Evaluation of mechanical finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-cured acrylic resins

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i7.49216

Keywords:

Surface properties, Acrylic resins, Dental prosthesis.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different mechanical finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microwave-polymerized thermally activated acrylic resin (TAAC) samples. For this purpose, 50 samples were prepared in TAAC polymerized by microwave energy and distributed into 5 groups according to the finishing and polishing protocol (n = 10): GC (no treatment), G1 (only drills), G2 (drills and lathe), G3 (drills, sandpaper and lathe) and G4 (drills, rubber and lathe). The surface roughness evaluation was performed by the average of five readings on a portable roughness meter with a measurement path configured with an excursion of 0.25 µm and a speed of 0.5 mm/s. The mean surface roughness values ​​for each group were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test (comparison between experimental and control groups) and Kruskal-Wallis (comparison between experimental groups), with a 95% confidence interval. The surface roughness results show that there was a statistically significant difference between the GC and the other experimental groups (P<0.001). Among the experimental groups, there was a statistically significant difference between group G1 (1.34 Ra) and the other groups (p = 005151). However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups G2 (1.45 Ra), G3 (1.45 Ra) and G4 (1.45 Ra). It was concluded that finishing the surface of the RAAT with drills associated with polishing with sandpaper, rubber and lathe results in smoother surfaces with less potential for biofilm accumulation.

References

Abuzar, M. A., Bellur, S., Duong, N., Kim, B. B., Lu, P., Palfreyman, N., Surendran, D. & Tran, V. T. (2010). Evaluating surface roughness of a polymide denture base material in comparison with poly: (methyl methacrylate). Journal Of Oral Science. 52 (4): 577-81. doi: http://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.577.

Akamine, C. T. & Yamamoto, R. K. (2009). Estudo dirigido: estatística descritiva. (3ed). Editora Érica.

Al-Kheraif, A. A. A. (2014). The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized and visible light-polymerized acrylic denture base resins. The Saudi Dental Journal. 26 (2): 56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.007.

Alqutaibi, A. Y., Baik, A., Almuzaini, S. A., Farghal, A. E., Alnazzawi, A. A., Borzangy, S., Aboalrejal, A. N., AbdElaziz, M. H., Mahmoud, I. I. & Zafar, M. S. (2023). Polymeric Denture Base Materials: A Review. Polymers (Basel). 15: 3258. doi.org/10.3390/polym15153258.

Al-Rifaiy, M. Q. (2010). The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins. The Saudi Dental Journal. 22 (1): 13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2009.12.006.

Anusavice k.J. & Phillips - Materiais Dentários. 2005, 11a Ed; Elsevier LTDA.

Barbosa, D. G. O., Montenegro, A. C. & Duarte, J. L. P. (2013). Avaliação da rugosidade superficial de três resinas acrílicas para restauração provisória submetidas a diferentes métodos de polimento. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia. 70 (2): 152-5.

Bekman, O. R. & Costa Neto, P. L. O. (2009). Análise estatística da decisão. (2ed). Ed. Edgar Blucher.

Corsalini, M., Boccaccio, A., Lamberti, L., Pappalettere, C., Catapano, S. & Carossa, S. (2009). Analysis of the performance of a standardized method for the polishing of methacrylic resins. Open Dent J. 3: 233–40. doi: 10.2174/1874210600903010233.

Estrela, C. (2018). Metodologia Científica: Ciência, Ensino, Pesquisa. Editora Artes Médicas.

Gungor, H., Gundogdu, M. & Yesil, D. Z. (2014). Investigation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of denture base and repair materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 112: 1271–7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.023.

Oliveira, L. V., Mesquita, M. F., Henriques, G. E, Consani, R. L. & Fragoso, W. S. (2008). Effect of polishing technique and brushing on surface roughness of acrylic resins. J Prosthodont. 17 (4): 308-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00274.x.

Onwubu, S. C. & Mdluli, P. S. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Abrasive Materials and Polishing System on the Surface Roughness of Heat-Polymerized Acrylic Resins. Eur J Dent. 16 (3): 573-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736293.

Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Ed.UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Quezada MM, Salgado H, Correia A, Fernandes C, Fonseca P. Investigation of the Effect of the Same Polishing Protocol on the Surface Roughness of Denture Base Acrylic Resins. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8):1971. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081971.

Rao, D. C., Kalavathy, N., Mohammad, H. S., Hariprasad, A. & Kumar, C. R. (2015). Evaluation of the surface roughness of three heat-cured acrylic denture base resins with different conventional lathe polishing techniques: A comparative study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 15 (4): 374-80. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164910.

Raszewski, Z., Nowakowska-Toporowska, A., Nowakowska, D. & Więckiewicz, W. (2021). Update on acrylic resins used in dentistry. Mini Rev Med Chem. 21 (15): 2130–7. doi: 10.2174/1389557521666210226151214.

Shitsuka et al. (2014). Matemática fundamental para a tecnologia. São Paulo: Ed. Érica. Vieira, S. (2021). Introdução à bioestatística. Ed.GEN/Guanabara Koogan.

Zafar, M. S. (2020). Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers (Basel). 12 (10): 2299. doi: 10.3390/polym12102299.

Published

2025-07-28

Issue

Section

Health Sciences

How to Cite

Evaluation of mechanical finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of heat-cured acrylic resins. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 7, p. e8914749216, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i7.49216. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/49216. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.