Evaluation of the morphometric stability of the slot of metal orthodontic brackets using optical microscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i3.50599Keywords:
Orthodontics, Orthodontic Appliances, Morphometry, Optical Microscopy.Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphometric stability of the slots of metal orthodontic brackets from different commercial brands using optical microscopy. An in vitro experimental study was conducted in which 24 metal brackets for maxillary right central incisors with a 0.022” × 0.028” slot were evaluated, belonging to three commercial brands: American Orthodontics®, Morelli® Roth, and Azdent®. The slot dimensions in height, depth, and width were measured using high-precision optical microscopy. The data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, including the Shapiro–Wilk test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey post hoc test, adopting a significance level of 5%. The results showed that all brands presented oversized slot dimensions compared with the nominal values declared by the manufacturers, with statistically significant differences among the groups for all evaluated dimensions (p < 0.05). it was concluded that the slots of the evaluated brackets did not present full dimensional conformity, revealing morphometric variations among the analyzed brands. optical microscopy proved to be an effective and reliable method for evaluating the morphometric stability of these devices, highlighting the need for stricter quality control in orthodontic bracket manufacturing processes.
References
Al-Groosh, D. H., Albarkheel, A., & Aftan, N. L. (2024). Comparison of slot tolerance with manufacturing measurements of different stainless steel self-ligating brackets. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry, 36(4).
Bhalla, N. B., Good, S. A., McDonald, F., Sherriff, M., & Cash, A. C. (2010). Assessment of slot sizes in self-ligating brackets using electron microscopy. Australian Orthodontic Journal, 26(1), 38–41.
Cash, A. C., Good, S. A., Curtis, R. V., & McDonald, F. (2004). An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—Are standards as expected? Angle Orthodontist, 74(4), 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0450:AEOSSI>2.0.CO;2
Demling, A., Dittmer, M. P., & Schwestka-Polly, R. (2009). Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems. Head & Face Medicine, 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-5-27
Dolci, G. S., Spohr, A. M., Zimmer, E. R., & Marchioro, E. M. (2013). Assessment of the dimensions and surface characteristics of orthodontic wires and bracket slots. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 18(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512013000200011
Joch, A., Pichelmayer, M., & Weiland, F. (2010). Bracket slot and archwire dimensions: Manufacturing precision and third-order clearance. Journal of Orthodontics, 37(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653121043201
Meling, T. R., Ødegaard, J., & Meling, E. (1993). A theoretical evaluation of the influence of variation in bracket slot height and wire rounding on the amount of torsional play between bracket and wire. Kieferorthopädie Mitteilungen, 7(1), 41–48.
Meling, T. R., & Ødegaard, J. (1998). On bracket slot height: A methodological study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113(4), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70219-1
Nahidh, M., Yassir, Y. A., Marrapodi, M. M., Di Blasio, M., Ronsivalle, V., Cicciù, M., & Minervini, G. (2024). A scanning electron microscopy investigation of the precision of three orthodontic bracket slot systems. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03909-7
Pai, V. S., Pai, S. S., Krishna, S., & Swetha, M. (2011). Evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets: Are standards as expected? Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 45(3), 169–174.
Pérez, L. E. M., Díaz, R. R., Botello, G. R., & Olvera, S. P. (2014). Slot tolerance from three different commercial brands of brackets. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia, 2(1), 38–41.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Santa Maria: Editora UFSM.
Shitsuka, R., Shitsuka, D. M., & Pereira, A. S. (2014). Matemática fundamental para tecnologia (2ª ed.). São Paulo: Editora Érica.
Stone, A. C., & Allen, S. A. (2004). An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets—Are standards as expected? Angle Orthodontist, 74(4), 450–453.
Tangri, K., Kumar, P., Sharma, P., Kumar, K., Bagga, D. K., & Sharma, R. (2012). A comparison of the accuracy of 0.022 slots at face, base, mesial and distal surfaces of brackets marketed by different manufacturers. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(3), 132–136.
Vieira, S. (2021). Introdução à bioestatística. Rio de Janeiro: GEN/Guanabara Koogan.
Yassir, Y. A., El-Angbawi, A. M., McIntyre, G. T., Revie, G. F., & Bearn, D. R. (2018). A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: Part 2—Quality of treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics, 41(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy037
Yassir, Y. A., McIntyre, G. T., El-Angbawi, A. M., & Bearn, D. R. (2019). Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems? Angle Orthodontist, 89(4), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.2319/081918-608.1
Koaban, A. M. (2025). Recent advances in orthodontic brackets: From aesthetics to smart technologies. Cureus.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annie de J. Rosales Leyva, Lizbeth Rivero Paredes, Any L. Muñoz Vargas, Richard M. Cavero Gomez, Jhonny A. Montoya Alvarez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
