Estudo de comparação institucional para solução de controvérsias para eleições de chefes regionais na Indonésia e no Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10776Keywords:
Regional head elections; Dispute resolution institutions; Comparative studies Indonesia and Brazil.Abstract
This article is a legal research which conducts a comparative study of the dispute resolution institutions between the Indonesian and Brazilian elections. The purpose of writing this article is to map the similarities and differences in the practice of dispute resolution between regional head elections in Indonesia and Brazil to take good aspects that are suitable for implementation in Indonesia. In the discussion, it also covers the practice of organizing elections, election management organs and institutions, including the practice of dispute resolution for Election / Pilkada in both countries. The research method used is normative legal research using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, using a comparative approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Conclusions from the discussion of the research results, the authors propose two institutional options for Pilkada dispute resolution in Indonesia: a) Establishing a special election / election court under the PTUN environment. This Special Judiciary is domiciled in each provincial capital to adjudicate and decide on election result disputes (Election / Pilkada Crime and also examine and adjudicate election / election / election process / administration disputes), or b) Define the authority of the Constitutional Court of Justice to adjudicate disputes over the results of the Pilkada (in addition to PHPU) without any differentiation of regime.
References
Ayuni, Q. (2018) Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Untuk Sengketa Hasil Pemilhan Kepala Daerah, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 48 (1), 199-221. Retrieved from http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1602
Bisariyadi, et.al. (2012) Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional, Jurnal Konstitusi,9(3),531-562. Retrieved from https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/143
Coulson, A., & Campbell, A. (2014). Local Government in Central and Eastern Europe: The Rebirth of Local Democracy, New York: Routledge.
Dian & Ola. (2015) Inisiasi Pengadilan Khusus Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dalam Menghadapi Keserentakan Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, Dan Walikota Di Indonesia, (Initiation of Special Court on the Local Election for Regional Leaders to Face the Simultaneously Election of Governor, Regent, and Mayor in Indonesia), Jurnal RechtsVinding, 4 (1). Retrieved from http://bpsdm.kemenkumham.go.id/elibrary/index.p hp?p=show_detail&id=5324&keywords=
Faiz, P. M. (2018) Efektivitas Ambang Batas Sengketa Hasil Pilkada, Majalah Konstitusi, 138. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/37453597/Efektivitas_Amba ng_Batas_Sengk eta_Hasil_Pilkada_MAJALAH_KONSTITUSI_
IDEA International. (2010). Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook, Stockholm: Bulls Graphics.
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 2: Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mawardi, I. (2014). Dinamika Sengketa Hukum Administrasi Di Pemilukada: Mewujudkan Electoral Justice Dalam Kerangka Negara Hukum Demokratis. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education & JPPR.
Minan, A. (2019). Refleksi Sistem Dan Praktek Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Di Indonesia, dalam Ahsanul Minan (eds) Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019: Perihal Penegakan Hukum Pemilu. Jakarta: Bawaslu RI.
Sardini, N. H. (2015). Penyelenggara Pemilu Di Dunia: Sejarah, Kelembagaan, dan Praktik Pemilu di Negara Penganut Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial, Semipresidensial, dan Parlementer. Jakarta: DKPP.
Susetyo, W, et.al. (2015). Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Tinjauan Terhadap Efisiensi Pelaksanaan Pemilu Di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPHN, Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM RI.
Vickery, C. (2011). Pedoman untuk Memahami, Menangani, dan Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pemilu, Washington: IFES.
Wall, A, et.al. (2016). Desain Penyelenggaraan Pemilu. Buku Pedoman Internasional IDEA (International IDEA Electoral Management Design: The International IDEA Handbook). Internasional IDEA Stromsborg SE-103 34 Stockholm Swedia. Jakarta: Perludem.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Taufik Firmanto; Moh. Fadli; Muchamad Ali Safaat; Istislam Istislam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
