Resistencia a la tracción del material de sutura para cirugía oral y periodontal: Una revisión narrativa

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32393

Palabras clave:

Resistencia a la tracción; Suturas; Periodoncia; Cirugía bucal.

Resumen

Objetivo: Proporcionar una revisión narrativa de la literatura actual sobre la resistencia a la tracción de diferentes materiales de sutura empleados en cirugía oral y periodontal. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos PubMed (Medline), Science Direct, Semantic Scholar, Scopus, Scielo, SpringerLink y Google Scholar para la extracción de datos correspondientes. Esta revisión ha analizado estudios sobre materiales de sutura monofilamento, multifilamento, absorbibles y no absorbibles. Conclusiones: Las mejores propiedades de resistencia a la tracción se pueden encontrar en el material de sutura de polipropileno, ácido poliglicólico y polidioxanona debido a sus propiedades. Estos datos deben ser considerados para que el operador elija el material de sutura teniendo en cuenta su comportamiento de resistencia a la tracción para cirugías periodontales u orales donde las suturas necesitan ser retenidas por períodos más largos. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios para comprender la resistencia a la tracción en diferentes procedimientos y la variabilidad de las situaciones clínicas.

Citas

Abellán, D., Nart, J., Pascual, A., Cohen, R. E., & Sanz-Moliner, J. D. (2016). Physical and Mechanical Evaluation of Five Suture Materials on Three Knot Configurations: An in Vitro Study. Polymers, 8(4), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8040147

Abullais, S. S., Alqahtani, N. A., Alkhulban, R. M., Alamer, S. H., Khan, A. A., & Pimple, S. (2020). In-vitro evaluation of commonly used beverages on tensile strength of different suture materials used in dental surgeries. Medicine, 99(48), e19831. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019831

Alamer, N.H., Alkhulban, R.M., Abullais, S.S., Ibrahim, W.S., Bhat, M.Y., & Khan, M.F. (2019). In-vitro Comparison of Tensile Strength of CommonlyUsed Suture Materials for Oral and PeriodontalSurgeries by simulating Oral Environment. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 9.

Alsarhan, M., Alnofaie, H., Ateeq, R., & Almahdy, A. (2018). The Effect of Chlorhexidine and Listerine® Mouthwashes on the Tensile Strength of Selected Absorbable Sutures: An In Vitro Study. BioMed research international, 2018, 8531706. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8531706

Antoniac, I., Antoniac, A., Gheorghita, D., & Gradinaru, S. (2021). In Vitro Study on Biodegradation of Absorbable Suture Materials Used for Surgical Applications. In Materiale Plastice (Vol. 58, Issue 2, pp. 130–139). https://doi.org/10.37358/mp.21.2.5484

Arce, J., Palacios, A., Alvítez-Temoche, D., Mendoza-Azpur, G., Romero-Tapia, P., & Mayta-Tovalino, F. (2019). Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study. In International Journal of Dentistry (Vol. 2019, pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708

Burkhardt, R., & Lang, N. P. (2005). Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques. Journal of clinical periodontology, 32(3), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00660.x

Byrne, M., & Aly, A. (2019). The Surgical Suture. Aesthetic surgery journal, 39(Suppl_2), S67–S72. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz036

Chu CC. (1997) Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices.CRC Press

Dragovic, M., Pejovic, M., Stepic, J., Colic, S., Dozic, B., Dragovic, S., Lazarevic, M., Nikolic, N., Milasin, J., & Milicic, B. (2020). Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features—randomized clinical study. In Clinical Oral Investigations (Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 1527–1541). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4

Faris, A., Khalid, L., Hashim, M., Yaghi, S., Magde, T., Bouresly, W., Hamdoon, Z., Uthman, A. T., Marei, H., & Al-Rawi, N. (2022). Characteristics of Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery: Systematic Review. International Dental Journal, 72(3), 278–287.

He W and Benson R (2017) Polymeric biomaterials. In Applied plastics engineering handbook (pp. 145-164). William Andrew Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-39040-8.00008-0

Hiatt, W. H., Stallard, R. E., Butler, E. D., & Badgett, B. (1968). Repair following mucoperiosteal flap surgery with full gingival retention. Journal of periodontology, 39(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1968.39.1.11

Khiste, S. V., Ranganath, V., & Nichani, A. S. (2013). Evaluation of tensile strength of surgical synthetic absorbable suture materials: an in vitro study. In Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (Vol. 43, Issue 3, p. 130). https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.3.130

Kim, J. C., Lee, Y. K., Lim, B. S., Rhee, S. H., & Yang, H. C. (2007). Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 18(12), 2363–2369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6

Kuzu, T. E. (2022). Comparison Tensile Strength of Different Suture Materials. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 24(4), 355-360.

Manfredini, M., Ferrario, S., Beretta, P., Farronato, D., & Poli, P. P. (2022). Evaluation of Breaking Force of Different Suture Materials Used in Dentistry: An In Vitro Mechanical Comparison. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 15(3), 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031082

Minozzi, F., Bollero, P., Unfer, V., Dolci, A., & Galli, M. (2009). The sutures in dentistry. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 13(3), 217–226.

Saravanakumar, R., Mathew, M. P., Karthikeyan, I., & Sakthi Devi, S. (2018). Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Surgical Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Suture Materials-An In vitro Study. In SBV Journal of Basic, Clinical and Applied Health Science (Vol. 1, Issue A4, pp. 111–116). https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10082-01134

Taysi, A. E., Ercal, P., & Sismanoglu, S. (2021). Comparison between tensile characteristics of various suture materials with two suture techniques: an in vitro study. Clinical oral investigations, 25(11), 6393–6401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03943-3

Varma, S. R., Jaber, M., Fanas, S. A., Desai, V., Al Razouk, A. M., & Nasser, S. (2020). Effect of Hyaluronic Acid in Modifying Tensile Strength of Nonabsorbable Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 10(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_343_19

Vasanthan, A., Satheesh, K., Hoopes, W., Lucaci, P., Williams, K., & Rapley, J. (2009). Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study. Journal of periodontology, 80(4), 618–624. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080490

Von Fraunhofer, J. A., Storey, R. S., Stone, I. K., & Masterson, B. J. (1985). Tensile strength of suture materials. Journal of biomedical materials research, 19(5), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190511

Zuhr O, Hürzeler M.(2013) Cirugía plástica y estética, periodontal e implantológica: un enfoque microquirúrgico. 857 p.

Descargas

Publicado

22/07/2022

Cómo citar

CEDILLO, C. P. C.; QUITO, E. E. B. .; ZHIGUI, J. A. J. . Resistencia a la tracción del material de sutura para cirugía oral y periodontal: Una revisión narrativa. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 10, p. e45111032393, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32393. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32393. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.

Número

Sección

Revisiones