Cross-cultural adaptation of the Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool made easy (CALCULATE) for Brazil: methodological research in Nursing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10176Keywords:
Validation Studies ; Nursing Methodology Research; Pressure Ulcer; Intensive Care; Scales.Abstract
Objective: to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and practicality test for the use of the Critical Care instrument, Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool Made Easy, in Brazil. Methods: methodological study of cross-cultural adaptation, including five stages: initial translation, synthesis of the initial translation, back-translation, evaluation by a committee of experts and the performance of the feasibility test, applied to the assessment of the risk of pressure injuries in patients in intensive care. Results: The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for analysis by the expert committee and the agreement rate (TC) for practicality in the pre-test. From this, CVI> 0.8 and TC> 80% were considered favorable and the semantic and idiomatic equivalences were considered adequate, with CVI of 0.85 and TC of 84.38%. Final considerations: the scale was adapted for use in Brazil, showed a high level of agreement among specialists during all stages and demonstrated content validity.
References
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, NPUAP (2016). Pressure Ulcer Stages Revised.
Bueno, V. J. M. (2005). Valorización del riesco de aparición de ulceras de presión en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Rev Eletrônica de Medicina Intensiva. 5(11): art.923.
Nóbrega, M. M L., & Gutiérrez M. G R. (2001). Método Utilizado na Adaptação Transcultural da Classificação de Fenômenos de Enfermagem da CIPE – Versão Alfa. Acta Paul Enferm. 14(3):44-51.
Oriá M. O. B., & Ximenes L. B. (2010). Tradução e adaptação cultural da Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale para o português. Acta paul. Enferm. 23(2):230-238.
Richardson A., & Barrow I. (2015). Part 1: Pressure ulcer assessment— the development of Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool made Easy (CALCULATE). Nurs Crit Care. 2015. 20(6): 308-314.
Richardson A., & Straughan C. (2015). Part 2: Pressure ulcer assessment—the development of Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool made Easy (CALCULATE). Nurs Crit Care. 20(6):315-321.
Resolução n. 466 de 12 de dezembro de 2012 (BR). Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da União.
Beaton D. E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., & Ferraz M. B. (2007). Recommendations for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the DASH & Quick DASH Outcome Measure. Ontario (CA): Institute for Work & Health.
Souza M.F., Zanei S.S., & Whitaker I.Y. (2018). Risco de lesão por pressão em UTI: adaptação transcultural e confiabilidade da EVARUCI. Acta Paul Enferm. 31(2):201-8.
Saranholi T.L. (2018). Avaliação da acurácia das escalas CALCULATE e Braden na predição do risco de lesão por pressão em unidade de terapia intensiva. [dissertation]. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), p. 58.
Schardosim J. M., Ruschel L. M., Motta G. C. P., & Cunha M. L. C. (2014). Adaptação transcultural e validação clínica da Neonatal Skin Condition Score para o português do Brasil. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 22(5):834-841.
Silva M. S. M. L., & Garcia T. R. (1998) Fatores de risco para úlcera de pressão em pacientes acamados. Rev. bras. Enferm. 51(4):615-628.
Coyer F., Gardner A., Doubrovsky A., Cole R., Ryan F. M., & Allen C., et al. (2015). Reducing pressure injuries in critically ill patients by using a patient skin integrity care bundle (InSPiRE). Am J Crit Care. 24(3):199-209.
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa cientifica. [e-book]. Santa Maria: UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nathália Caldas Santos; Fernanda Soares Pessanha; Isabelle Andrade Silveira; Fernanda Rabello Sérgio; Beatriz Laureano de Souza; Priscila Alfradique de Souza; Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
