi, N., Ben Hmouda, M., Maalej, A., & Lemmer, U. (2014). A simple tracking system to monitor solar PV panels. Energy Conversion and Management, 78, 872-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.042.

Branker, K., Pathak, M. J. M., & Pearce, J. M. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4470-4482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104

Carvalho, D. R., Lacerda Filho, A. F., Resende, R. C., Possi, M. A., & Kruckeberg, J. P. (2013) An economical, two axes solar tracking system for implementation in Brazil. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 29, 123-128. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42525.

Kabir, E., Kumar, P., Kumar, S., Adelodun, A. A., & Ki-Hyun Kim, K-H. (2018). Solar energy: Potential and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 894-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094

Kannan, N., & Vakeesan, D. (2016). Solar energy for future world: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022

Kelly, N. A., & Gibson, T. L. (2009). Improved photovoltaic energy output for cloudy conditions with a solar tracking system. Solar Energy, 83, 2092-2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.08.009.

Koussa, M., Cheknane, A., Hadji, S., Haddadi, M., & Noureddine, S. (2001). Measured and modeled improvement in solar energy yield from flat plate photovoltaic systems utilizing different tracking systems and under a range of environmental conditions. Applied Energy, 88, 1756–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.002.

Lazaroiu, G. C., Longo, M., Roscia, M., & Pagano, M. (2015). Comparative analysis of fixed and sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption. Energy Conversion and Management, 92,143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.046.

Lowry, R. Vassar Stats. Retrieved from < http://vassarstats.net/>.

Maghami, M. R., Hashim, H., Gomes, C., Radzi, M. A., Rezadad, M. I., & Hajighorbani, S. (2016). Power loss due to soiling on solar panel: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 59, 1307-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.044.

Mousazadeh, H., Keyhani, A., Javadi, A., Mobli, H., Abrinia, K., & Sharifi, A. (2009). A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.022

Panwar, N., Kaushik, S., & Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1513–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037

Parida, B., Iniyan, S., & Goic, R. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1625-1636. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.rser.2010.11.032

Pereira, E. B., Martins, F. R., Gonçalves, A. R., Costa, R. S., de Lima, F. J. L., Rüther, R., de Abreu, S. L., Tiepolo, G. M., Pereira, S. V., & de Souza, J. G. Brazilian Atlas of Solar Energy. (2a ed.), São José dos Campos: INPE. 2017. Retrieved from <http://ftp.cptec.inpe.br/labren/publ/livros/brazil_solar_atlas_R1.pdf>.

Poulek, V., & Libra, M. (2000). A very simple solar tracker for space and terrestrial applications. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 60, 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(99)00071-9

Rambhowan, Y., & Oree, V. (2014). Improving the dual-axis solar tracking system efficiency via drive power consumption optimization. Applied Solar Energy, 50, 74-80. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X1402011X

Sampaio, P. G. V., & Aguirre González, M. O. (2017). Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4, 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.081

Serhan, M., & El-Chaar, L. Two axis sun tracking system: comparison with a fixed system. In: International conference on renewable energies and power quality, 2010, Granada, Spain, 23–25 March 2010. Proceedings… Granada: University of Granada, 2010. Retrieved from <http://www.icrepq.com/icrepq%2710/227-Serhan.pdf>.

Sharaf Eldin, S. A., Abd-Elhady, M. S., & Kandil, H. A. (2016). Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels in hot and cold regions. Renewable Energy, 85, 228-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.051.

Singh, P., Shrivastava, V., & Kumar, A. (2018). Recent developments in greenhouse solar drying: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3250-3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.020.

Tharamuttam, J. K., & Ng, A. K. (2017). Design and Development of an Automatic Solar Tracker. Energy Procedia, 143, 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.738

Viana, T. S., Rüther, S., Martins, F. R., & Pereira, E. B. (2011). Assessing the potential of concentrating solar photovoltaic generation in Brazil with satellite-derived direct normal irradiation. Solar Energy, 85, 486-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.015

Yao, Y., Hu, Y., Gao, S., Yang, G., & Du, J. (2014). A multipurpose dual-axis solar tracker with two tracking strategies. Renewable Energy, 72, 88-98. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.renene.2014.07.002.

Downloads

Published

06/11/2020

How to Cite

Lins, F. de S. ., Silva, V. A. da ., Nääs, I. de A. ., Lima, N. D. da S. ., & Silva, M. C. da . (2020). The efficacy of a dual-axis solar tracking device in tropical climate. Research, Society and Development, 9(11), e1029119637. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9637

Issue

Section

Engineerings