Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of videolaparoscopic surgery in relation to laparotomy: an integrative literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20356Keywords:
Videolaparoscopic Surgery; Laparotomy; Benefits; Disadvantages.Abstract
Introduction: Videolaparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical method of the abdomen and its internal organs, performed through a camera connected through the abdominal wall using forceps by the surgeon. The most common surgeries by laparoscopy are: bariatric, gynecological, treatment of abdominal hernias, among others. Objective: To show the advantages and disadvantages of videolaparoscopic surgery and to study the advances in relation to new techniques used in medicine in relation to surgery. Method: This is a descriptive research of the integrative literature review type, which seeks to report the positive and negative points of videolaparoscopic surgery in relation to laparotomy. The search was carried out using PubMed MEDLINE databases, Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, LILACS and Academic Google, during the months of July and August 2021. Thus, a total of 29 productions were made. for an integrative literature review. Results: Considering the surgical procedures involving laparoscopy and laparotomy, it is possible to see greater benefits in the first procedure, such as faster hospital discharge due to the minimally invasive incision that this allows. Conclusion: Videolaparoscopy is a modern and less invasive procedure, used as an alternative to laparotomy, having advantages such as shorter surgical time, reduced complications and morbidity and mortality and a better aesthetic result of healing, but also disadvantages such as damage to organs and vessels, herniation or decrease in residual lung capacity. Therefore, laparotomy is more necessary in patients with cardiac and pulmonary risks.
References
Andrade, C. S., Júnior, Z. B. L. & Teixeira, F. S. (2020). Identificação dos fatores preditivos de aumento de permanência hospitalar no intra e pós-operatório de candidatos a colecistectomia videolaparoscópica. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6 (8), 55850-55860.
Andrade, J. F. C., et al. (2012). Qualidade de vida do paciente submetido á cirurgia videolaparoscópica para tratamento para doença do refluxo gastroesofágico. Arq Bras Cir Dig., 25 (3), 154-160.
Bahten, L. C. V., et al. (2005). Papel da laparoscopia no trauma abdominal penetrante. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 32 (3), 127- 133.
Bezerra, C. A., et al. (2004). Laparoscopic burch surgery: is there any advantage in relation to open approach. Int Braz J Urol., 30 (3), 230-236.
de Sousa, J. H. B., Tustumi, F., Steinamn, M. & Santos, O. F. P. (2020). Colecistectomia laparoscópica realizada por residentes de cirurgia geral. É seguro? Quanto custa? Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 48 (7), 1-11.
Falcão, L. F. R. (2018). Alteração da função pulmonar em cirurgia laparoscópica com pneumoperitônio e elevação da parte abdominal. Rev Bras Anestesiol., 68 (2), 1-5.
Fraga, G. P., Mantovani, M. & Magna, L. A. (2004). Índices de trauma em pacientes submetidos à laparotomia. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 31 (5), 299-306.
Geier, K. O. (2004). Bloqueio Pleural Bilateral: Analgesia e Funções Pulmonares em Pós-Operatório de Laparotomias Medianas. Rev Bras Anestesiol., 54 (4), 506-517.
Gomes, T. C., et al. (2018). Desfechos cirúrgicos e complicações de laparoscopias ginecológicas em hospital brasileiro no período de 2014 a 2016. Rev Med UFC, 58 (9), 33-39.
Inoue, K., et al. (2017). Fatores de risco para dificuldade de colecistectomia laparoscópica em colecistite aguda grau III de acordo com as diretrizes de Tóquio. Cirurgia BMC, 17 (114), 1-8.
Irigonhê, A. T. D., et al. (2019). Análise do perfil clínico epidemiológico dos pacientes submetidos a Colecistectomia Videolaparoscópica em um hospital de ensino de Curitiba. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 47 (20), 1-8.
Mourits, M. J. E., et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomized trial. The Lancet, 11 (8), 763-772.
Pedrini, A., Saltiél, V., Gonçalves, M. A., Leal, B. E., Matte, B. L. & Paulin, E. (2016). Efeitos da laparotomia ou da videolaparoscopia para colecistectomia sobre a mobilidade diafragmática e toracoabdominal. Revista de Medicina da USP, 49 (6), 495-503.
Raffone, A., et al. (2021). Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int G Gynecol Obstet, 2 (8), 1-10.
Salles, V. J. A., et al. (2007). Influência das aderências peritoneais na evolução clínica pós-operatória da colecistectomia videolaparoscópica. Rev Bras Videocir., 5 (3), 117-121.
Santos, F. D. R. P., et al. (2018). Laparotomia exploratória e colecistectomia: análise da frequência respiratória e saturação de oxigênio de pacientes no pós-operatório imediato. Revista Electrónica Trimestral de Enfermaría, (48), 3, 266-275.
Szylit, N. A., et al. (2012). Video laparoscopic intervention for an interstitial pregnancy after failure of clinical treatment. São Paulo Med J., 130 (3), 202-207
Tanner, A. S., et al. (2001). Diagnostic laparoscopy decreases the rate of unnecessary laparotomies and reduces hospital costs in trauma patients. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical, 11 (1), 207-211.
Troncoso, N. T. & Nunes, C. P. (2019). Complicações e fatores de risco da colecistectomia videolaparoscópica. Revista de Medicina de Família e Saúde Mental, 1 (2), 105-115.
Ueda, H. & Hoshi, T. (2017). Functional residual capacity increase during laparoscopic surgery with abdominal wall lift. Rev Bras Anestesiol., 67 (8), 284-287.
Walker, J. L., et al. (2009). Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27 (32), 5331- 5336.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sarah Rabelo Fernandes; Bárbara Queiroz de Figueiredo; Karenn Cristina Neves Bomfim; Kerolyn Keshyley de Sousa; Lorena Martins Servulo de Sousa; Matheus Gontijo Guimarães Gaia; Miguel Alves Ribeiro Júnior; Victoria Herrera de Souza; Edson Antonacci Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
