Conceptual frameworks used in the evaluation of Telehealth initiatives: A scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15913Keywords:
Telemedicine; Telehealth; Scoping review; Assessment; Framework.Abstract
A Telessaúde tem o potencial de resolver diversos problemas na assistência e gestão da saúde, aumentando a qualidade, acessibilidade, utilização, eficácia e eficiência dos serviços e reduzindo custos. Este artigo apresenta um protocolo de revisão de escopo que visa caracterizar os modelos conceituais e frameworks relacionados à implementação e avaliação de Telessaúde/Telemedicina publicados em repositórios indexados entre os anos 2000 e 2020, evidenciando as teorias subjacentes, conceitos/dimensões chave utilizados e tipos de avaliação envolvidos. O protocolo objetiva documentar os processos envolvidos no planejamento metodológico e execução de uma revisão de escopo abrangente, orientada pelas diretrizes do Joanna Briggs Institute, tendo sido desenvolvido usando o PRISMA-Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Checklist. A estratégia PCC (população, conceito e contexto) sistematizou a busca por estudos publicados nas bases bibliográficas Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase e Web of Science, cobrindo o período de janeiro de 2000 até dezembro de 2020. A seleção dos artigos será realizada em duas etapas (títulos e resumos, seguida da avaliação do texto completo dos artigos), por dois avaliadores independentes, com resolução das divergências realizadas por um terceiro revisor. Os resultados serão analisados de forma qualiquantitativa e organizados por temas. O relatório final da revisão obedecerá ao checklist presente no Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). O protocolo foi registrado no Open Science Framework (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9PWBQ).
References
Ahern, D. K., Kreslake, J. M. & Phalen J. M. (2006). What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research. J Med Internet Res., 8(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4
Arbour, G. (2020). Framework for program evaluation: considerations on research, practice, and institutions. Evaluation, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020920890.
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Aromataris, E & Munn, Z. (Editors). (2020) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
American Telemedicine Association (ATA) (2012). ATA telemedicine/telehealth terminology. http://www.americantelemed.org/files/public/standards/glossaryofterms.pdf
Bashshur, R.; Reardon, T. & Shannon, G. (2000). Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 21, 613-637. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.613
Bashshur, R. L., Krupinski, E. A., Daarn, C. R., Merrell, R. C., Woolliscroft, J. O. & Frenk, J. (2020). Telemedicine across time: Integrated health system for the future – A prelude. Telemedicine and e-Health. 26(2), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0025
Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Krupinski, E & Grigsby, J. (2011). J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health., 17(6), 484-94. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0103.
Bezerra, A. D. C.; Morais, K. de C.; Alencar, M. de; Sales Junior, R. de O.; Machado, A. L. L. B.; Alves, R. de C. L.; ...; Silva Filho, L.S. da. (2021). Creation and use of technologies to combat COVID-19 during the pandemic period. Research, Society and Development, S. l., 10(2): p. e5210212225, 2021. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12225
Brien, S. E., Lorenzetti, D.L., Lewis, S., Kennedy, J. & Ghali, W. A. (2010). Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci., 5, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-2
Caetano, R., Silva, A. B., Guedes, A. C. C. M., Paiva, C. C. N., Ribeiro, G. R. & Santos, D. L. (2020). Desafios e oportunidades para telessaúde em tempos da pandemia pela COVID-19: uma reflexão sobre os espaços e iniciativas no contexto brasileiro. Cad. Saúde Pública, 36(5), e00088920. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00088920.
Cooper, S., Cant, R., Kelly, M., Levett-Jones, T., McKenna, L., Seaton, P., et al. (2021) An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality. Clin Nurs Res., 30(3), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773819846024
Das, A.V.; Rani, P. K.; Vaddavalli, P.K. (2020) Tele-consultations and electronic medical records driven remote patient care: Responding to the COVID-19 lockdown in India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(6), 1007–12. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib,uid&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.34431944e5914659a30c41fef79b5d34&lang=pt-pt&site=eds-live&scope=site
Gogia, S. (2020) Rationale, history, and basics of telehealth. In: Gogia, S. (Ed.). Fundamentals of Telemedicine and Telehealth. London: ELSEVIER, 2020.
Grigsby, J., Rigby, M., Hiemstra, A., House, M., Olsson, S. & Whitten, P. (2002). The diffusion of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health., 8(1), 79–94.
Hong, Q.N.; Pluye, P.; Fàbregues, S.; Bartlett, G.; Boardman, F.; Cargo, M.; et al. (2018) Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.et al. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
Fatehi, F. & Wootton, R. (2012). Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. J Telemed Telecare., 18(8), 460-4. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2012.gth108
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res.,15(9), 1277-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services. (2012). The Role of Telehealth in an Evolving Health Care Environment: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012 Nov 20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207145/
Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T. & Shekelle P.G. (2014). Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med., 160(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1531
Kane, C.K. & Gillis, K. (2018). The Use of Telemedicine by Physicians: Still The Exception Rather Than The Rule. Health Aff (Millwood)., 37(12), 1923-1930. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05077
Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C.M., McInerney, P., Soares, C.B. &,Parker D (2016). An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs., 13(2), 118-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144
Lau, F. & Kuziemsky, C (Editors) (2016). Handbook of eHealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach. Victoria: University of Victoria. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481590/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK481590.pdf
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O'Brien, K.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci., 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Mandirola Brieux, H. F., Bhuiyan Masud, J. H., Kumar Meher, S., Kumar, V., Portilla, F., Indarte, S., et al. (2015). Challenges and Hurdles of eHealth Implementation in Developing Countries. Stud Health Technol Inform., 216, 434-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-434
Markiewicz, A., Patrick, I. (2016). Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2016.
Medeiros, A. M. B., Beltrão, B. C. R., Oliveira Neto, F. J., Souza, A. V. D., Carvalho, T. B. A, Torquato, D. A., ...; Silva, A.C.B. da (2020). The challenges of telemedicine in front of the medical – patient relationship in Covid-19 times. Research, Society and Development, S. l., 9(10): e9219109379, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9379
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol., 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Noorani, H. Z. & Picot, J. Assessment of Videoconferencing in Telehealth in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, 2001. http://www.ccohta.ca.
Pan American Health Organization - PAHO (2016). Framework for the Implementation of a Telemedicine Service. Washington, DC: PAHO. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/28414/9789275119037_eng.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., Mcinerney, P., Godfrey, C. M. & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, 18(10), 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Pluye, P. & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health., 35, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., et al. (2015). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.
Silveira, L., Barbosa, A. D., Ferreira, M. K., & Caregnato, S. E. (2020). Citação de dados científicos: scoping review. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 25:1-31. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e72153
Sood, S., Mbarika, V., Jugoo, S., Dookhy, R., Doarn, C.R., Prakash, N., et al. (2007). What Is Telemedicine? A Collection of 104 Peer-Reviewed Perspectives and Theoretical Underpinnings. Telemed J E Health., 13(5), 573-90. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0073
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med., 169, 467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
World Health Organization. (2019). WHO Guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311941/9789241550505-eng.pdf?ua=1
Yellowlees, P. (2005). Successfully developing a telemedicine system. J. Telemed.Telecearáe, 11(7), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763305774472024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vanessa de Lima e Souza; Ione Ayala Gualandi de Oliveira; Rosângela Caetano; Gizele da Rocha Ribeiro; Daniela Lacerda Santos; Angélica Baptista Silva; Rondineli Mendes da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
