Considerações sobre a filosofia "no-post" em dentes tratados endodonticamente: Revisão de literatura

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i7.37863

Palavras-chave:

Resinas compostas; Dente não vital; Restauração dentária permanente.

Resumo

A restauração de dentes tratados endodonticamente com grandes perdas de estrutura dentária é um verdadeiro desafio para a Odontologia, visto a necessidade de utilização de materiais com capacidade de ampliar o suporte coronário e impedir a propagação de fraturas. Recentemente, uma mudança sobre o uso de retentores intrarradiculares vem surgindo, criando um novo conceito “no post”, a partir da utilização de compósitos resinosos reforçados por fibras de vidro. O objetivo desta revisão consiste em explorar na literatura se o material, representado pela EverX Posterior (GC), apresenta alguma vantagem de uso em comparação com os outros materiais já descritos para a restauração de dentes tratados endodonticamente. A busca foi realizada nas principais bases de dados, PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science, resultando em 163 artigos. Após a exclusão de duplicatas e leitura na íntegra, 14 artigos in vitro e 1 artigo clínico foram incluídos na versão final de análise. Com relação aos dados encontrados, o novo biomaterial apresentou maior resistência à fratura em dentes posteriores na maioria dos estudos avaliados, exceto em comparação com as restaurações indiretas, principalmente do tipo endocrown. Em comparação com as restaurações diretas, a EverX Posterior, em “bicamada”, funcionou como um reforço para distribuição de forças e com propriedades melhoradas na presença de ranhuras retentivas. Já para os retentores intrarradiculares, o novo biomaterial também garantiu uma melhora do comportamento mecânico, semelhante à comparação feita para as fibras de polietileno e de vidro. Desse modo, novos estudos clínicos devem ser feitos para comprovar as considerações sobre essa filosofia.

Referências

Abouelleil, H., Pradelle, N., Villat, C., Attik, N., Colon, P., & Grosgogeat, B. (2015). Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 40(4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262

Alshiddi, I. F., & Aljinbaz, A. (2016). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations - An in vitro study. The Saudi dental journal, 28(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.09.001

Altier, M., Erol, F., Yildirim, G., & Dalkilic, E. E. (2018). Fracture resistance and failure modes of lithium disilicate or composite endocrowns. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 21(7), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_175_17

Atalay, C., Yazici, A. R., Horuztepe, A., Nagas, E., Ertan, A., & Ozgunaltay, G. (2016). Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite. Operative dentistry, 41(5), E131–E140. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-320-L

Ayna, B., Celenk, S., Atakul, F., & Uysal, E. (2009). Three-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with a polyethylene fibre-reinforced composite. Australian dental journal, 54(2), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01106.x

Baraba, A., Cimic, S., Basso, M., Ionescu, A. C., Brambilla, E., & Miletić, I. (2021). Microtensile Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced and Particulate Filler Composite to Coronal and Pulp Chamber Floor Dentin. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(9), 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092400

Behr, M., Rosentritt, M., Latzel, D., & Handel, G. (2003). Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced vs. non-fiber-reinforced composite molar crowns. Clinical oral investigations, 7(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0211-x

Belli, S., Cobankara, F. K., Eraslan, O., Eskitascioglu, G., & Karbhari, V. (2006). The effect of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars with MOD cavity and reattached fractured lingual cusps. Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 79(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30508

Belli, S., Erdemir, A., Ozcopur, M., & Eskitascioglu, G. (2005). The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. International endodontic journal, 38(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00892.x

Belli, S., Erdemir, A., & Yildirim, C. (2006). Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. International endodontic journal, 39(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01057.x

Bijelic-Donova, J., Keulemans, F., Vallittu, P. K., & Lassila, L. (2020). Direct bilayered biomimetic composite restoration: The effect of a cusp-supporting short fiber-reinforced base design on the chewing fracture resistance and failure mode of molars with or without endodontic treatment. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 103, 103554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103554

Carvalho, M. A., Lazari, P. C., Gresnigt, M., Del Bel Cury, A. A., & Magne, P. (2018). Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Brazilian oral research, 32(suppl 1), e74. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0074

Cimpean, S. I., Pop-Ciutrila, I., Buduru, S., Pavel, L. L., Florea, D. F., Delean, A. G., Moldovan, M., Dudescu, M. C., Berbece, S., Voinescu, D. C., Beznea, A., Begucioiu, M. & Stefanescu, V. (2020). Assessing fracture resistance of non vital teeth using two different composite systems: short-fiber-reinforced composite and glass fiber post with microfilled hybrid composite. Materiale Plastice, 57(4), 286-296.

Deliperi, S., Alleman, D., & Rudo, D. (2017). Stress-reduced Direct Composites for the Restoration of Structurally Compromised Teeth: Fiber Design According to the "Wallpapering" Technique. Operative dentistry, 42(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-289-T

Eapen, A. M., Amirtharaj, L. V., Sanjeev, K., & Mahalaxmi, S. (2017). Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with 2 Different Fiber-reinforced Composite and 2 Conventional Composite Resin Core Buildup Materials: An In Vitro Study. Journal of endodontics, 43(9), 1499–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.031

Eskitaşcioğlu, G., Belli, S., & Kalkan, M. (2002). Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). Journal of endodontics, 28(9), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200209000-00001

Ferracane, J. L., & Greener, E. H. (1986). The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. Journal of biomedical materials research, 20(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200111

Figueiredo, F. E., Martins-Filho, P. R., & Faria-E-Silva, A. L. (2015). Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endodontics, 41(3), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006

Frankenberger, R., Winter, J., Dudek, M. C., Naumann, M., Amend, S., Braun, A., Krämer, N., & Roggendorf, M. J. (2021). Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(24), 7733. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247733

Fuss, Z., Lustig, J., & Tamse, A. (1999). Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth. International endodontic journal, 32(4), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00208.x

Gaintantzopoulou, M. D., Farmakis, E. T., & Eliades, G. C. (2018). Effect of Load Cycling on the Fracture Strength/Mode of Teeth Restored with FRC Posts or a FRC Liner and a Resin Composite. BioMed research international, 2018, 9054301. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9054301

Garlapati, T. G., Krithikadatta, J., & Natanasabapathy, V. (2017). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material-An in vitro study. Journal of prosthodontic research, 61(4), 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.02.001

Garoushi, S., Gargoum, A., Vallittu, P. K., & Lassila, L. (2018). Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: A review of the current literature. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 9(3), e12330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12330

Garoushi, S., Vallittu, P. K., & Lassila, L. (2017). Mechanical Properties and Wear of Five Commercial Fibre-Reinforced Filling Materials. The Chinese journal of dental research: the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA), 20(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.a38768

Garoushi, S., Vallittu, P. K., & Lassila, L. V. (2007). Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 23(11), 1356–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.017

Gordan, V. V., Shen, C., Riley, J., 3rd, & Mjör, I. A. (2006). Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 18(3), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00007.x

Kalburge, V., Yakub, S. S., Kalburge, J., Hiremath, H., & Chandurkar, A. (2013). A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research, 24(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.116676

Kassis, C., Khoury, P., Mehanna, C. Z., Baba, N. Z., Bou Chebel, F., Daou, M., & Hardan, L. (2021). Effect of Inlays, Onlays and Endocrown Cavity Design Preparation on Fracture Resistance and Fracture Mode of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 30(7), 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13294

Kaur, B., Gupta, S., Grover, R., Sadana, G., Gupta, T., & Mehra, M. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Different Core Build-up Materials: An In VitroStudy. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 14(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1901

Keulemans, F., Garoush, S. & Lassila, L. (2017). Fillings and core build-ups (Book Chapter). In: Vallittu P, Özcan M, eds. A Clinical Guide to Principles of Fibre Reinforced Composites (FRCs) in Dentistry. Duxford: Woodhead Publishing, 131-163.

Kijsamanmith, K., Timpawat, S., Harnirattisai, C., & Messer, H. H. (2002). Micro-tensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal floor dentine. International endodontic journal, 35(10), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00581.x

Kumar, A., & Sarthak, S. (2018). In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk-fill, bulk-fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional resin composite. J Oper Dent Endod , 3(1):12–17.

Lohbauer, U., Nikolaenko, S. A., Petschelt, A., & Frankenberger, R. (2008). Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 10(2), 97–103.

Mena-Álvares, J., Agustín-Panadero, R. & Zubizarreta-Macho, A. (2020). Effect of Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Elastic Post on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars with Root Canal Treatment—An In Vitro Pilot Study. Appl. Sci, 10, 7616.

Mortazavi, V., Fathi, M., Katiraei, N., Shahnaseri, S., Badrian, H., & Khalighinejad, N. (2012). Fracture resistance of structurally compromised and normal endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems: An in vitro study. Dental research journal, 9(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.95234

Nahata, M. C. (2008). Tips for writing and publishing an article. The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 42(2), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1K616

Nothdurft, F. P., Seidel, E., Gebhart, F., Naumann, M., Motter, P. J., & Pospiech, P. R. (2008). The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems. Journal of dentistry, 36(6), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.004

Ozsevik, A. S., Yildirim, C., Aydin, U., Culha, E., & Surmelioglu, D. (2016). Effect of fibre-reinforced composite on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 42(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12136

Pashley, D. H., Tay, F. R., Breschi, L., Tjäderhane, L., Carvalho, R. M., Carrilho, M., & Tezvergil-Mutluay, A. (2011). State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016

Rocca, G. T., Saratti, C. M., Cattani-Lorente, M., Feilzer, A. J., Scherrer, S., & Krejci, I. (2015). The effect of a fiber reinforced cavity configuration on load bearing capacity and failure mode of endodontically treated molars restored with CAD/CAM resin composite overlay restorations. Journal of dentistry, 43(9), 1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.012

Saker, S., & Özcan, M. (2015). Retentive strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts with composite resin cores: Effect of remaining coronal structure and root canal dentin conditioning protocols. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 114(6), 856–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.015

Scotti, N., Michelotto Tempesta, R., Pasqualini, D., Baldi, A., Vergano, E. A., Baldissara, P., Alovisi, M., & Comba, A. (2020). 3D Interfacial Gap and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Fiber-reinforced Composites. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 22(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44286

Tanner, J., Tolvanen, M., Garoushi, S., & Säilynoja, E. (2018). Clinical Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth - Results of 2.5 Year Follow-up. The open dentistry journal, 12, 476–485. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010476

Tekçe, N., Pala, K., Tuncer, S., Demirci, M., & Serim, M. E. (2017). Influence of polymerisation method and type of fibre on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth. Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 43(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12187

Valizadeh, S., Ranjbar Omrani, L., Deliperi, S., & Sadeghi Mahounak, F. (2020). Restoration of a Nonvital Tooth with Fiber Reinforce Composite (Wallpapering Technique). Case reports in dentistry, 2020, 9619787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9619787

Vallittu P. K. (1998). The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 79(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70204-5

Vallittu, P. K., Lassila, V. P., & Lappalainen, R. (1994). Transverse strength and fatigue of denture acrylic-glass fiber composite. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 10(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90051-5

Yasa, B., Arslan, H., Yasa, E., Akcay, M., & Hatirli, H. (2016). Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Acta odontológica Scandinavica, 74(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.104691

Downloads

Publicado

14/07/2023

Como Citar

JANUZZI, M. S. .; GANDOLFO, M. I. L. .; MAZARO, J. V. Q. .; ZAVANELLI, R. A. .; ZAVANELLI , A. C. Considerações sobre a filosofia "no-post" em dentes tratados endodonticamente: Revisão de literatura . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 7, p. e6012737863, 2023. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i7.37863. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37863. Acesso em: 31 out. 2024.

Edição

v. 12 n. 7

Seção

Ciências da Saúde

Licença

Copyright (c) 2023 Marcella Santos Januzzi; Maria Isabela Lopes Gandolfo; José Vitor Quinelli Mazaro; Ricardo Alexandre Zavanelli; Adriana Cristina Zavanelli

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.