Actividad saprofita de Rhizoctonia en suelos del Nordeste brasileño y relación con propiedades físicas, químicas y microbiológicas

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26477

Palabras clave:

Hongo del suelo; Microbiología del suelo; Actividad de las enzimas en el suelo.

Resumen

El hongo Rhizoctonia puede sobrevivir en el suelo por largos periodos sin plantas hospedantes y condiciones favorables, casi exclusivamente en forma de micelio y esclerocios activos, denominándose a esta estrategia colonización saprofita. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la actividad saprofita de Rhizoctonia en 52 muestras de suelo de la región Nordeste de Brasil y analizar la relación entre las propiedades físicas, químicas y microbiológicas del suelo con esta actividad. En este estudio, la actividad saprofita se evaluó con cebos de segmentos de tallos de caupí y se detectó en el 38,5% de las muestras de suelo. No hubo influencia significativa del tipo de cobertura del suelo al momento de la colecta y la clase textural de los suelos sobre el porcentaje de colonización saprofita. Hubo correlaciones positivas y significativas (P≤0.01) de la actividad saprofita de Rhizoctonia con los niveles de fósforo (r = 0.80), potasio (r = 0.54) y actividad hidrolítica del diacetato de fluoresceína (r = 0.51). Con estos resultados fue posible establecer una relación entre el potencial supresor o conductivo de algunos suelos y el saprofitismo de Rhizoctonia.

Citas

Agarwal, D. K. (2010). Rhizoctonia D.C.: taxonomy, ecology and management. In: Mukerji, K. G. & Manoharachary, C. (Eds.). Taxonomy and ecology of Indian fungi. New Delhi, I. K. International Publishing House. p.19-50.

Ajayi-Oyetunde, O. O., & Bradley, C. A. (2018). Rhizoctonia solani: taxonomy, population biology and management of Rhizoctonia seedling disease of soybean. Plant Pathology, 67(1), 3-17.

Alabouvette, C., Hoeper, H., Lemanceau, P. & C. Steinberg, C. (1996). Soil suppressiveness to disease induced by soilborne plant pathogens. In: Stotzky, G., & Bollag, J. M. (Eds.). Soil biochemistry. vol. 9, Marcel Dekker: New York. p.371-413.

Anderson, T. H., & Domsch, K. H. (1990). Application of eco-phisiological quotiens (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different croping histories. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22(2), 251-255.

Brantner, J. R., & Chanda, A. K. (2021). Effects of inoculum density and cultivar susceptibility on rhizoctonia damping-off and crown and root rot in sugar beet. Plant Disease, 105(4), 1019-1025.

Babiker, E. M., Hulbert, S. H., Schroeder, K. L., & Paulitz, T. C. (2011). Optimum timing of preplant applications of glyphosate to manage Rhizoctonia root rot in barley. Plant Disease, 95(3), 304-310.

Baker, K. F., & Cook, R. J. (1974). Biological control of plant pathogens. San Francisco: Freeman. 433p.

Baker, R., & Martinson, C. A. (1970). Epidemiology of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani. In: Parmeter Jr., J. R. (Ed.). Rhizoctonia solani: biology and pathology. Berkeley: University of California Press. p.172-188.

Bettiol, W., & Ghini, R. (2005). Solos supressivos. In: Michereff, S. J., Andrade, D. E. G. T., & Menezes, M. (Eds.). Ecologia e manejo de patógenos radiculares em solos tropicais. Recife: Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - Imprensa Universitária. p.125-153.

Bonanomi, G., Zotti, M., Idbella, M., Di Silverio, N., Carrino, L., Cesarano, G., Assaeed, A. M., & Abd-ElGawad, A. M.I(2020). Decomposition and organic amendments chemistry explain contrasting effects on plant growth promotion and suppression of Rhizoctonia solani damping off. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0230925.

Bonanomi, G., Zotti, M., Idbella, M., Cesarano, G., Al-Rowaily, S.L., & Abd-ElGawad, A. M.I(2022). Mixtures of organic amendments and biochar promote beneficial soil microbiota and affect Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia minor disease suppression. Plant Pathology, Early View, https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13514.

Botelho, A. S., Rava, C. A., & Leandro, W.M. (2001). Supressividade induzida a Rizoctonia solani pela adição de diferentes resíduos vegetais. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 31(1), 35-42.

Carling, D. E., & Sumner, D. R. (1992). Rhizoctonia. In: Singleton, L. L., Mihail, J. D. & Rush, C. M. (Eds.). Methods for research on soilborne phytopathogenic fungi. St. Paul: APS Press. p.157-165.

Chaer, G., Fernandes, M., Myrold, D., & Bottomley, P. (2009). Comparative resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in adjacent native forest and agricultural soils. Microbial Ecology, 58(2), 414-424.

Copley, T. R., Aliferis, K. A., & Jabaji, S. (2015). Maple bark biochar affects Rhizoctonia solani metabolism and increases damping-off severity. Phytopathology, 105(10), 1334-1346.

Corrêa, G. C., Rocha, M. R., Oliveira Jr, J. P., Carneiro, I. F., & Cardoso, J. E. (2000). Supressividade de diferentes solos a Rhizoctonia solani, nos cerrados do Estado de Goiás. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 30(1), 29-33.

Croteau, G. A., & Zibilske, L. M. (1998). Influence of papermill processing residuals on saprophytic growth and disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Applied Soil Ecology, 10(1), 103-115.

Davey, R. S., McNeill, A. M., Barnett, S. J., & Gupta, V. V. S. R. (2021). Potential for suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot is influenced by nutrient (N and P) and carbon inputs in a highly calcareous coarse-textured topsoil. Soil Research, 59(4), 329-345.

Dhingra, O. D., & Sinclair, J. B. (1995). Basic plant pathology methods. 2. ed. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. 442p.

Donagema, G. K., Campos, D. V. B., Calderano, S. B., Teixeira, W. G., & Viana, J. H. M. (2011). Manual de métodos de análise de solos. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos, 2011. 230p.

Faria, M. R., Costa, L. S. A. S., Chiaramonte, J. B., Bettiol, W., & Mendes, R. (2021). The rhizosphere microbiome: functions, dynamics, and role in plant protection. Tropical Plant Pathology, 46(1), 13-25.

Farr, D. F., & Rossman, A. Y. (2022). Fungal databases - Fungus-host distributions. Beltsville: USDA - Agricultural Research Service. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/fungushost/fungushost.cfm.

Frey, S. D. (2015). The spatial distribution of soil biota. In: Paul, E. A. (Ed.). Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry. 4. ed. New York: Academic Press. p.223-244.

Garland, J. L. (1996). Analytical approaches to the characterization of samples of microbial communities using patterns of potential C source utilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28(2), 213-221.

Garrett, S. D. (1956). Biology of root-infecting fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 292p.

Garrett, S. D. (1970). Pathogenic root-infecting fungi. London: Cambridge University Press. 308p.

Geoinfo (2014). Mapa de solos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos. http://geoinfo.cnps.embrapa.br/documents/1032.

Ghini, R., Mendes, M. D. L., & Bettiol, W. (1998). Utilização do método de hidrólise de diacetato de fluoresceina (FDA) como indicador de atividade microbiana no solo e supressividade a Rhizoctonia solani. Summa Phytopathologica, 24(3-4), 239-242.

Ghini, R., & Morandi, M. A. B. (2006). Biotic and abiotic factors associated with soil suppressiveness to Rhizoctonia solani. Scientia Agricola, 63(2),153-160.

Ghini, R., & Zaroni, M. M. H. (2001). Relação entre coberturas vegetais e supressividade de solos a Rhizoctonia solani. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 26(1), 10-15.

Gill, J. S., Sivasithamparam, K., & Smettem, K. R. J. (2000). Soil types with different texture affects development of Rhizoctonia root rot of wheat seedlings. Plant and Soil, 221(1), 113-120.

Harries, E., Berruezo, L. A., M. Z. Galván, M. Z., Rajal, V. B., & Mercado Cárdenas, G. E. (2020). Soil properties related to suppression of Rhizoctonia solani

on tobacco fields from northwest Argentina. Plant Pathology, 69(1), 77-86.

Hornby, D. (1983). Supressive soils. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 21, 65-85.

Jambhulkar, P. P., Sharma, M., Lakshman, D. & Sharma, P. (2015). Natural mechanisms of soil suppressiveness against diseases caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Pythium, and Phytophthora. In: Meghvansi, M. K. & Varma, A. (Eds.). Organic amendments and soil suppressiveness in plant disease management. Cham: Springer. p.95-123.

Janvier, C., Villeneuve, F., Alabouvette, C., Edel-Hermann, V., Mateille, T., & Steinberg, C. (2007). Soil health through soil disease suppression: which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(1), 1-23.

Kinsbursky, R. S., & Weinhold, A. R. (1988). Influence of soil inoculum density-disease incidence relationship of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 78 (1), 127-130.

Ko, W-S., & Hora, F. K. (1971). A selective media for the quantitative determination of Rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology, 61(7), 707-712.

Leach, L. D. & Garber, R. H. (1970). Control of Rhizoctonia. In: Parmeter Jr., J. R. (Ed.). Rhizoctonia solani: biology and pathology. Berkeley: The University of California Press. p.189-199.

Lobo Júnior, M., Souza, J. N. G., & Santos, A. B. (2004). Processos biológicos e densidade de microrganismos em solo de várzea tropical cultivado com forrageiras para implantação do arroz no sistema plantio direto. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. 6p.

Malavolta, E. (2006). Manual de nutrição mineral de plantas. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres. 638p.

Melo, W. J., Melo, G. M. P., Araújo, A. S. F., & Melo, V. P. (2010). Avaliação da atividade enzimática em amostras de solo. In: Figueiredo, M. V. B., Burity, H. A., Oliveira, J. P., Santos, C. E. R. S., & Stamford, N. P. (Eds.). Biotecnologia aplicada à agricultura: textos de apoio e protocolos experimentais. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica. p.153-187.

Nannipieri, P., Trasar-Cepeda, C. & Dick, R. P. (2018). Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 54(1), 11-19.

Neate, S. M. & Schneider, H. M. (1996). Sampling and quantification of Rhizoctonia solani in soil. In: Sneh, B., Jabaji-Hare, S., Neate, S., & Dijst, G. (Eds.). Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. p.185-195.

Ogoshi, A. (1987). Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 25, 125-143.

Ogoshi, A. (1996). Introduction - the genus Rhizoctonia. In: Sneh, B., Jabaji-Hare, S., Neate, S., & Dijst, G. (Eds.). Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. p.1-9.

Otten, W., Filipe, J. A. N., & Gilligan C. A. (2005). Damping-off epidemics, contact structure, and disease transmission in mixed-species populations. Ecology, 86(7), 1948-1957.

Otten, W., & Gilligan, C. A. (1998). Effect of physical conditions on the spatial and temporal dynamics of the soil borne fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. New Phytologist, 138(4), 629-637.

Otten, W., & Gilligan, C. A. (2006). Soil structure and soil-borne diseases: using epidemiological concepts to scale from fungal spread to plant epidemics. European Journal of Soil Science, 57 (1), p.26-37.

Papavizas, G. C. (1970). Colonization and growth of Rhizoctonia solani in soil. In: Parmeter Jr., J. R. (Ed.). Rhizoctonia solani: biology and pathology. Berkeley: University of California Press. p.108-122.

Papavizas, G. C., Adams, P. B., Lumsden, R. D., Lewis, J. A., Dow, R. L., Ayers, W. A., & Kantzes, J. G. (1975). Ecology and epidemiology of Rhizoctonia solani in field soil. Phytopathology, 65(8), 871-877.

Papavizas, G. C., & Davey, C. B. (1961). Saprophytic behavior of Rhizoctonia in soil. Phytopathology, 51(8), 693-699.

Paulitz, T. C., & Schroeder, K. L. (2005). A new method for the quantification of Rhizoctonia solani and R. oryzae from soil. Plant Disease, 89(7), 767-772.

Phillips, A. J. L. (1989). Relationship of Rhizoctonia solani inoculum density to increase of hypocotyl rot and damping-off in dry beans. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 35(10), 1132-1140.

Sanfuentes, E., Alfenas, A. C., Maffia, L. A., & Maffia, R. G. (2007). Flutuação populacional de Rhizoctonia spp. em jardim clonal de Eucalyptus spp. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 32(2), 114-120.

Schneider, R. W. (1982). Suppressive soils and plant disease. St Paul: APS Press. 88p.

Schroeder, K. L., & Paulitz, T. C. (2008). Effect of inoculum density and soil tillage on the development and severity of Rhizoctonia root rot. Phytopathology, 98(3), 304-314

Schruner, J., & Rosswall, T. (1982). Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 43(6), 1256-1261.

Sneath, P. H. (1986). Endospore-forming gram-positive cods and cocci. In: Sneath, P. H (Ed.). Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore: Williams & Wickins. v. 2, p.1104-1207.

Sneh, B., Burpee, L., & Ogoshi, A. (1991). Identification of Rhizoctonia species. St. Paul: APS Press. 133p.

Sousa, D. Y. X. (2022). Fatores influenciando a agressividade de isolados de grupos de anastomose de Rhizoctonia associados com feijão-caupi. Monografia (Graduação em Agronomia) – Universidade Federal do Cariri, Crato. 46p.

Spurlock, T., Rothrock, C., & Monfort, W. (2015). Evaluation of methods to quantify populations of Rhizoctonia in soil. Plant Disease, 99(6), 836-841.

Tabatabai, M. A. (1994). Soil enzymes. In: Weaver, R. W. (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. p.778-833.

Tótola, M. R., & Chaer, G. M. (2002). Microrganismos e processos microbiológicos como indicadores da qualidade dos solos. Tópicos em Ciência do Solo, v. 2, p.195-276.

Tuite, J. (1969). Plant pathological methods - Fungi and bacteria. Minneapolis: Burgess. 239p.

Van Bruggen, A. H. C., & Arneson, P. A. (1986). Quantitative recovery of Rhizoctonia solani from soil. Plant Pathology, 70(4), 320-323.

Yang, G., & Li, C. (2012). General description of Rhizoctonia species complex. In: Cumagun, C. J. R. (Ed.). Plant pathology. Rijeka: Intech. p.41-52.

Yulianti, T., Sivasithamparam, K., & Turner D. W. (2006). Saprophytic growth of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn AG2-1 (ZG5) in soil amended with fresh green manures affects the severity of damping-off in canola. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(9), 923-930.

Yulianti, T., Sivasithamparam, K., & Turner D. W. (2007). Saprophytic and pathogenic behavior of R. solani AG2-1(ZG-5) in a soil amended with Diplotaxis tenuifolia or Brassica nigra manures and incubated at different temperatures and soil water content. Plant and Soil, 294 (2), 277-289.

Zak, J. C. (1994). Functional diversity o microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26(9), 1101-1108.

Publicado

25/02/2022

Cómo citar

LUZ, C. M. da .; AMORIM, H. C. A. .; BARROS, A. P. O. de .; CORREIA, K. C. .; FERNANDES, M. F. .; MICHEREFF, S. J. . Actividad saprofita de Rhizoctonia en suelos del Nordeste brasileño y relación con propiedades físicas, químicas y microbiológicas. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. e34311326477, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26477. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26477. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Número

Sección

Ciencias Agrarias y Biológicas