Emotional bonding with Artificial Intelligence in loneliness: A neuropsychological perspective from a case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i12.50381Keywords:
Loneliness, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Neuropsychology, Social Cognition.Abstract
This clinical case study aims to analyze, from a neuropsychological perspective, the repercussions of intensive use of artificial intelligence (AI) as an emotional companion on cognitive and affective functions, as well as to reflect on its clinical and ethical implications. A qualitative, exploratory case study design was adopted. The research was based on the hypothesis that recurrent use of artificial agents may function as a substitute for human bonding, negatively impacting social cognition and reinforcing patterns of affective avoidance. Grounded in an integrative literature review and in the neuropsychological assessment of the participant, the study integrated data obtained through clinical interviews, psychometric tests, projective techniques, and the Loneliness and AI Attachment Scale (SVIA), developed specifically for this investigation. The results indicated preservation of overall intellectual functioning, with specific vulnerabilities in executive functions, particularly cognitive flexibility and social cognition. High inhibitory control, low affective spontaneity, and a strong preference for artificial bonds were also observed, suggesting a defensive pattern compatible with schizoid traits. These findings reinforce warnings in the literature regarding the emotional and cognitive impacts of digitally mediated loneliness. From a clinical and ethical standpoint, the study highlights the importance of interventions that take into account the effects of technology on attachment processes. Psychotherapy focused on social cognition, strengthening relational experiences, and the progressive integration of affect is recommended. This research contributes to expanding the debate on the use of AI in affective contexts, proposing a critical reflection on its risks and possibilities.
References
Abreu, C. N., Eisenstein, E., & Estefenon, S. (2008). Dependência de internet e de jogos eletrônicos: Uma revisão. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 30(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462008000200014
Abreu, C. N., Eisenstein, E., & Estefenon, S. G. B. (2013). Vivendo esse mundo digital: impactos na saúde, na educação e nos comportamentos sociais. Artmed Editora.
Alencar, M. V. M. (2008). Saúde mental e aprendizagem: O brincar como instrumento de avaliação psicológica [Monografia de pós-graduação, Universidade Federal do Ceará]. Repositório Institucional da UFC. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/38209
Amaral, A. E. V. (2017). As Pirâmides Coloridas de Pfister (5ª ed.). Hogrefe.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5ª ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Andrade, Q., & Silva, C. (2023). Revisão da Literatura Sobre Assistentes Virtuais para Apoio Psicológico Utilizando Inteligência Artificial. In Anais da XXIII Escola Regional de Computação Bahia, Alagoas e Sergipe, (pp. 9-18). Porto Alegre: SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/erbase.2023.236057
Brickenkamp, R., Schmidt-Atzert, L., & Liepmann, D. (2019). Teste d2 – Revisado (d2-R) (2ª ed.). Hogrefe.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005
Conselho Federal de Psicologia. (2019). Resolução CFP nº 006/2019, de 29 de março de 2019. Institui regras para a elaboração de documentos escritos produzidos pela(o) psicóloga(o) no exercício profissional. https://atosoficiais.com.br/cfp/resolucao-do-exercicio-profissional-n-6-2019
Conselho Regional de Psicologia – 9ª Região. (2015). Caderno de orientação ao trabalho do(a) profissional psicólogo(a) (2ª ed.). CRP-09.
Cunha, J. A. (2001). Manual da versão em português das Escalas Beck. Casa do Psicólogo.
Del Prette, A., & Del Prette, Z. A. P. (2001). Inventário de Habilidades Sociais (IHS). Casa do Psicólogo.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Feijó, L. P., Serafini, S., & Fogaça, T. (2013). Reflexão conceitual e empírica da importância dos instrumentos de entrevista inicial: Anamnese e genograma. Anais da Mostra de Iniciação Científica do CESUCA. https://ojs.cesuca.edu.br/index.php/mostrac/article/view/448
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Gorenstein, C., & Andrade, L. (1998). Beck Depression Inventory: Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 25(5), 245–250. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284700806_Inventario_de_depressao_de_Beck_Propriedades_psicometricas_da_versao_em_portugues
Jantara, R. D., Abreu, D. P. G., de Paula, A. C. S. F., Jantara, A., & da Silva Ziani, J. (2024). Isolamento social e solidão em estudantes universitários: revisão integrativa de literatura. Revista de Enfermagem e Atenção à Saúde, 13(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18554/reas.v13i3.5930 (https://seer.uftm.edu.br/revistaeletronica/index.php/enfer/article/view/5930)
Kim, N., & Katagiri, K. (2024). The paradox of connection: mutual following’s impact on loneliness among older adults in online networks. Innovation in Aging, 8(Suppl 1), 208. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0673
Kretzschmar, K., Tyroll, H., Pavarini, G., Manzini, A., & Singh, I. (2019). Can your phone be your therapist? Biomedical Informatics Insights, 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178222619829083
Lins, M., & Borsa, J. (2017). Avaliação psicológica: Aspectos teóricos e práticos. Vozes.
Martins, P. A. P. C. (2015). Escuta ativa nos cuidados de enfermagem: Uma intervenção confortadora [Tese de doutorado, Universidade de Lisboa]. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/18342
Livesley, W. J., & Larstone, R. (2018). Handbook of Personality Disorders. Guilford Press. https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=uLk8DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Livesley+%26+Larstone,+2018&ots=KZp33uiQqk&sig=1AQyteiKqanxGJjO8wFo6o_vXYk#v=onepage&q=Livesley%20%26%20Larstone%2C%202018&f=false
Mushtaq, R., Shoib, S., Shah, T., & Mushtaq, S. (2014). Relationship between loneliness, psychiatric disorders and physical health ? A review on the psychological aspects of loneliness. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 8(9), WE01–WE4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/10077.4828
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free ebook]. Santa Maria: Editora da UFSM.
Oliveira, M. S., & Rigoni, M. S. (2014). Figuras complexas de Rey: Teste de cópia e de reprodução de memória de figuras geométricas complexas (2ª ed.). Pearson Clinical Brasil.
Paula, J. P., & Malloy-Diniz, L. F. (2018). Teste de Aprendizagem Auditivo-Verbal de Rey (RAVLT). Vetor.
Rivero, A., Abreu, N., & Malloy-Diniz, L. (2014). Neuropsicologia da aprendizagem e memória. (2ª ed.). Artmed.
Rueda, F. J. M. (2013). Bateria Psicológica para Avaliação da Atenção (BPA). Vetor.
Sedó, M., Paula, J. J., & Malloy-Diniz, L. (2015). Five Digit Test – Teste dos cinco dígitos (FDT). Hogrefe.
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
Silva, F. C., & Lima, F. F. V. (2023). IPHEXA – Inventário de Personalidade e Habilidades Emocionais e Afetivas. Vetor.
Sisto, F. F., Santos, A. A. A., & Noronha, A. P. P. (no prelo). R-1: Teste não verbal de inteligência – Forma B. Vetor.
Tardivo, L. S. L. P. C., Moraes, M. C. V., Marques, A. M., & Tosi, S. M. V. D. (2024). A técnica do desenho da casa-árvore-pessoa (HTP): Avaliação psicológica no contexto brasileiro. São Paulo: Vetor Editora.
Toassi, R. F. C. & Petry, P. C. (2021). Metodologia científica aplicada à área da saúde. (2ed). Eitora da UFRGS.
Vaidyam, A. N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J. D., Kashavan, M. S., & Torous, J. B. (2019). Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: A review of the psychiatric landscape. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(7), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719828977
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cliciane da Silva Monteiro, Letícia Martins Ribeiro Candido
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
