Economic viability of productive backyard gardens in agrarian reform settlements in southeastern Pará

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i5.50989

Keywords:

Productive backyards, Family farming, Rural sustainability, Non-monetary income.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how the integration of sustainable practices can contribute to strengthening the economic structure of rural settlements, guaranteeing their productive autonomy and expanding their contribution to sustainable development. It is based on the assumption that the viability of these systems depends not only on monetary income, but also on indirect benefits such as self-sufficiency and reduced expenses. Methodologically, a descriptive approach was adopted, based on observable gross revenue per item, considering only data with quantity and price, due to the absence of systematic records of costs and profits. The results show that the backyards present high productive diversity, including fruit trees, processing, and small-scale livestock farming. However, the generation of monetary income tends to be concentrated in a few higher value-added items, such as pulps and derivatives, with acerola pulp standing out in the Nova Vitória Settlement Project. In the backyards of the Deus te Ama Settlement Project, a larger productive scale and strong participation of products such as flour, pineapple, and pulps are observed. At the Nova Canaã Camp, the system is in the implementation phase, without observable revenue generation. The analysis demonstrates that productive diversity ensures flexibility, food security, and resilience, while processing and insertion into local markets boost income. Possible trade-offs are also identified, since commercial intensification can reduce diversity and compromise the social functions of the backyard. It is concluded that productive backyards are strategic systems, whose analysis should integrate economic, social, and environmental dimensions, valuing both monetary income and indirect benefits.

References

Abdoellah, O. S., et al. (2020). Homegarden commercialization: Extent, household characteristics, and effect on food security and food sovereignty in rural Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 15 (3), 797–815.

Aguinaldo, R. T., et al. (2016). Analysing price spreads and net margins of smallholder vegetable farmers in the southern Philippines. Acta Horticulturae, (1128), 271–276.

Almeida, L. S. D., & Gama, J. R. V. (2014). Quintais agroflorestais: Estrutura, composição florística e aspectos socioambientais em área de assentamento rural na Amazônia brasileira. Ciência Florestal, 24 (4), 1041–1053.

Alves, E. S. F., & Rayol, B. P. (2025). Agrobiodiversidade nos quintais agroflorestais da comunidade ribeirinha Ilha Saracá, em Limoeiro do Ajuru, nordeste paraense. Interações (Campo Grande), 26, e26174422.

Costa Neto, C., & Anjos, M. B. (2019). Dimensões sociais da sustentabilidade em assentamentos rurais no Brasil: Um enfoque teórico-metodológico. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria.

Fernandes, B. M. (2000). A formação do MST no Brasil. Editora Vozes.

Galhena, D. H., Freed, R., & Maredia, K. M. (2013). Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agriculture & Food Security, 2 (1), 8.

Garcia, B. N. R., Vieira, T. A., & Oliveira, F. D. A. (2017). Tree and shrub diversity in agroforestry homegardens in rural community in eastern Amazon. Floresta, 47 (4), 543.

Gathala, M. K., et al. (2021). Improving smallholder farmers’ gross margins and labor-use efficiency across a range of cropping systems in the Eastern Gangetic Plains. World Development, 138, 105266.

Gervazio, W., Bergamasco, S. M. P. P., Moreno-Calles, A. I., Yamashita, O. M., & Rocha, A. M. (2023). Sustentabilidade e bem viver segundo os agricultores familiares do Projeto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável São Paulo, na Amazônia norte mato-grossense, Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 61 (2), e255979.

Getahun, H., & Yirsaw, E. (2024). Contribution of homegarden agroforestry to household income generation and woody plant species diversity in Lay Armachiho District, Northern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environment and Development, 6 (2).

Grisa, C., & Schneider, S. (2008). “Plantar pro gasto”: A importância do autoconsumo entre famílias de agricultores do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 46 (2), 481–515.

Korpelainen, H. (2023). The role of home gardens in promoting biodiversity and food security. Plants, 12 (13), 2473.

Mdoda, L., & Nontu, Y. (2026). Assessing the determinants and impact of financial record-keeping among smallholder vegetable farmers in the Eastern Cape Province: An empirical study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, 1644827.

Moraes, J. L., Costa, K. J. S. D., & Rayol, B. P. (2024). Composição e diversidade de plantas nos quintais agroflorestais da comunidade de Genipaúba, Santa Bárbara do Pará. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 19 (1), 15–22.

Mwangi, V., et al. (2021). Assessing smallholder farmer’s participation in the wheat value chain in North-West Mt. Kenya. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 657744.

Navarro, Z., & Campos, S. K. (2013). A “pequena produção rural” no Brasil. In Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE), A pequena produção rural e as tendências do desenvolvimento agrário brasileiro: Ganhar tempo é possível? CGEE.

Nunes, T. C., & Neto, M. F. D. C. (2024). Agrobiodiversidade em quintal agroflorestal no município de Manaus, Amazonas. Sustentabilidade International Scientific Journal, 1 (2).

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [Free ebook]. Editora da UFSM.

Risemberg, R. I. C. et al. (2026). A importância da metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de artigos científicos. E-Acadêmica, 7(1), e0171675. https://eacademica.org/eacademica/article/view/675.

Santos, L. R. D. J., & Araújo, V. M. (2024). Questões agrárias: Agricultura familiar, acesso à terra e produção para autoconsumo. Cadernos CERU, 35 (2), 47–62.

Whitney, C. W., et al. (2017). Homegardens and the future of food and nutrition security in southwest Uganda. Agricultural Systems, 154, 133–144.

Published

2026-05-01

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

How to Cite

Economic viability of productive backyard gardens in agrarian reform settlements in southeastern Pará. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 5, p. e0515550989, 2026. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v15i5.50989. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50989. Acesso em: 4 may. 2026.