Scientific production on the follow-up the IUD inserted in the postpartum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27036Keywords:
Intrauterine Devices; Female Contraception; Postpartum follow-up.Abstract
The insertion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods at the time of postpartum promotes improvements in access to reproductive planing. The intrauterine device (IUD) is considered a safe, effective and reversible method. Therefore, the objective was to analyze the scientific production on the follow-up of IUD inserted in the postpartum period. This is an integrative review, accomplished on February 21, 2021, whose eligibility criteria were articles or official documents that addressed guidelines in the follow-up of the IUD inserted in the postpartum period and puerperium. After crossings using the descriptors “intrauterine device”, “PPIUD”, “Follow-up” and “postpartum/puerperium” in the portal of periodicals Capes, Scielo, Medline/Pubmed (Virtual health library). The final sample consisted of four articles. Studies have shown that side effects such as pain, bleeding, and poor positioning can occur at the first to eight weeks after IUD insertion. To assess IUD bad positioning, ultrasound and speculum examination should be performed. Follow-up consultations can be in person or by telephone, carried out by trainer primary care professionals. It is concluded that when users receive information clearly, the chances of continuity of the method are significantly higher.
References
Baratieri, T., Soares, L. G., Kappel, E. P., Natal, S., & Lacerda, J. T. (2019). Recomendações para o cuidado pós-parto às mulheres na atenção primária: revisão sistemática. Revista de APS, 22(3).
Barreto, D. da S., Maia, D. S., Gonçalves, R. D., & Soares, R. de S. (2021). Dispositivo Intrauterino na Atenção Primária a Saúde: uma revisão integrativa. Revista Brasileira De Medicina De Família E Comunidade, 16(43), 2821. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2821
Braaten, K. P., Benson, C. B., Maurer, R., & Goldberg, A. B. (2011). Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 118(5), 1014-1020.
Colwill, A. C., Schreiber, C. A., Sammel, M. D., & Sonalkar, S. (2018). Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement. Contraception, 97(3), 215-218.
Curtis, K. M., Jatlaoui, T. C., Tepper, N. K., Zapata, L. B., Horton, L. G., Jamieson, D. J., & Whiteman, M. K. (2016). US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Recommendations and Reports, 65(4), 1-66. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intrauterine-contraception-management-of-side-effects-and-complications/abstract/52
da Silva, E. C., da Silva Ferreira, R., Mouzinho, L. F., Ferreira, V. H. P., & Figueiredo, E. F. G. (2021). Impactos da utilização de dispositivos contraceptivos reversíveis de longa duração na saúde feminina. Research, Society and Development, 10(15), e466101523281-e466101523281.
Diedrich, J. T., Desai, S., Zhao, Q., Secura, G., Madden, T., & Peipert, J. F. (2015). Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 212(1), 50-e1. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intrauterine-contraception-management-of-side-effects-and-complications/abstract/54
dos Reis, A. C., Galdino, C. V., Balbino, C. M., Silvino, Z. R., dos Santos, L. M., & Joaquim, F. L. (2020). Planejamento Familiar: o conhecimento da mulher atendida no Sistema Único de Saúde sobre a saúde reprodutiva. Research, Society and Development, 9(8), e393985459-e393985459.
Ercole, F. F., Melo, L. D., & Alcoforado, C. L. G. C. (2014). Integrative review versus systematic review. Rev Min Enferm, 18(1), 9-12.
Garbers, S., Haines-Stephan, J., Lipton, Y., Meserve, A., Spieler, L., & Chiasson, M. A. (2013). Continuation of copper-containing intrauterine devices at 6 months. Contraception, 87(1), 101-106.
Gonçalves, W. J., Bortoletto, C. D. C. R., Sartori, M. G. F., Lindsey, P. C., Araújo, F. D., Baracat, E. C., & Lima, G. R. D. (1995). Análise prospectiva pela ultra-sonografia de 400 mulheres com dispositivo intra-uterino. Reprod. clim, 63-6.
Holanda, A. A. R. D., Pessoa, A. D. M., Holanda, J. D. C. P., Melo, M. H. V. D., & Maranhão, T. M. D. O. (2013). Adequação do dispositivo intrauterino pela avaliação ultrassonográfca: inserção pós-parto e pós-abortamento versus inserção durante o ciclo menstrual. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 35, 373-378.
Holanda, A. A. R. D., Barreto, C. F. B., Mota, K. B., Medeiros, R. D. D., Maranhão, T. M. D. O., & Holanda, J. D. C. P. (2013). Controvérsias acerca do dispositivo intrauterino: uma revisão. Femina.
Jones, A. E., Kaul, S., Harding, J., Weldon, D. L., & Akers, A. Y. (2020). Follow-up care and 6-month continuation rates for long-acting reversible contraceptives in adolescents and young adults: a retrospective chart review. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 33(1), 39-44.
Kapp, N., & Curtis, K. M. (2009). Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception, 80(4), 327-336.
Lohr, P. A., Lyus, R., & Prager, S. (2017). Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception, 95(6), 529-537.
Melo, J., Tschann, M., Soon R., et al. (2017) A vontade e a capacidade das mulheres de sentir os fios de seu dispositivo intra-uterino. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 137(09). https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intrauterine-contraception-management-of-side-effects-and-complications/abstract/59.
Pocius, K. D., & Bartz, D. A. (2018). Intrauterine contraception: Management of side effects and complications. UpToDate. Waltham, Massachusetts: UpToDate.
Postpartum intruterine contraceptive device (PPIUD) services: a reference manual for providers. Usaid/Access: Family planning iniciative. Baltjoire (USA): Jhpiego, 2009. 96p.
Pradhan, E., Canning, D., Shah, I. H., Puri, M., Pearson, E., Thapa, K., & Chaudhary, P. (2019). Integrating postpartum contraceptive counseling and IUD insertion services into maternity care in Nepal: results from stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial. Reproductive health, 16(1), 1-15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6542050/
Rapkin, R. B., Aquiles, S. L., Schwarz, E. B., Meyn, L., Cremer, M., Boraas, C. M., & Chen, B. A. (2016). Gel de lidocaína autoadministrado para inserção de dispositivo intrauterino em mulheres nulíparas: um estudo controlado randomizado. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 128 (3), 621-628.
World Health Organization. (2013). Programming strategies for postpartum family planning. http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/93680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Giane Camilo Sarmento; Smalyanna Sgren da Costa Andrade; Aureliana Barboza da Silva Nóbrega; Viviane Cordeiro de Queiroz; Delberlane Arlen dos Santos Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
