The feedback process in performance appraisal as a tool for organizational development: The Case of JSI–MozNorte

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i5.51023

Keywords:

Performance appraisal, Feedback, Organizational development, Human resource management, Organizational alignment.

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of feedback in the performance appraisal process as a tool for organizational development, focusing on the case of JSI–MozNorte. It is based on the assumption that performance appraisal, when supported by effective feedback practices, can significantly enhance employee development and institutional growth. The main objective of this study was to examine the feedback process within performance appraisal at JSI MozNorte, focusing on the types of feedback used, employees’ perceptions, and its relationship with organizational development. Methodologically, a qualitative and interpretive approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with employees and managers, complemented by document analysis. Data were analyzed through thematic content analysis. The findings reveal that feedback is often informal and irregular, mainly focused on positive reinforcement and corrective actions, with limited emphasis on long-term competency development. The study concludes that although feedback is recognized as essential, its full potential is not yet realized. Strengthening systematic, continuous, and development-oriented feedback practices is necessary to enhance organizational performance and sustainability.

References

Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance management for dummies. Wiley.

Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (12th ed.). Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M. (2021). Strategic human resource management. Kogan Page.

Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Cellard, A. (2014). A análise documental. In J. Poupart et al. (Eds.), A pesquisa qualitativa. Vozes.

Chiavenato, I. (2014). Gestão de pessoas (4ª ed.). Elsevier.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design (4th ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). Sage.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.

Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (2nd ed.). Sage.

Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social (7ª ed.). Atlas.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2017). Metodologia científica (8ª ed.). Atlas.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Minayo, M. C. S. (2017). O desafio do conhecimento (14ª ed.). Hucitec.

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [Free ebook]. Santa Maria. Editora da UFSM.

Risemberg, R. I. C. et al. (2026). A importância da metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de artigos científicos. E-Acadêmica, 7(1), e0171675. https://doi.org/10.52076/eacad-v7i1.675. https://eacademica.org/eacademica/article/view/675.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2018). Qualitative interviewing (4th ed.). Sage.

Severino, A. J. (2016). Metodologia do trabalho científico (24ª ed.). Cortez.

Yin, R. K. (2022). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage.

Published

2026-05-14

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences

How to Cite

The feedback process in performance appraisal as a tool for organizational development: The Case of JSI–MozNorte. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 5, p. e5515551023, 2026. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v15i5.51023. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/51023. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2026.