Between individual rights and collective sustainability: Judicialization of access to medicines in the Unified Health System (UHS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v14i9.49573Keywords:
Health litigation, Unified Health System , Access to medicines.Abstract
This study conducted a systematic review to analyze the current landscape of the judicialization of healthcare in Brazil, particularly regarding the provision of medication within the Unified Health System (SUS). Based on the 1988 Federal Constitution and the Organic Health Law (Law No. 8,080/1990), the right to health was enshrined as a duty of the State, encompassing the distribution of medication. However, structural limitations, historical underfunding, and poor administrative management have compromised the effectiveness of this right, generating a growing demand for lawsuits. The results showed that over 60% of the lawsuits analyzed were granted, with cases predominantly related to chronic, neurological, and degenerative diseases, generally handled by the Public Defender's Office. It was observed that, although judicialization guarantees the fulfillment of the individual right to health, it also has negative impacts on SUS financing, such as the withholding of funds and the weakening of collective policies. On the other hand, it plays a driving role in updating the National List of Essential Medicines (RENAME), pressuring the government to incorporate new therapies. The conclusion is that judicialization should be understood as a multifaceted phenomenon, capable of revealing structural weaknesses in the SUS (Unified Health System) and, at the same time, fostering its improvement, requiring greater planning, transparency, and dialogue among administrators, health professionals, the judiciary, and civil society.
References
Araújo, I. C., & Machado, F. (2020). Judicialização da saúde em Manaus: análise das demandas judiciais entre 2013 e 2017. Saúde e Sociedade, 29(1), e190256. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902020190256
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília: Senado Federal.
Brasil. (1990). Lei Orgânica da Saúde: Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990. Brasília: Senado Federal.
Caetano, C. R., et al. (2021). Organização dos entes públicos para atender a judicialização do acesso a medicamentos no estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 26(11), 5561–5575. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320212611.32092020
Catanheide, I. D., et al. (2016). Características da judicialização do acesso a medicamentos no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática. Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva, 26(4), 1335–1356. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312016000400014
Finatto, R. B., et al. (2021). Equidade e judicialização de medicamentos: perfil das demandas à Secretaria de Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul pelos usuários de Porto Alegre. Revista de Direito Sanitário, 21(2), e0018. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2021.15863
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Morais, E., et al. (2020). Demandas judiciais para provisão de medicamentos de alto custo julgadas em segunda instância: aspectos sobre o estado de Minas Gerais. JAPHAC, 7(3), 99–107.
Oliveira, Y., et al. (2021). Judicialização no acesso a medicamentos: análise das demandas judiciais no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 37(1), e00174619. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00174619
Pandolfo, N., Delduque, D., & Amara, G. (2012). Aspectos jurídicos e sanitários condicionantes para o uso da via judicial no acesso aos medicamentos no Brasil. Revista de Salud Pública, 14(2), 340–349.
Ribeiro, I. V., Costa, A. V., & Sena, H. (2019). A inconstitucionalidade do manejo do sequestro e do bloqueio de contas da Fazenda Pública como mecanismo satisfativo. Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário, 8(1), 131–151.
Sales, O. C., et al. (2019). O sistema único de saúde: desafios, avanços e debates em 30 anos de história. Revista Humanidades e Inovação, 6(17), 54–65.
Santana, L. U., et al. (2021). Análise das demandas judiciais de idosos com diagnóstico de câncer no serviço público de saúde. Comunicações em Ciências da Saúde, 31(4), 1–25.
Schroer, J., et al. (2022). A política de assistência farmacológica e os critérios do fornecimento judicial de medicamentos no Rio Grande do Sul. O Social em Questão, 25(52), 15–20.
Souza, C. C., Figueiredo, S., & Guedes, D. M. (2020). Análise da origem das ações judiciais contra o estado de Pernambuco para fornecimento de medicamentos entre 2014 e 2016. EBIT, 5(1), 692–695.
Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Editora UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pedro José Nunes Ferreira Alves de Faria, Kilzy de Carvalho Almeida Cani, Renan Silva Pinto, Daniel Tineu Leite Maia, Carolina Alves Delpasso, David Ribeiro Costa, Davidson Ribeiro Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
