Materiales didácticos de bajo costo en la enseñanza de la producción

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i12.50237

Palabras clave:

Aprendizaje, Metodologías activas, Enseñanza, Materiales didácticos de bajo costo.

Resumen

Este estudio tiene como objetivo presentar un análisis del uso de materiales didácticos de bajo costo como herramientas de apoyo a la enseñanza práctica en los cursos de Gestión de la Producción y de Ingeniería de Producción, considerando su contribución a la eficacia de las metodologías activas y del aprendizaje basado en la experiencia. En un escenario educativo en constante evolución y ante la necesidad de alinear la formación técnica con las demandas contemporáneas del sector productivo, el estudio discute alternativas accesibles que fortalecen el compromiso de los estudiantes, favorecen la retención de contenidos y promueven el desarrollo de competencias técnicas y socioemocionales relevantes. El enfoque metodológico incluyó una revisión de la literatura realizada en las bases Scopus y Periódicos Capes, complementada por un análisis bibliométrico básico destinado a comprender el panorama científico sobre el tema. Los resultados indican un creciente interés académico por enfoques pedagógicos que integran teoría y práctica mediante recursos accesibles y de fácil implementación. El estudio concluye que los materiales didácticos de bajo costo constituyen herramientas viables para promover un aprendizaje más contextualizado, inclusivo y eficaz, especialmente en instituciones públicas que enfrentan restricciones presupuestarias.

Referencias

Althoff, M. (2009). Ensino superior e mercado de trabalho: Preparando graduandos para os desafios profissionais. Editora Acadêmica.

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Low cost kits in science education: Enhancing learning through hands on experiences. Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 45–52.

Casillas, J. C., & Moreno-Menéndez, A. M. (2014). Impact of experiential learning on the internationalization process of SMEs. International Business Review, 23(6), 1020–1031.

Costa, R. L. (2024). Mudanças competitivas no ensino superior: Preparando profissionais para o mercado atual. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 29(1), 112–130.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Finch, D. J., Hamilton, L. K., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2015). Developing employability skills through experiential learning: The role of emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 135–146.

Fromm, E., Van Dyke, M., Culver, R., & Hollander, R. (2021). Experiential learning in engineering education: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 1–15.

Garry, T. (2019). Utilizing technology and simulations to enhance science education for young learners. Science Education Review, 18(2), 34–47.

Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & O’Connor, B. (2016). Experiential learning in virtual environments: A case study of a virtual world for education. Computers & Education, 95, 212–223.

Hagos, T., & Lemma, A. (2025). Problem-based learning with scaffolding assisted by mobile technology: Enhancing students' understanding of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. Advance online publication.

Huang, D.-H. (2025). Innovative interactive instruction to enhance learning behaviors. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 100641.

Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Wu, T.-T., & Chen, N.-S. (2016). Eco discovery: Integrating environmental education through experiential learning. Environmental Education Research, 22(4), 583–600.

Jose, M., Silva, L., & Turner, S. (2017). Field based learning: Enhancing theoretical understanding through practical application. Journal of Outdoor Education, 21(3), 45–60.

Karami, M., & Tang, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME international performance: The mediating role of networking capability and experiential learning. International Small Business Journal, 37(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618807275

Konak, A., Dillon, T., & Smith, J. (2014). Experiential learning in cybersecurity education: Implementing virtual labs. Journal of Information Security Education, 12(1), 23–35.

Kwon, K., Kim, M., & Lee, J. (2019). Virtual reality in experiential learning: Enhancing student engagement and understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 65–76.

Lau, A. C., Henderson, C., Stains, M., et al. (2024). Characteristics of departments with high-use of active learning in introductory STEM courses: Implications for departmental transformation. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 10

Lênin, V. I. (1916). Cadernos filosóficos. Editora Progresso.

Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., Park, C. S., & Kim, H. (2015). Applying virtual reality in experiential learning: A study on immersive learning environments. Computers & Education, 85, 123–132.

Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Albort-Morant, G., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2019). Experiential learning and academic performance: A study on the mediating role of student engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 667–680.

Liqiu, Z., Wang, Q., Liu, L., & Ai, N. (2024). Teaching design for practical courses based on virtual simulation technology. Education Journal, 13(4), 242–248.

Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning: A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077.

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free ebook]. Santa Maria. Editora da UFSM.

Poore, J. A., Cullen, D. L., & Schaaf, M. (2014). Simulation based interprofessional education: A case study in nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(3), e129–e135.

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M., & Plamondon, K. (2015). Experiential learning in organizational settings: Fostering behavior change through practice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 467–488.

Rafael, S., & Justino, J. (2025). Active learning with technology: Developing practical skills with a flexible teaching platform. In Futureproofing Engineering Education for Global Responsibility (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems). Springer.

Roig, P. J., Alcaraz, S., Gilly, K., Bernad, C., & Juiz, C. (2024). Design and assessment of an active learning-based seminar. Education Sciences, 14(4), 371.

Sauaia, A. C. A. (1995). Jogos de empresas: O uso de simulações empresariais como ferramenta de ensino. Atlas.

Seaman, J., Brown, M., & Quay, J. (2017). The evolution of experiential learning theory: Tracing lines of research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(4), 327–342.

Shitsuka, R. et al. (2014). Matemática fundamental para tecnologia. (2ed). Editora Érica.

Silva, A. L. dos R., Freitas Lira, B. R., & Ruela, G. A. (2024). Importance of active teaching-learning methodologies in higher education: An integrative review. Research, Society and Development, 13(4), e7313445360.

Tomkins, L., & Ulus, E. (2016). Experiential learning and critical reflection: Exploring the dynamics of learning through experience. Management Learning, 47(1), 50–64.

Wurdinger, S., & Allison, P. (2017). Faculty perceptions and use of experiential learning in higher education. Journal of E Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1), 27–38.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-12-04

Número

Sección

Ensenanza y Ciencias de la Educación

Cómo citar

Materiales didácticos de bajo costo en la enseñanza de la producción. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 12, p. e24141250237, 2025. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v14i12.50237. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50237. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.