The integrated interpretation of laboratory tests in biomedical practice: Limits of fragmented reading and contemporary perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i1.50574Keywords:
Clinical laboratory techniques, Laboratory diagnosis, Clinical pathology, Biological Science Disciplines, Clinical reasoning.Abstract
Advances in analytical technologies and increased access to laboratory testing have generated a growing volume of information available for clinical practice. However, fragmented interpretation of laboratory results, focused on isolated parameters, may limit the understanding of complex pathophysiological processes. This article aims to discuss the importance of integrated interpretation of laboratory tests in biomedical practice, analyzing the limitations of compartmentalized readings and highlighting contemporary perspectives in Laboratory Medicine. This is a narrative and analytical review based on national and international scientific literature. The analysis demonstrates that integrating hematological, biochemical, and inflammatory tests enhances diagnostic potential, supports the identification of pathophysiological patterns, and improves clinical decision-making. It is concluded that valuing an integrated interpretative approach strengthens biomedical practice and contributes to a more critical and systemic Laboratory Medicine.
References
Azevedo, C. B. (2018). Metodologia científica ao alcance de todos. Editora Manole.
Bain, B. J. (2015). Blood cells: A practical guide (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Bain, B. J. (2020). The full blood count: A powerful diagnostic tool. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, 42(1), 17–25.
Casarin, S. T., Porto, A. R., Gabatz, R. I. B., Bonow, C. A., Ribeiro, J. P., & Mota, M. S. (2020). Tipos de revisão de literatura. Journal of Nursing and Health, 10(n. esp.), e20104031.
DB Diagnósticos. (2025). Exames laboratoriais: Tudo o que você precisa saber.
https://www.diagnosticosdobrasil.com.br/artigo/exames-laboratoriais-tudo-o-que-voce-precisa-saber
Fernandes, J. M. B., Vieira, L. T., & Castelhano, M. V. C. (2023). Revisão narrativa enquanto metodologia científica significativa: Reflexões técnico-formativas. REDES – Revista Educacional da Sucesso, 3(1), 1–7.
Furman, D., et al. (2019). Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nature Medicine, 25, 1822–1832.
Gil, A. C. (2017). Como elaborar um projeto de pesquisa. Atlas.
Lippi, G., & Plebani, M. (2020). Integrated diagnostics: The future of laboratory medicine? Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 58(7), 1–4.
Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Editora da UFSM.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2), v–vi.
Silva, A. R., Santos, M. C., & Oliveira, J. F. (2024). The role of laboratory diagnostics in clinical decision-making in health care services. Research, Society and Development, 13(5), e12345567. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i5.5567
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ary Guedes Porto Duarte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
