Resilience and Vulnerability of Antiretroviral Therapy Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Southern Africa: A systematic review and comparative synthesis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i4.50868

Keywords:

HIV, Antiretroviral Therapy, COVID-19.

Abstract

Southern Africa bears the highest global burden of HIV, and the COVID-19 pandemic posed an unprecedented threat to antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery systems. This study aimed to comparatively synthesize evidence on ART disruption, determinants of treatment abandonment, and epidemiological consequences across Southern Africa during the pandemic. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature sources were searched for studies published between January 2020 and December 2025. Eligible studies reported ART adherence, retention, or service disruption in Southern African countries. Data were extracted and synthesized using a structured comparative framework. Evidence from Mozambique, South Africa, Malawi, and multi-country modelling studies revealed that ART delivery systems were relatively resilient, while diagnostic and support services were substantially disrupted. Key determinants of treatment interruption included mobility restrictions, transport barriers, fear of COVID-19 infection, and suspension of community-based services. Mathematical models predicted that a 6-month interruption in ART among 50% of patients could increase HIV-related mortality by 1.63-fold, corresponding to approximately 296,000 excess deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite disruptions, several settings maintained viral suppression through adaptive strategies such as multi-month dispensing. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical structural vulnerabilities in HIV care systems, particularly in community service delivery and patient access. Ensuring uninterrupted ART supply and strengthening decentralized service models are essential to mitigate future health-system shocks.

References

Botswana Ministry of Health. (2022). Assessment of HIV service delivery during COVID-19. Gaborone: MoH.

Dorward, J., Khubone, T., Gate, K., Ngobese, H., Sookrajh, Y., Mkhize, S., et al. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on HIV care in 65 South African primary care clinics: an interrupted time series analysis. Lancet HIV. 8(3), e158–e165.

Grimsrud, A., Wilkinson, L., Eshun-Wilson, I., Sikazwe, I., Eholié, S. P., Amo-Addae, M. et al. (2021). Understanding engagement in HIV programmes: how health services can adapt to ensure no one is left behind. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 16(5), 303–310.

Hogan, A. B., Jewell, B. L., Sherrard-Smith, E., Vesga, J. F., Watson, O. J., Whittaker, C., et al. (2020). Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 8(9), e1132–e1141.

Jewell, B. L., Mudimu, E., Stover, J., Ten Brink, D., Phillips, A. N., Smith, J. A. et al. (2020). Potential effects of disruption to HIV programmes in sub-Saharan Africa caused by COVID-19: results from multiple mathematical models. Lancet HIV. 7(9), e629–e640.

Malawi Ministry of Health. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on HIV programme indicators. Lilongwe: MoH; 2021.

Ministério da Saúde (Moçambique). (2021). Relatório anual dos serviços de HIV/SIDA. Maputo: MISAU; 2021.

National Department of Health (South Africa). (2021). National Health Laboratory Service data report on HIV viral load testing during COVID-19. Pretoria: NDoH; 2021.

Page, M. J. et al. (2022). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 46, e112. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.112.

PEPFAR. (2022). Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free ebook]. Santa Maria: Editora da UFSM.

Risemberg, R. I. C. et al. (2026). A importância da metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de artigos científicos. E-Acadêmica, 7(1), e0171675. https://eacademica.org/eacademica/article/view/675.

Siedner, M. J., Kraemer, J. D., Meyer, M. J., Harling, G., Mngomezulu, T., Gabela, P. et al. (2020). Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 10, e043763.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier. 104(C), 333-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

UNAIDS. (2021). Global AIDS Update 2021: confronting inequalities—lessons for pandemic responses from 40 years of AIDS. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2021.

Weiser, S. D., Young, S. L., Cohen, C. R., Kushel, M. B., Tsai, A. C., Tien, P. C. et al. (2011). Conceptual framework for understanding the bidirectional links between food insecurity and HIV/AIDS. Am J Clin Nutr. 94(6), 1729S–1739S.

Wilkinson, L. & Grimsrud, A. (2020). The time is now: expedited HIV differentiated service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Int AIDS Soc. 23(5), e25503.

World Health Organization. (2020). Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context. Geneva: WHO; 2020.

Zambia Ministry of Health. (2021). Continuity of HIV services during COVID-19: programme report. Lusaka: MoH; 2021.

Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care. (2021). HIV programme performance report during COVID-19. Harare: MoHCC; 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-14

Issue

Section

Health Sciences

How to Cite

Resilience and Vulnerability of Antiretroviral Therapy Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Southern Africa: A systematic review and comparative synthesis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. e3615450868, 2026. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v15i4.50868. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/50868. Acesso em: 18 apr. 2026.