Evaluation of the effectiveness of Continuous Infusion Pump (CIP) in pain control in the recovery period after thoracic surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35727Keywords:
Thoracotomy, Pain, Anesthesia, epidural, Infusion Pumps.Abstract
Objective: to verify the effectiveness of epidural block in a continuous infusion pump (BIC), without pain control in the postoperative period of thoracic surgery. Methodology: cross-sectional study, using a database carried out at the Center for Oncological Research (CEPON), in patients undergoing thoracic surgery from 2018 to 2020, in patients undergoing a thoracotomy. For data analysis, the IBM Statististicsl Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS®) 18.0 program was used, in the descriptive analysis of the dependent variable Visual Analog Scale of Pain and Length of Stay in the ICU, using the Mann-Whitney U Test . Quantitative data generated by measures of central tendency (average) and their variability/dispersion and qualitative measures in the form of simple and relative frequencies. Study approved by the research ethics committee. Results: in this series, they were due to 35 patients who underwent thoracic surgery, the most prevalent male (57.1%), mean age 56.63 and mean ICU length of 2.78. The most frequent surgery for lobectomy (51.7%). The Mann-Whitney U Test leaves group 1 reporting less pain than group 2 at POi (p = 0.035). an average length of stay in the ICU was observed for patients in group 1 (3.67 ± 1.63). Conclusion: the study, the use of epidural block in BIC with superior efficacy in controlling postoperative pain in the sample undergoing thoracic surgery at CEPON, also observed a longer length of stay in the ICU of patients who used this anesthetic modality.
References
Almeida V., Gama E., Espejo C., & Pedroso J. (2018). A singularidade da dor de pacientes oncológicos em cuidados paliativos. Mudanças - Psicologia da Saúde, 26(1):75.
Appleton S. (2018). Dor Crónica Pós-Cirúrgica: Uma Realidade Crescente. Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Anestesiologia, 27(2).
Attri J., Kaur R., Kaur H., & Makhni R. (2016). Post thoracotomy pain management: A review of current available modalities. Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College,1(1).
Chen L., Wu Y., Cai Y., Ye Y., Li L., & Xia Y. (2019). Comparison of programmed intermittent bolus infusion and continuous infusion for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with thoracic paravertebral block catheter: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 44(2):240-245.
Dângelo, J. G. & Fattini, C.A. (2001). Anatomia Humana Sistêmica e Segmentar. (2a ed.), Atheneu.
Ercolani, D., Hopf, L.B.D.S., & Schwan, L. (2018). Dor crônica oncológica: avaliação e manejo. Acta medica, 39(2).
Gasparini, J., Mello, S., Marques, R., & Saraiva, R. (2008). Analgesia pós-operatória plexular contínua: estudo dos efeitos colaterais e do risco de infecção dos cateteres. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 58(6):602-613.
Goto, T. (2018) What is the best pain control after thoracic surgery? Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(3):1335-1338.
Guyatt, G., Gutterman, D., Baumann, M., Addrizzo-Harris, D., Hylek, E., & Phillips, B. (2006) Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines. Chest, 129(1):174-181.
Heck, J. (2004) Anestesia em cirurgia torácica. Anestesiologia Princípios e Técnicas, 3:775-787.
Hall Burton, D., Boretsky, K. (2014) A comparison of paravertebral nerve block catheters and thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia following the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum repair. Pediatric Anesthesia, 24(5):516-520.
Higashi, M., Shigematsu, K., Nakamori, E., Sakurai, S., & Yamaura, K. (2019) Efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 19(1).
Huang, A., & Sakata, R. (2016). Dor após esternotomia – revisão. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, 66(4):395-401.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2015). Estimativa 2016: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA.
Julius, D., & Basbaum, A. (2001) Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature, 413(6852):203-210.
Kambam, J., Hammon, J., Parris, W., & Lupinetti, F. (1989) Intrapleural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain and blood levels of bupivacaine following intrapleural injection. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 36(2):106-109.
Leandro, J., Rodrigues, O., Slaets, A., Schmidt, Jr. A., & Yaekashi, M. (2014). Comparação entre duas técnicas de fechamento de toracotomia: dor pós-operatória e função pulmonar. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia,40(4).
Litle, V., & Canelli, R. (2020). Perioperative Management of the Thoracic Surgery Patient. Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 30(3)
Liu, F. F., Liu, X. M., Liu, X. Y., Tang, J., Jin, L., Li, W. Y., & Zhang, L. D. (2015). Postoperative continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine has comparable analgesic effects and fewer complications as compared to traditional patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil in patients undergoing non-cardiac thoracotomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8(4):5438-45.
Loop, T., Harris, S., & Grimm, A. (2014) Recent Advances in Postoperative Pain Therapy for Thoracic Surgery. Current Anesthesiology Reports, 4(2):177-187.
Loftus, D. P., Elder, C., Russell, K., Spanos, S., Barnhart, D., & Scaife, E. (2016) Paravertebral regional blocks decrease length of stay following surgery for pe-
ctus excavatum in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 51(1):149-153.
Mesbah, A., Yeung, J., & Gao, F. (2016). Pain after thoracotomy. BJA Education, 16(1):1-7.
Nicastri, D., Wisnivesky, J., Litle, V., Yun, J., Chin, C., & Dembitzer, F. (2008). Thoracoscopic lobectomy: Report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 135(3):642-647.
Oram, R., & Rasburn, N. Analgesia for thoracic surgery. (2017). Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine.;18(12):606-608.
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM.
Ravindra, G. (2016). Intrapleural Analgesis for Post Thoractomy Pain Management. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 3(10):2898-2902.
Resende, F., Mourão, M., Allevato, B., Oliveira, B., Oliveira, C., & Silva, S. (2014) Analgesia for thoracotomy with multi-perforated catheters and elastomeric pump: case report. Revista Médica de Minas Gerais, 24.
Rizzi, A., Raveglia, F., Scarci, M., Cioffi, U., & Baisi, A. (2019). The best strategy to control pain after thoracic surgery: multimodal strategy against pain. Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery, 4:26-26.
Stroud, A., Tulanont, D., Coates, T., Goodney, P., & Croitoru, D. (2014). Epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia following minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 49(5):798-806.
Summers, R., Agarwal, S., & Johnston, C. (2020). Cardiac and Thoracic surgery chapter, The Royal College of Anaesthetists, (4th ed.), 13: 391-411
Suzuki, K., Saji, H., Aokage, K., Watanabe, S., Okada, M., & Mizusawa, J. (2019). Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: Safety results of a randomized trial. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 158(3):895-907.
Tomaszek, L., Fenikowski, D., Gawron, D., & Komotajtys, H. (2019) Comparative efficacy of continuous infusion of bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl for paediatric pain control after the Ravitch procedure and thoracotomy. A prospective randomized study. Biomedical Papers, 163(4):366-373.
Westphal F. (2019). Avaliação Invasiva do Mediastino. Cuidados Padronizados em Dreno de Tórax Tecnicas e Manejo., 12.2:184-190.
World Health Organization - WHO. (2015). International Agency for research on cancer (IARC). http:// epic.iarc.fr/research/cancerworkinggroups/lungcancer.php.
.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fernanda Donin Costanzo; Bárbara Viegas Sanches Machado; Marcelo Zanchet; Mayra Mejía Suárez; Fabiana Oenning da Gama; Vinicius Heurich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
