Humic substances and their effects on the micropropagation of banana

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12297

Keywords:

Bioactivity; Humic acid; Fulvic acid; Prata-Anã.

Abstract

The growing concern to promote sustainable agriculture, seeking environmental preservation and, at the same time, increased productivity resulted in the search for technologies for the implementation of agricultural production systems, with ecological approaches and responsible use of natural resources, in the economic, political and social contexts in each region. One of the potential alternatives to achieve these results would be the use of humic substances, considering their direct and indirect mechanisms aimed at increasing agricultural production. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the bioactivity of humic and fulvic acids, as well as to promote improvements in the phytotechnical attributes of banana cv. Prata-Anã micropropagated. The treatments consisted of five doses of humic acid and fulvic acid (2; 5; 10; 20 and 40 mg L-1) and a control without humic substances. Higher values ​​for the length of the aerial part and the larger root were obtained with the use of 40 mg L-1 fulvic acid. The results prove the ability of fulvic acid to improve the in vitro development of banana explants.

References

Ahama, I., Saquib R. U., Qasim M, Saleem M, Khan, A. S. & Yaseen, M. (2013). Humic acid and cultivar effects on growth, yield, vase life, and corm characteristics of gladiolus. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 73:339-344.

Baldotto, L. E. B. et al. (2014) Acclimatization of orchid (Cymbidium sp.) In response to the application of humic acids. Ciência Rural, 44(5): 830-833.

Baldotto, L. E. B. et al. (2009). Performance of pineapple 'Vitória' in response to the application of humic acids during acclimatization. Brazilian Journal of Soil Science, 33(4): 979-990.

Baldotto O, L. E. B. & Baldotto, M. A. (2015). Growth and production of ornamental sunflower grown in the field in response to application of humic acids. Ciência Rural, 45(6): 1000 -1005.

Baldotto, M. A., Rosa, R. C. C., Cannelas, L. P., Rangel, T. P., Salomão, M. S. M. B. & Rezende, C. E. (2011). Oxidation capacity as a stability index of sediment organic matter according to the river-estuarine gradient of the Paraíba do Sul River. Química Nova, 34(6): 973-978.

Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Okorokova-Façanha, A. L. & Façanha, A. R. (2002) Humic Acids Isoleted from Earthworm Compost Enhance Root Elongation, Lateral Root Emergence, and Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Activity in Maize Roots. Plant Physiollogy, 130(4): 1951-1957.

Da Silva, M. A. C. et al. (2015). Humic acids of vermicompost stimulate the in vitro growth of Cattleya warneri (Orchidaceae) seedlings. Rodriguésia, 66: 759-768.

Façanha, A.R., Façanha, A. R., Olivares, F. L., Velloso, A. C. X., Braz-Filho, R., Santos, G. A. & Canellas, L. P. (2002). Humic acid bioactivity: effects on proton development. Brazilian Agricultural Research, 37: 1301-1310.

Ferrara, G. & Brunetti, G. (2008). Influence of foliar applications of humic acids on yield and fruit quality of Table grape cv. Italy. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 42: 79 87.

Jannin, L., Arkoun, M.,Ourry, A., Laîné, P., Goux, D., et al. (2012). Microarray analysis of humic acid effects on Brassica napus growth: Involvement of N, C and S metabolisms. Plant Soil, 359:297-319.

Lima, A. A., Alvarenga, M. A. R., Rodrigues, L. & Carvalho, J. G. (2011). Leaf nutrient concentration and yield of tomato grown under different substrates and doses of humic acids. Horticultura Brasileira, 29: 63-69.

Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant.15: 473-497.

Pinton, R., Cesco, S., Santi, S., Agnolon, F. & Varanini, Z. (1999). Water extractable humic substances enhance iron deficiency responses by Fe deficient cucumber plants. Plant and Soil, 210:145-157.

Sharif, M., Khatttak, R. A. & Sarir, M. S. (2002) Effect of different levels of lignitic coal derived humic acid on growth of maize plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 33(19):3567-3580.

Silva Filho, G. N. & Vidor, C. Activity of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms in the presence of nitrogen, iron, calcium and potassium. Brazilian Agricultural Research, 36(12): 1495-1508.

Sladky, Z. (1985). The effect of humic substance extracts on the growth of tomato plants.Bio Plant, 1:142-150.

Swift, R. S. (1996). Characterization of organic matter. In: SPARKS, D.L., editor. Soil analysis methods. Soil Science Society of America, 1018-1020.

Yildirim, E. (2007). Foliar and soil fertilization of humic acid affect productivity and quality of tomato. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil Plant Sci, 57: 182-186.

Yvin, J. C. & Etienne, P. (2012) Microarray analysis of humic acid effects on Brassica napus growth: Involvement of N, C and S metabolisms. Plant Soil, 359:297-319.

Downloads

Published

10/02/2021

How to Cite

BUTTRÓS, V. H. T. .; PEREIRA, M. M. A. .; MARTINS, A. D. .; RODRIGUES, F. A. .; PASQUAL, M.; DÓRIA, J. Humic substances and their effects on the micropropagation of banana. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. e20510212297, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12297. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12297. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences