Stakeholders in the context of smart cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11931Keywords:
Stakeholders; Smart cities; Quadrupal helix; Systematic review.Abstract
In 2050, 70% of the world population will live in cities, putting pressure on management to become intelligent and stakeholders gain relevance and interest as an object of study, starting to dispute the protagonism in these territories. We have’t identified studies that recognize these stakeholders in smart cities. The objective was to identify them, as well as their attributes and their salience. We performed a systematic literature review and obtained 82 final documents. As a result, Civil society was the most cited stakeholder, followed by industries / companies, followed by governments and, finally, by academia / universities. The results, both by geographic region of study and by the academic background of the authors, refer to the same result. We did not identify any mention of the salience and attributes of stakeholders in smart cities, indicating a scientific gap to be studied in the future. Teaching and research was the least significant segment among the stakeholders, indicating the need to include this group as active protagonists in this process. We conclude that civil society needs to be effectively involved in these smart cities’ initiatives, after all, these are the main shareholders of these cities.
References
Axelsson, K., & Granath, M. (2018). Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001.
Boucher, Maria B., Rendtorff, & Jacob D., (2016). Stakeholder theory: A model for strategic management. Paris: Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland.
Bracco, S., Delfino, F., Laiolo, P., & Morini, A. (2018). Planning & Open-Air Demonstrating Smart City Sustainable Districts. Sustainability, 10(12), 4636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124636.
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508.
Chaturvedi, K., & Kolbe, T. H. (2019). Towards Establishing Cross-Platform Interoperability for Sensors in Smart Cities. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030562.
Dameri, R. P., & Benevolo, C. (2016). Governing Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611093.
Fernandez-Anez, V., Fernández-Güell, J. M., & Giffinger, R. (2018). Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities, 78, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004.
Freeman, Robert E. (1984). Strategic management. Melbourne: Pitman Publishing Pty. Ltd.
Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Kesselring, S., & Servou, E. (2019). What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation. Sustainability, 11(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010221.
Hollands, Robert G., (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12:3, 303-320. DOI: 10.1080/13604810802479126.
Hosseini, S., Frank, L., Fridgen, G., & Heger, S. (2018). Do Not Forget About Smart Towns. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0536-2.
Jácomo, L. (2018). Advertising-Cities Face to Smart-Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018070102.
Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010.
Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2019). Smart cities and the citizen-driven internet of things: A qualitative inquiry into an emerging smart city. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.001.
Li, C., Liu, X., Dai, Z., & Zhao, Z. (2019). Smart City: A Shareable Framework and Its Applications in China. Sustainability, 11(16), 4346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164346.
Loet Leydesdorff & Mark Deakin (2011) The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18:2, 53-63. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601111.
Lombardi P, Giordano S, Farouh H, Yousef, W. (2012) Modelling the smart city performance. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 25(2):137–149.
Lytras, M., & Visvizi, A. (2018). Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research. Sustainability, 10(6), 1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061998.
Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Cave, J., Millard, J., Pederson, J. K., Thaarup, R. K., Kotterink, B. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. IP/A/ITRE/ST/2013-02, PE 507.480, European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.
Marek, L., Campbell, M., & Bui, L. (2017). Shaking for innovation: The (re)building of a (smart) city in a post disaster environment. Cities, 63, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.013.
Marrone, Mauricio & Hammerle, Mara. (2018). Smart cities: A review and analysis of stakeholders’ Literature. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 60. 10.1007/s12599-018-0535-3.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.
Milošević, M. R., Milošević, D. M., Stević, D. M., & Stanojević, A. D. (2019). Smart City: Modeling Key Indicators in Serbia Using IT2FS. Sustainability, 11(13), 3536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133536.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/259247.
Mosannenzadeh, F., & Vettoriato, D. (2014). Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. TeMa—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6, 683–694.
Myeong, S., Jung, Y., Lee, E. (2018). A Study on determinant factors in smart city development: An analytic hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability, 10 (2606), 1-17. doi:10.3390/su10082606.
Nam, Taewoo & Pardo, Theresa. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 282-291. 10.1145/2037556.2037602.
ONU (2016), New Urban Agenda, Habitat III, available at: http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/.
ONU-Habitat (2015), Smart cities, Habitat III, Paper 21, https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/09/habitat-iii-issue-paper-3_safer-cities-2.0.pdf acesso em 28 de novembro de 2020.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Pereira, F. J., Shitsuka, R. Metodologia do trabalho científico. UAB / NTE / UFSM, 2018.
Praharaj, S., & Han, H. (2019). Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India. City, Culture and Society, 18, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2019.05.005.
Quirino, G., & Storopoli. J. E., Planos Diretores e Smart Cities (no prelo).
Sarma, S., & Sunny, S. A. (2017). Civic entrepreneurial ecosystems: Smart city emergence in Kansas City. Business Horizons, 60(6), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010.
Simonofski, A., Vanderose, B., Clarinval, A., & Snoeck, M. (2018). The Impact of User Participation Methods on E-Government Projects: The Case of La Louvière, Belgium. Media and Communication, 6(4), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1657.
Smart City Index editado pelo IMD World Competitiveness Center’s Smart City Observatory (2019), https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/reports/imd-smart-city-index-2019/ acesso em 28 de novembro de 2020.
Streitz, N. (2019). Beyond ‘smart-only’ cities: redefining the ‘smart-everything’ paradigm. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(2), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0824-1.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management. 14. 207-222. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
UKTI. India's smart city programme: The UK offer to build together. (2015). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 460151/UKTI_-_The_UK_offer_to_build_together__1_.pdf on 16 de dezembro 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jefferson Cirne da Costa; José Storópoli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
