Structural, morphological, and chemical evaluation of commercial graphene using different analytical techniques

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i1.50462

Keywords:

Nanomaterial, Graphene, Characterization, Structure.

Abstract

Graphene is a two-dimensional nanomaterial consisting of a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, whose properties were theoretically described by Wallace in 1946. Currently, it stands out for its high mechanical strength, high electrical and thermal conductivity, and large specific surface area, characteristics that make it promising for various technological applications. However, the production and characterization of graphene still represent challenges, since structural defects, impurities, and variations in the synthesis method may compromise its properties. In this context, this study aimed to characterize a commercial graphene using structural, morphological, and chemical techniques. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were employed. The results indicated the predominance of a well-organized structure, with residual presence of oxygen-containing groups, partial stacking of the sheets, and a moderate number of layers. Raman analysis evidenced a low density of defects and good organization of the carbon network, while the micrographs revealed thin, lamellar, and partially overlapped sheets. Thus, proper characterization of graphene is convenient and necessary to understand its properties and, consequently, to efficiently direct its application in different systems and technologies.

References

ASTM. (2015). ASTM INTERNATIONAL. ASTM E1508-15. Standard guide for selection and installation of materials for testing of electrical resistivity using the four-point probe method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

Ajala, O. J. et al. (2022). A critical review on graphene oxide nanostructured material: Properties, synthesis, characterization and application in water and wastewater treatment. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 18, 100673.

Cancado, L. G. et al. (2006). General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Applied Physics Letters. 88, 163106.

Cancado, L. G. et al. (2011). Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Letters. 11(8), 3190–6.

Chen, Q. et al. (2022). Effect of GO agglomeration on the mechanical properties of graphene oxide and nylon 66 composites and micromechanical analysis. Polymer Composites. 43(11), 8356–67.

Díez-Pascual, A. M. (2022). Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites: recent advances. Polymers, Basel. 14(10), 2102. Doi: 10.3390/polym14102102.

Dreyer, D. R. et al. (2000). The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chemical Society Reviews. 39(1), 228–40.

Ferrari, A. C. & Robertson, J. (2000). Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Physical Review B. 61(20), 14095.

Figueiredo, B. Q. de et al. (2022). Uso do grafeno e nióbio na prática médica: uma revisão narrativa de literatura. Research, Society and Development. 11(1), e255262022. Doi: 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25526.

Goncharova, N. N. et al. (2024). Estimation of graphene layers number and defectiveness of few-layered graphene particles by Raman spectroscopy. Advanced Materials & Technologies. 9(2), 84–90.

Husain, H. et al. (2025). Sustainable synthesis and structural characterization of carbon, graphite, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide derived from coconut shells. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 25(6), 1768–77. Doi: 10.22146/ijc.105467.

Hutapea, J. A. A. et al. (2025). Comprehensive review of graphene synthesis techniques: advancements, challenges, and future directions. Micro. 5(3), 40. Doi: 10.3390/micro5030040.

ISO. (2017). ISO 29301:2017. Nanotechnologies — Quantification of graphene materials — Volumetric surface area measurement of graphene materials. Genebra: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

Kumar, R., Singh, R. & Kumar, S. (2023). Recent progress in graphene-based polymer nanocomposites: processing, characterization and applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, Amsterdam. 72, 245–52. Doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.145.

Liu, Y., Chen, W. D. & Jiang, D. Z. (2023). Effects of graphene and carbon nanotubes on mechanical enhancement and heat generation of rubber composites. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing. p. 012038.

Liu, Y., Wang, Z. & Chen, J. (2023). Surface chemistry and interfacial interactions of graphene in polymer composites. Polymer, Amsterdam. 276, 125885. Doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.125885.

May, A. et al. (2021). Grafeno: uma nova tecnologia para a agricultura. Research, Society and Development. 10(2), e128272021. Doi: 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12827.

Mbayachi, V. B. et al. (2021). Graphene synthesis, characterization and its applications: A review. Results in Chemistry. 3, 100163.

Olabi, A. G. et al. (2021). Application of graphene in energy storage device–A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 135, 110026.

Pereira, F. L. A., Brito, T. M. F., Silva, L. L. W. V., Oliveira, M. M. V., Santos, E. M. S. & Silva, R. A. C. (2023). Os benefícios da utilização do grafeno na construção civil. Research, Society and Development. 12(4), e407812023. Doi: 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.40781.

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. (Free ebook). Santa Maria. Editora da UFSM.

Shen, L. et al. (2021). Highly porous nanofiber-supported monolayer graphene membranes for ultrafast organic solvent nanofiltration. Science Advances. 7(37), eabg6263.

Skakunova, O. S. et al. (2023). X-ray dynamical diffraction by quasi-monolayer graphene. Scientific Reports. 13, 19432. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43269-6.

Urade, A. R., Lahiri, I. & Suresh, K. S. (2023). Graphene properties, synthesis and applications: a review. JOM. 75(3), 614–30.

Vieira, J. E. D. & Villar, E. (2016). Grafeno: Uma revisão sobre propriedades, mecanismos de produção e potenciais aplicações em sistemas energéticos. Revista Eletrônica de Materiais e Processos. 11(2), 54–7.

Xiong, J. et al. (2019). Improving mechanical and electrical properties of fluoroelastomer nanocomposites by incorporation of low content of reduced graphene oxide via fast evaporation mixing. Polymer Composites. 40(S2), E1495–E1503.

Yildiz, M. G. et al. (2019). CO₂ capture over amine functionalized MCM-41 and SBA-15: exploratory analysis and decision tree classification of past data. Journal of CO₂ Utilization. 31, 27–42.

Yu, W. et al. (2020). Progress in the functional modification of graphene/graphene oxide: A review. RSC Advances. 10(26), 15328–45.

Zancanaro, D. A. & Polentto, M. (2022). Pirólise assistida por micro-ondas de resíduos de poliestireno expandido utilizando carvão ativado e óxido de grafeno. Research, Society and Development. 11(16), e379202022. Doi: 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37920.

Zhang, H., Li, X. & Zhao, Y. (2024). Structure–property relationships of graphene-based polymer composites: a comprehensive review. Journal of Materials Science. 59, 3245–72. Doi: 10.1007/s10853-023-09241-6.

Zhang, Z. et al. (2025). Surface energy distribution of modified carbon black and interfacial interactions of filled rubber composites. Langmuir.

Zhou, M. et al. (2022). A multi-scale analysis on reinforcement origin of static and dynamic mechanics in graphene-elastomer nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology. 228, 109617.

Published

2026-01-11

Issue

Section

Engineerings

How to Cite

Structural, morphological, and chemical evaluation of commercial graphene using different analytical techniques. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. e2215150462, 2026. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v15i1.50462. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50462. Acesso em: 23 jan. 2026.