Propuesta de Modelo para la Evaluación de la Madurez DevOps

Autores/as

  • Carlos de Amorim Levita Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • João Augusto Mattar Neto Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17648/rsd-v7i2.202

Palabras clave:

DevOps; Entrega Continua; Pipeline de Implantación; Integración Continua; Infraestructura como código.

Resumen

Este trabajo propone un modelo para evaluar la madurez DevOps en las empresas. Ametodología se basó en una revisión de la literatura, a partir de la cual estructuró una teoría que buscaba relacionar las principales prácticas DevOps. Para cada una de ellas, se definieron algunos constructos de la investigación, que son justamente los objetos a medir por este modelo. Por medio de una estructuración en formato de preguntas con respuestas graduadas, es posible indicar cuánto la unidad de análisis que está siendo evaluada está que se adhieren a un enfoque DevOps en el desarrollo e implementación de aplicaciones.Por lo tanto, la principal contribución de este trabajo consiste en el modelo de evaluación de la madurez DevOps que, por ser fácilmente replicable, puede ser utilizado por diversas organizaciones para mapear eventuales puntos de mejora en la implementación de la perspectiva DevOps en el desarrollo de software.

Citas

AUTOMIC. DevOps Maturity Assessment. Disponível em: <https://automic.com/devops-maturity-assessment>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

AZOFF, Michael. Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting a DevOps Release Management Solution, 2016–17. Ovum Software Solutions, mar. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www-01.ibm.com/marketing/iwm/dre/signup?source=ibm-cloud-weborganic&S_PKG=ov47603&dynform=22003>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

BRAGA, Filipe. Um Panorama sobre o uso de Práticas DevOps nas Indústrias de Software. 2015. 123 f. Dissertação (Mestrado)—Curso de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Computação, Centro de Informática da UFPE, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, 2015. Disponível em: <http://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/15989>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

DUVALL, Paul; MATIAS, Stephen; GLOVER, Andrew. Continuous Integration: improving software quality and reducing risk. New Jersey: Addison-Wesley, 2007.

ERICH, Floris; AMRIT, Chintan; DANEVA, Maya. Report: DevOps Literature Review. University of Twente, out. 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chintan_Amrit/publication/267330992_Report_DevOps_Literature_Review/links/544ba33f0cf2bcc9b1d6bd8a.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

FARROHA, Bassam; FARROHA, Debora. A Framework for Managing Mission Needs, Compliance and Trust in the DevOps Environment. IEEE Military Communications Conference, p. 288–293, out. 2014. Disponível em: <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6956773/references>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

FEITELSON, Dror; FRACHTENBERG, Eitan; BECK, Kent. Development and Deployment at Facebook. IEEE Internet Computing, v. 17, n. 4, p. 8–17, jul. 2013. Disponível em: <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6449236/>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

FRANÇA, Breno de; JERÔNIMO JUNIOR, Hélvio; TRAVASSOS, Guilherme. Characterizing DevOps by Hearing Multiple Voices. Procedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, p. 53–62, set. 2016. Disponível em: <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2973845>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

GOTTESHEIM, Wolfgang. Challenges, Benefits and Best Practices of Performance Focused DevOps. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Large-Scale Testing, p. 3, fev. 2015. Disponível em: <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2693187>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

HAMUNEN, Joonas. Challenges in Adopting a Devops Approach to Software Development and Opertions. 2016. 69 f. Dissertação (Mestrado)—MSc program in Information and Service Management, Aalto University, Helsinki, 2016. Disponível em: <https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/20766>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

HERNANTES, Josune; GALLARDO, Gorka; SERRANO, Nicolás. IT Infrastructure- Monitoring Tools. IEEE Software, v. 32, n. 4, p. 88–93, ago. 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/so/2015/04/mso2015040088.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

HUMBLE, Jez; FARLEY, David. Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test and deployment automation. New Jersey: Addison-Wesley, 2010.

HUMBLE, Jez; MOLESKY, Joanne. Why enterprises must adopt DevOps to enable continuous delivery. Cutter IT Journal, v. 24, n. 8, p. 6–12, ago. 2011. Disponível em: <https://www.cutter.com/sites/default/files/itjournal/fulltext/2011/08/itj1108.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

HÜTTERMANN, Michael. DevOps for developers: integrate development and operations, the agile way. New York: Apress, 2012.

IBM. IBM DevOps Practices Self-assessment. Disponível em: <https://www-01.ibm.com/marketing/iwm/iwm/web/signup.do?source=swg-rtl-sd-calc&S_PKG=ov24988>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

INCYCLE. Online DevOps Assessment. Disponível em: <http://incyclesoftware.com/devops-assessment/>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

JABBARI, Ramtin et al. What is DevOps? A systematic mapping study on definitions and practices. ACM Digital Library, maio 2016. Disponível em: <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2962707>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

LIU, Yuhong; LI, Chengbo; LIU, Wei. Integrated Solution for Timely Delivery of Customer Change Requests: a case study of using DevOps approach. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology, v. 7, n. 2, p. 41–50, abr. 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJUNESST/vol7_no2/4.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

MCCARTHY, Matthew et al. Composable DevOps: automated ontology based DevOps maturity analysis. IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, p. 600–607, jun. 2015. Disponível em: <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7207405/>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

MICROSOFT. DevOps Self Assessment: moving you to the second decade of agile. Disponível em: <https://devopsassessment.azurewebsites.net/>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

PARÉ, Guy et al. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management,v. 52, n. 2, p. 183–199, mar. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720614001116>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

PENNERS, Ralf; DYCK, Andrej. Release engineering vs. DevOps: an approach to define both terms. Full-scale Software Engineering, fev. 2015. Disponível em: <https://www2.swc.rwth-aachen.de/docs/teaching/seminar2015/FsSE2015papers.pdf#page=53>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

SHARMA, Sanjeev; COYNE, Bernie. DevOps for dummies. 2. ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

SKELTON, Matthew. Joined-Up Thinking. Oxford Academic ITNow, v. 58, n. 1, p. 40–41, fev. 2016. Disponível em: <https://academic.oup.com/itnow/article-abstract/58/1/40/2392008/Joined-Up-Thinking>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

SPAFFORD, George; HAIGHT, Cameron. Apply Gartner research for a DevOps perspective when implementing a bimodal strategy. Gartner, out. 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.gartner.com/doc/2893418/apply-gartner-research-devops-perspective>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017

SPINELLIS, Diomidis. Don’t Install Software by Hand. IEEE Software, v. 29, n. 4, p. 86–87, ago. 2012. Disponível em: <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6265084>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

VIRMANI, Manish. Understanding DevOps & bridging the gap from continuous integration to continuous delivery. In:INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, 5., p. 78–82, maio 2015. Disponível em: <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7173368/>. Acesso em: 5nov. 2017.

XEBIALABS. DevOps Maturity Quiz. Disponível em: <https://xebialabs.com/devops-maturity-quiz>. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2017.

Publicado

01/01/2018

Cómo citar

LEVITA, C. de A.; MATTAR NETO, J. A. Propuesta de Modelo para la Evaluación de la Madurez DevOps. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. e672128, 2018. DOI: 10.17648/rsd-v7i2.202. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/202. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2024.

Número

Sección

Artículos