Biotechnology in agriculture: A narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i9.49446Keywords:
Sustainable agriculture, Food security, Genetically modified organisms (GMOs).Abstract
Biotechnology has been consolidated as one of the main pillars of innovation in Brazilian agriculture, combining productivity gains with sustainable practices and reduced environmental impact. This article aims to conduct a narrative review on the advances, applicability, and perspectives of biotechnology in agriculture, with a focus on the Brazilian scenario. The methodology consisted of a narrative review carried out in databases such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering the period from 2018 to 2025. The results show that Brazil occupies a leading global position in the adoption of genetically modified crops, especially soybean, corn, and cotton, as well as in the rapid expansion of bioinput use. Among the main advances are biological nitrogen fixation and the development of beneficial microorganisms capable of improving nutrient uptake and strengthening plant resistance. New biotechnologies, such as gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9, emerge as promising alternatives to create more resilient cultivars. The review also highlights challenges, such as the need for continuous research investment, the establishment of clear regulatory frameworks, and the expansion of social acceptance. It is concluded that biotechnology in Brazilian agriculture is configured not only as an instrument of economic growth but also as a strategic pathway to ensure food security and preserve natural resources, consolidating the country as a global reference in sustainable agriculture.
References
Ablin, R., & Paz, N. (2001). Development of High Oleic Acid Soybean Oil. American Oil Chemists' Society.
Akshay Uike, A., Rawate, T., Bhoyer, S., & Chahande, J. (2024). A review of genetic engineering in agriculture: Techniques, applications, and societal implications. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 13(1), 1956-1964.
Anez, M. A. F. (2006). Fluxo gênico em plantas: uma abordagem sobre as implicações ambientais dos transgênicos. Embrapa.
Arantes, J. T. (2012). Cientistas defendem comunicação para rebater mitos sobre transgênicos. Agência FAPESP.
Barbosa, A. L. (2010). Regulamentação e bioética: um olhar sobre a CTNBio. Editora Fiocruz.
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA - a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
Bettiol, W., Morandi, M. A. B., & Pinto, Z. V. (2021). Controle biológico de doenças de plantas no Brasil. Embrapa.
Boccia, F. (2015). The bioethical implications of genetic engineering. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 8(1), 1-10.
Carvalho, F., et al. (2025). Probiotics for plants: Next-generation biofertilizers for a low-carbon agriculture. Trends in Biotechnology, 43(1), 1-15.
Chen, H., Teng, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2015). Contamination features and health risk of soil heavy metals in China. Science of the Total Environment, 512-513, 143-153.
Coelho, A. L. (2023). Percepção pública da biotecnologia agrícola no Brasil: desafios e caminhos. Editora Acadêmica.
Convenção sobre Diversidade Biológica. (1992). Texto da Convenção sobre Diversidade Biológica. Nações Unidas.
Croplife International. (2020). The safety of genetically modified foods.
CTNBio. (2017). Relatório Anual de Atividades. Comissão Técnica Nacional de Biossegurança.
Dejana, D., et al. (2022). The role of mycorrhizal fungi in nutrient uptake and soil aggregation. Journal of Soil Science, 73(4), 1120-1135.
Figueiredo, J. E. F., Faria, J. C., & Aragão, F. J. L. (2019). Biotecnologia e melhoramento de plantas no Brasil. Em A Saga da Biotecnologia no Brasil (pp. 123-145). Embrapa.
Freitas, J. R., et al. (2023). Soil microbiome engineering for enhanced plant nutrition and health. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 79, 102850.
Góes-Favoni, S. P. (2017). A percepção pública sobre transgênicos: o caso brasileiro. Revista de Estudos Sociais, 19(38), 112-130.
James, C. (2013). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Brief No. 46.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01.
Lenteren, J. C., van, et al. (2018). Biological control: an essential component of integrated pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 63, 229-250.
Lima, E. C., et al. (2024). The future of biofertilizers in Brazil: challenges and perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 48.
Lima, S. S., et al. (2018). Comunicação e percepção de risco sobre transgênicos: uma análise da mídia brasileira. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, 41(2), 173-190.
Lobato, F. (2019). Mercado de controle biológico cresce no Brasil. Embrapa.
Mota, A. (2014). Bioética e biotecnologia: um diálogo necessário. Revista Bioética, 22(1), 25-34.
Muñoz, A. J. (2002). Contaminación del suelo y del agua por residuos de agrotóxicos. Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Ortega, A. C. (2016). Desenvolvimento de soja com alto teor de aminoácidos essenciais. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.
Paterniani, E. (2001). Melhoramento genético de plantas: da domesticação à engenharia genética. ESALQ/USP.
Pereira, R., Silva, L., & Santos, M. (2018). Abordagens quantitativas e descritivas em revisões da literatura científica. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa Científica, 12(3), 45–56.
Ribeiro, M. M., & Marin, J. D. (2012). A complexidade da comunicação sobre transgênicos e a percepção pública. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17(3), 735-744.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2), v–vi. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001
Sánchez, A., et al. (2022). Glomalin-related soil protein: a key factor for soil structure and carbon sequestration. Geoderma, 412, 115715.
Santos, M. O., et al. (2024). Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for climate change resilience in crops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 137(1), 1-20.
Sharma, I., Dangi, A. K., & Shukla, P. (2018). Bioremediation of soils and wastewater contaminated with pesticides: A review. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 5(1), 23.
Sincisno, C. S. A., & Oliveira-Filho, E. C. (2013). Biorremediação: princípios e aplicações. Editora Interciência.
Souza, G. M., et al. (2025). The synergy between biotechnology and digital agriculture: perspectives for Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 27(1), 1-18.
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2009). Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 33(2), 425-448.
Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A., & Pisante, M. (2017). Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 4(1), 2
Steinberg, M. (2002). The life and work of Karl Ereky: A contribution to the history of biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28(6), 361-365.
Vargas, L., et al. (2018). The role of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(3), 321-338.
Vieira, L. G. E., et al. (2021). Biotechnology as a strategic pillar for Brazilian agribusiness. Agribusiness, 37(2), 235-251.
Xavier, M. A., et al. (2008). Eficácia de milho geneticamente modificado com a tecnologia Bt no controle de lagartas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 43(11), 1435-1441.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nicole Kássia Ramos de Sousa, Victor Hugo Tavares do Espirito Santo, Daniel Douglas de Souza Alves, Erikson Patrique de Moraes Zonoizo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
