Robotics in oral surgical procedures: Integrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13730

Keywords:

Robotic surgical procedures; Dentistry; Oral surgery.

Abstract

Robots are a technological innovation adapted to use in surgical procedures of the most varied areas, assisting health professionals in fulfilling their role. When associated with dentistry, they have applicability in several areas such as oncology and implantology. The objective of this work was to carry out an integrative review of the current literature on robotic surgical procedures in dentistry, highlighting its techniques, indications, advantages and disadvantages. A research of articles had been done on the electronic databases CAPES, PubMed and MEDLINE, using the descriptors: robotic surgical procedures, dentistry, oral surgery, indexed in the period from 2015 to 2020 that dealt with case reports, literature reviews, in vivo studies that report the use of robots in dental surgical procedures, feasibility studies and clinical trials. After the eligibility criteria, 18 articles published in English were analyzed. Studies have shown that the use of robots in dental surgery brings more precision to the procedure, decreasing tissue loss, reducing the possibility of hemorrhage, reducing possible residual scarring, and post-surgical. Robotic surgery in several areas of dentistry has already demonstrated high reliability, allowing from better precision to greater assertiveness, in addition to providing less invasive surgical access with damage tissue adjacent to the relatively smaller area of operation, optimizing the surgical procedure.

References

Alfouzan A. F. (2018). Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts. Saudi medical journal, 39(10), 971–980. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.10.22887

Borumandi, F., & Cascarini, L. (2018). Robotics in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 100(6_sup), 16–18. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.16

Chao, A. H., Weimer, K., Raczkowsky, J., Zhang, Y., Kunze, M., Cody, D., Selber, J. C., Hanasono, M. M., & Skoracki, R. J. (2016). Pre-programmed robotic osteotomies for fibula free flap mandible reconstruction: A preclinical investigation. Microsurgery, 36(3), 246-doi: 10.1002/micr.30013

Ghai, S., Sharma, Y., Jain, N., Satpathy, M., & Pillai, A. K. (2018). Use of 3-D printing technologies in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 22(3), 249–259. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0704-z

Gulati, M., Anand, V., Salaria, S. K., Jain, N., & Gupta, S. (2015). Computerized implant-dentistry: Advances toward automation. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19:5-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.145781

Khan, K., Dobbs, T., Swan, M. C., Weinstein, G. S., & Goodacre, T. E. (2016). Trans-oral robotic cleft surgery (TORCS) for palate and posterior pharyngeal wall reconstruction: A feasibility study. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS, 69(1), 97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.020

Kim, J. Y., Kim, W. S., Choi, E. C., & Nam, W. (2016). The Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in the Era of Robotic Surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(1):265-268. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.265

Kumar, A., Yadav, N., Singh, S., & Chauhan, N. (2016). Minimally invasive (endoscopic-computer assisted) surgery: Technique and review. Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 6(2), 159–164. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.200348

Ling, D. C., Chapman, B. V., Kim, J., Choby, G. W., Kabolizadeh, P., Clump, D. A., Ferris, R. L., Kim, S., Beriwal, S., Heron, D. E., & Duvvuri, U. (2016). Oncologic outcomes and patient-reported quality of life in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive transoral robotic surgery versus definitive chemoradiation. Oral oncology, 61, 41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.08.004

Liu, H. H., Li, L. J., Shi, B., Xu, C. W., & Luo, E. (2017). Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: a review. International journal of oral science, 9(2), 63–73. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2017.24

Liu, H., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Sun, X., Li, L., Li, C., & Luo, E. (2019). Robotic compared with open operations for cancers of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 57(10), 967–976. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.023

Ma, Q., Kobayashi, E., & Wang, J. (2019). Development and preliminary evaluation of an autonomous surgical system for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(4):e1997. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1997

Mazerolle, P., Philouze, P., Garrel, R., Aubry, K., Morinière, S., El Bedoui, S., Ton Van, J., Ferron, C., Malard, O., Jegoux, F., Berard, E., & Vergez, S. (2018). Oncological and functional outcomes of trans-oral robotic surgery for pyriform sinus carcinoma: A French GETTEC group study. Oral oncology, 86, 165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.014

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J. & Shitsuka, R. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. (1st ed.). https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1

Reddy, E. P., Sinha, S., Chandra, S., & Chandra, S. (2015). CyberKnife radiosurgery: Precision without incision. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015;27:72-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-1363.167088

Shen, Z. S., Li, J. S., Chen, W. L., & Fan, S. (2017). The Latest Advancements in Selective Neck Dissection for Early Stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Current treatment options in oncology, 18(5), 31. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0471-3

Smith, M. M., Young, W. G., Carlin, A. M., & Ghanem, T. A. (2016). Trans-oral robotic surgical excision of an ectopic parathyroid adenoma. J Robot Surg. 2016;10(1):73-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0545-9

Sun, T.-M., Lee, H.-E., & Lan, T.-H. (2020). Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062107

Tay, G., Ferrell, J., & Andersen, P. (2017). Use of a midline mandibular osteotomy to improve surgical access for transoral robotic resection of the base of tongue in a patient with trismus. Head and Neck, 39(9), E92-E95. doi: 10.1002/hed.24851

Downloads

Published

28/03/2021

How to Cite

QUEIROGA, I. S. de M. .; FALCÃO, M. C. de A. V. .; ALVES-SILVA, E. G. .; MELO, E. L. de; GERBI, M. E. M. de M. .; BISPO, M. E. A.; SÁ, R. A. G. de .; MENEZES, M. R. A. de. Robotics in oral surgical procedures: Integrative review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. e1010413730, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13730. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13730. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4

Section

Review Article

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Isis Samara de Melo Queiroga; Maria Clara de Aquino Veras Falcão; Esdras Gabriel Alves-Silva; Eloiza Leonardo de Melo; Marleny Elizabeth Márquez de Martínez Gerbi; Mávio Eduardo Azevedo Bispo; Renata Araújo Gomes de Sá; Maria Regina Almeida de Menezes

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.