Birth rate analysis in the state of Paraná from 2011 to 2021: trends in fertility rates, maternal age, and the influence of education on delivery type
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i6.42028Keywords:
Birth rate; Maternal age; Parturition; Fecundity rate; Educational status.Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to understand the trends and factors influencing birth rates in the state of Paraná. Data from the Ministry of Health from 2011 to 2021 were analyzed, revealing a decline in birth rates over time, in line with the national trend. A significant finding was the significant increase in the average maternal age, highlighting the need to prepare the healthcare system to cater to older pregnant women and consider the impacts on both mothers and children. While the majority of births were delivered by cesarean section, there was no significant increase in cesarean deliveries among mothers with higher levels of education, suggesting that education does not necessarily determine the type of delivery. Additionally, there was an increase in vaginal births among more educated pregnant women, partially contradicting this hypothesis. It is important to note that the analysis was solely based on data from the Ministry of Health, limiting the assessment of mothers' education level in terms of completed educational stages. However, the results provide relevant information about birth rates in Paraná, revealing the decline in fertility rates, the increase in average maternal age, and the predominance of cesarean sections as the most common type of delivery. These findings have significant implications for public policies and healthcare interventions aimed at supporting pregnant women, facilitating appropriate family planning, and promoting best obstetric practices. Understanding these aspects is crucial for gaining a deeper understanding of the demographic landscape and reproductive dynamics in Paraná.
References
Barros, F. C., Santos, I. S., & Matijasevich, A. (2008). O papel da epidemia de cesarianas na redução da mortalidade infantil no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 24(Suppl 4), S637-S645.
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Columbia University Press, p. 209-240. Disponível em: https://www.nber.org/chapters/c2387.pdf. Acesso em: 22/05/2023
Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 279–88.
Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1990). Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth. Chicago-Population Research Center. https:// ideas.repec.org/p/fth/chiprc/90-5a.html.
Bongaarts, J., & Casterline, J. (2013). Fertility transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl 1), 153-168.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2010). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Gestação de alto risco: Manual técnico. (5a ed.), Editora do Ministério da Saúde.
Carolan, M., Davey, M. A., Biro, M. A., & Kealy, M. (2011). Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria, Australia. Birth.,38(1):24-9.
Chan, B. C., & Lao, T. T. (2008). Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008,102(3):237-41.
Delbaere, I., Verstraelen, H., Goetgeluk, S., Martens, G., Derom, C., De Bacquer, D. et al. (2008). Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod.,23(9):2145-50.
Frejka, T., & Sobotka, T. (2008). Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement. Demographic Research, 19(3), 15-46.
Jnifen, A., Fadhlaoui, A., Chaker, A., & Zhioua, F. (2010). Particularités de la grossesse et de l’accouchement chez la femme de 40 ans et plus: à propos de 300 cas. La Tunisie Médicale. 2010,88(11):829-33.
Kim, J. (2016). Female education and its impact on fertility. IZA World of Labor.
Luke, B., & Brown, M. B. (2007). Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2007,22(5): 1264-72.
Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population as it affects the future improvement of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. London: J. Johnson.
Marshall, A. (1985). Princípios de economia: tratado introdutório.
McIntyre, S. H., Newburn-Cook, C. V., O’Brien, B., & Demianczuk, N. N. (2009). Effect of older maternal age on the risk of spontaneous preterm labor: a population-based study. Health Care Women Int.,30(8):670-89.
Michael, R. T. (1973). Education and the Derived Demand for Children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 128–64.
Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. Measurement in economics, p. 67-82.
Myrskylä, M. & Kohler, H. P. (2017). Developmental and educational inequalities in childlessness and fertility in Sweden. Demographic Research, 36, 157- 166.
Rowe, T. (2006). Fertility and a woman’s age. J Reprod Med.,51(3):157-63.
Salem, K. B., Mhamdi, S. E, Amor, I. B., & Sriha, A. (2010). Letaief M, Soltani MS. Caracteristiques epidemiologiques et chronologiques des parturientes aux ages extremes dans la región de Monastir entre 1994-2003. La Tunisie Médicale. 2010,88(8): 563-8.
Santos, B. E. B., et al. (2019). Cesarean section in childbirth as a public health problem: A review. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE, 13(1), 254-263.
Santos, B., et al. (2019). Delivery mode and labor duration in low-risk pregnancies: A cohort study. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 19(3), 645- 652.
Santos, B., et al. (2019). Socio economic determinants of the method of birth delivery in Brazil. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1-11.
Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Brown, L. (2018). A retrospective, cross-sectional, and quantitative analytical study on the effects of educational interventions on academic performance. Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 567-582.
Sobotka, T. (2017). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review, 43(2), 197-215.
Sobotka, T. (2017). Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. In D. L. Hoffnung (Ed.), Handbook of Fertility (pp. 311-341). Springer.
Tomic, V., Grizelj, B., & Zadro, M. (2008). Perinatal outcome in primiparous women aged 35 and older: a case-control study. Med Arh. 2008,62(1):18-9.
Willis, R. J. (1973) A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 14–64.
Yogev, Y., Melamed, N., Bardin, R., Tenenbaum-Gavish, K., Ben-Shitrit, G., & BenHaroush, A. (2010). Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010,203(6):558.e1-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Renan Marques dos Santos; Nathalia Carelli Gouveia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
