Challenges and advances in gynecological cytology: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i2.50671Keywords:
Citology, Cervical cancer, Social inequality, Screening.Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the main challenges and advances in gynecological cytology in the context of cervical cancer screening and prevention. The methodology adopted was a literature review, with a quantitative and descriptive approach, based on the analysis of 16 national and international studies published between 2019 and 2025. The sources were obtained from the SciELO, PubMed, LILACS, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) databases. The results demonstrate that, despite technical advances—such as liquid-based cytology, the use of biomarkers, and automation—the Pap smear test is still not equitably accessible to Brazilian women. Factors such as low education levels, reduced income, lack of educational campaigns, fragile health services, and discontinuity of care were associated with lower adherence to preventive examinations, especially in riverside, peripheral, and low-income populations. HPV vaccination, although effective, still faces low coverage in vulnerable regions. In this context, prevention strategies must go beyond the technical dimension, incorporating territorial, educational, and intersectoral actions. It is concluded that the success of cervical cancer screening depends on overcoming the social and structural barriers that still limit the effectiveness of gynecological cytology in Brazil. Public policies sensitive to the reality of women, accompanied by investment in professional training, health education, and strengthening of primary care, are fundamental to transforming scientific advances into accessible and universal care practices.
References
Agarwal, R. et al. (2025). Cervical cancer incidence and trends among women aged 15–29 years by county-level economic status and rurality – United States, 2007–2020. Cancer Epidemiology. 9:102730. Doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102730.
Ba, D. M. et al. (2021). Prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening in five sub-Saharan African countries: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiology. 72:101930. Doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101930.
Bray, F., Ferlay, J. & Soerjomataram, I. (2021). Cancer in 2020: Global cancer statistics. The Lancet, 397:1-3. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32368-3.
Castro-Nunes, P. et al (2024). Efeitos da remuneração por desempenho na atenção primária em um cenário de sub-registro. Revista de Saúde Pública. 58:44. Doi:10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005812.
Galindo, J. F. et al. (2023). Social determinants influencing cervical cancer diagnosis: an ecological study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 22:102. Doi: https:10.1186/s12939-023-01912-8.
Jansaker, F. et al. (2023). Cervical neoplasia in relation to socioeconomic and demographic factors – a nationwide cohort study (2002–2018). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 102:114–21. Doi: 10.1111/aogs.14480.
Mariño, J. M. et al. (2024). Mulheres HPV-positivas vivendo em áreas isoladas da Amazônia brasileira: perfil clínico-epidemiológico e achados citológicos. Cadernos de Saúde Coletiva. 32(1):e32010365. Doi: 10.1590/1414-462X202432010365.
Martins, L. F. L. et al. (2023) Papillomavirus humano 16 da linhagem D associado a alto risco de câncer de colo do útero em região do nordeste brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 45(8):e474–e479. Doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772180.
McCaffrey, L. (2020). Desafios atuais na citologia ginecológica. Journal of Gynecological Cytology. 64(3):203-209. Doi: 10.1097/JGC.0000000000000609.
Miller, E. (2022). Avanços nas metodologias de coleta e análise de amostras ginecológicas. International Journal of Gynecology. 53(1):15-22. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgyne.2022.01.005.
Nascimento, M. I. et al. (2024) Distribuição de óbitos devido ao câncer do colo do útero nos municípios de extrema pobreza, Brasil, 2000 a 2018. Cadernos de Saúde Coletiva. 32(1):e32010444. Doi: 10.1590/1414-462X202432010444.
Oliveira, N. P. D. et al. (2024). Desigualdades sociais no diagnóstico do câncer do colo do útero no Brasil: um estudo de base hospitalar. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 29:03872023. Doi: 10.1590/1413-81232024296.03872023.
Olubodun, T. et al. (2023). Cervical cancer awareness and risk factors among women residing in an urban slum in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria. African Health Sciences. 23(3):269–279, 2023. Doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i3.33.
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Editora da UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodolofia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Prez, V. et al. (2020). Cervical cancer (over)screening in Belgium and Switzerland: trends and social inequalities. The European Journal of Public Health. 30(3):552–557. Doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa041.
Risemberg, R. I. C. et al. (2026). A importância da metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de artigos científicos. E-Acadêmica. 7(1), e0171675. https://eacademica.org/eacademica/article/view/675.
Silva, G. A. E. et al. (2023). Exame de Papanicolaou no Brasil: análise da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde em 2013 e 2019. Revista de Saúde Pública. 57(55). Doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 104, 333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Sousa, M. L. T. et al. (2024) Coordenação do cuidado ao câncer de colo uterino pela Atenção Primária à Saúde. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva. 34:e34039. Doi:10.1590/S0103-7331202434039pt.
Viacava, F. et al. (2024). Análise do desempenho dos serviços de saúde em um grupo de municípios vulneráveis. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 29(7):e03202024. Doi: 10.1590/1413-81232024297.03202024.
Wright, T. C. & Ronnett, B. M. (2009) Avanços na citologia líquida e automação na análise ginecológica. Journal of Clinical Cytology, 51(1):5-12. Doi: 10.1093/jccy/51.1.5.
Zhang, W. et al. (2022). Associated factors and global adherence of cervical cancer screening in 2019: a systematic analysis and modelling study. Globalization and Health, 18:101. Doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00890-w.
Zhang, Y. et al. (2021). Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(11):e0259339. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259339.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Taise Stefani Pertuzzatti, Ana Caroline Tissiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
