Ultrasonido obstétrico en el primer trimestre: Revisión de recomendaciones y limitaciones

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50026

Palabras clave:

Ecografía obstétrica, Embarazo, Primer trimestre.

Resumen

El presente artículo tiene como objetivo revisar las recomendaciones y limitaciones de la ecografía obstétrica en el primer trimestre, enfatizando su relevancia para el diagnóstico precoz, el seguimiento materno-fetal y el cribado de anomalías. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura en las bases de datos BVS y PubMed/MEDLINE, además del análisis de las guías de la SOGIRGS, la Asociación Médica Brasileña y el Ministerio de Salud. Se incluyeron artículos publicados en los últimos cinco años, en portugués, inglés y español. Los resultados muestran que la ecografía temprana es fundamental para el diagnóstico y la predicción de los desenlaces gestacionales, con alta precisión para la detección de malformaciones graves entre las semanas 11 y 14 de gestación. Sin embargo, limitaciones como la dependencia del operador, la variabilidad tecnológica y el riesgo de diagnósticos falsos refuerzan la necesidad de precaución. Se concluye que el examen es indispensable en la atención prenatal, pero debe interpretarse de manera complementaria, con estandarización de protocolos, capacitación profesional y actualización constante de las guías clínicas.

Referencias

ACOG. (2025). ACOG Clinical Practice Update: Coding, Billing, and Clinician Training for Detailed Fetal Anatomy Ultrasound in the First Trimester. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 143(6), 1111-4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005495.

AMB. (2020). Ultrassonografia no Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez. Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB).

https://amb.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ULTRASSONOGRAFIA-NO-PRIMEIRO-TRIMESTRE-DA-GRAVIDEZ-FINAL-12.09.2020.pdf.

Bollig, K. J. & Schust, D. J. (2020). Refining angular pregnancy diagnosis in the first trimester: a case series of expectant management. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 135(1), 175-84 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003595. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Danny-Schust/publication/337803313_Refining_Angular_Pregnancy_Diagnosis_in_the_First_Trimester_A_Case_Series_of_Expectant_Management/links/652403a63ab6cb4ec6d018ee/Refining-Angular-Pregnancy-Diagnosis-in-the-First-Trimester-A-Case-Series-of-Expectant-Management.pdf.

Bromley, B. & Platt, L. D. (2024). First-trimester obstetric ultrasonography in routine practice. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 143(6), 731-41. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005452.

Brown, I. et al. (2021). Ultrasound findings and detection of fetal abnormalities before 11 weeks of gestation. Prenatal Diagnosis. 41(13), 1675-84. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6055. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6055. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.

Brown, I., Rolnik, D. L., Fernando, S. et al. (2020). Ultrasound findings and detection of fetal abnormalities before 11 weeks of gestation. Prenatal Diagnosis. 40(8), 1062–70. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6055. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/rest/bitstreams/835d072c-7eff-5c80-844d-04ec01db4416/retrieve.

Buijtendijk, M. C. et al. (2024). First‐ and second‐trimester ultrasound for detection of fetal structural anomalies in unselected and low‐risk populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, n. 5, art. no. CD013455, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013455.pub2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38721874/.

Buijtendijk, M. F. et al. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024(5), CD014715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38721874/.

El-Achi, V. et al. (2020). First-trimester prediction of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 47(8), 624–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000506541.

Hamel, C. et al. (2024). Canadian Association of Radiologists Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 75(2), 261-8. DOI: 10.1177/08465371231185292. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37624360.

Hu, J. et al. (2021). Prospective evaluation of first‐trimester screening strategy for preterm pre‐eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 58(4), 529–39. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23645. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23645.

Karim, J. N. et al. (2024). Detection of non-cardiac fetal anomalies at the 11–14-week scan: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 63(4), 430–46. DOI: 10.1002/uog.26512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38547384/.

Karim, J. N. et al. (2022). First trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 59(1), 11–25.

Matarrelli, B. et al. (2025). Outcome of fetuses with early increased nuchal translucency: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 66(2), 147-54. DOI: 10.1002/uog.29260. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40519157.

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J. & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. Santa Maria: Editora da UFSM

Ramos, D., Santiago, J. C., Castillo, M. J. & Montoya, F. (2021). Fetal soft tissue edema and nuchal region with septations: Case report. Research, Society and Development. 10(6), e43936. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.43936. https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/43936/36338.

Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática versus revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, São Paulo. 20(2), v–vi.

Salomon, L. J. et al. (2024). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (Issue 2), Art. No.: CD014715. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2.

Salvesen, K. et al. (2021). ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler for fetal ultrasound examination in the first 13 + 6 weeks of pregnancy (updated). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 57, 1020. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23610.

https://www.isuog.org/static/50ee8d91-0264-4343-970b33f730b6508e/ISUOG-Safety-Statement-on-Doppler.pdf. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.

Schiffer, V. et al. (2020). Spiral artery blood flow during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1), 680. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03150-0. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33176723.

Shainker, S. A. et al. (2021). Relatório Especial da Sociedade de Medicina Materno-Fetal Placenta Accreta Spectrum Ultrasound Marker Task Force: Consenso sobre definição de marcadores e abordagem do exame de ultrassom em gestações com risco de espectro de placenta acreta. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 224(1), B2-B14,. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.001. Errata em: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 225(1):91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.012.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 104, 333–9.

SOGIRGS. (2025). Ultrassonografia no Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez. SOCIEDADE DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL (SOGIRGS). https://sogirgs.org.br/area-do-associado/ultrassonografia-no-primeiro-trimestre-da-gravidez.pdf.

SOGIRGS; Bilardo, C. M., Chaoui, R., Hyett, J. A., Kagan, K. O., Karim, J. N., Papageorghiou, A. T.; POON, L. C., Salomon, L. J., Syngelaki, A. & Nicolaides, K. H. (2023). Diretrizes práticas da ISUOG (atualizadas): realização de ultrassonografia de 11 a 14 semanas. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 61, 127-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26106.

Timor-Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A. & Goldstein, S. R. (2024). Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound screening for cesarean scar pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean delivery: analysis of the evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 230, 618-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.041.

Umans, E. et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Imaging in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 51(4), 343-56. DOI: 10.1159/000538243. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38493764.

Van Eekhout, J. C. A. et al. (2025). First-trimester prediction models based on maternal characteristics for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 132(3), 243–65. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17983. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17983. Acesso em: 27 set. 2025.

Vena, F. et al. (2022). Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy with diagnosis of chorionic bump on first-trimester sonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 35(25), 8897–904. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2006627. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34809513/.

Yu, L. et al. (2023). Diagnostic performance of first-trimester ultrasound for cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenatal Diagnosis. 43(1), 16–26, jan. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6266. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37307333/.

Zhang, L., Zhang, Y. & Yan, Y. (2023). The value of nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasonography for fetal malformation screening. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, v. 28, n. 2, p. 157–161, fev. 2025.

Zhi, R. et al. Association between transabdominal uterine artery Doppler and small-for-gestational-age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1), 659. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05968-w. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37704965.

Publicado

2025-11-17

Número

Sección

Revisiones

Cómo citar

Ultrasonido obstétrico en el primer trimestre: Revisión de recomendaciones y limitaciones. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 11, p. e137141150026, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i11.50026. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50026. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.