Surgical glove perforation during oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: An experimental study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15290

Keywords:

Oral surgical procedures; Oral and maxillofacial surgeons; Risk factors; Gloves surgical.

Abstract

Propouse: surgical teams sometimes neglect surgical glove perforation. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of sterile glove perforation in maxillofacial surgical procedures. Methods: Two studies were performed. The first one evaluated 200 pairs of surgical gloves (50 in each group) used by first, second, and third-year residents (R1,R2,R3). In the second study, 150 pairs of surgical gloves were evaluated: 100 pairs were used by a third-year resident, including 50 pairs in oral surgery procedures and 50 pairs in trauma surgeries, and 50 pairs of unused gloves were tested as control. The gloves were examined for perforations by filling them with water and testing for leaks. Results: In the first study, 29 pairs (19.3%) were perforated. Of the 50 pairs of control gloves, 7 pairs (14%) showed perforations on either side. The thumb and index finger and the right-hand (dominant hand) gloves, were the most frequently perforated sites. In the second study, 6% of the gloves in the control group, 6% of the gloves used in oral surgeries, and 10% of the gloves used in trauma surgeries showed perforations. The index finger and thumb were the most affected sites. Conclusion: The perforation rate was higher for the dominant right hand. In both studies, the frequency of perforation of unused gloves was significant, indicating the need for better quality control of the gloves evaluated in this study.

References

Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934.

Avery, C. M. E., Taylor, J., & Johnson, P. A. (1999). Double gloving and a system for identifying glove perforations in maxillofacial trauma surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 37(4), 316-319.

Bessa, M. M., Lima, L. S., Silva, M. D. M., & Freitas, R. J. M. (2020). Gloves as a preventive measure for Covid-19: who should use it? Research, Society and Development, 9(8): 1-10, e746974846.

Brandtner, C., Borumandi, F., Krenkel, C., & Gaggl, A. (2015). Blunt wires in oral and maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 53(3), 301-302.

Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. (2010). Primeiro desafio mundial para a segurança do paciente. Uso de luvas (técnico). Folha informativa 6: p2. Available in: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/servicosaude/controle/higienizacao_oms/folha%20informativa%20 6.pdf.

Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. (2011). Resolução no 55, de 4 de novembro de 2011. Estabelece os requisitos mínimos de identidade e qualidade para as luvas cirúrgicas e luvas para procedimentos não cirúrgicos de borracha natural, de borracha sintética, de mistura de borrachas natural e sintética e de policloreto de vinila, sob regime de vigilância sanitária. Available in: http://www.lex.com.br/doc_22237184_RESOLUCAO_N_55_DE_4_DE_NOVEMBRO_DE_ 2011.aspx.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2020). Protocolo de Tratamento do Novo Coronavírus (2019-nCoV). Tiragem: 1ª edição – 2020 – publicação eletrônica. Available in: https://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2020/fevereiro/05/Protocolo-de-manejo-clinico-para-o-novo-coronavirus-2019-ncov.pdf.

Burke, F. J., & Wilson, N. H. (1990). The incidence of undiagnosed punctures in non-sterile gloves. British dental journal, 168(2), 67-71.

Burke, F. J. T., Baggett, F. J., & Lomax, A. M. (1996). Assessment of the risk of glove puncture during oral surgery procedures. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 82(1), 18-21.

Fareedi, A. L. I., Chandra, P., Patil, K., & Tahasildar, S. (2016). Double gloving in dentistry: importance and recommendations: a review. International Arab Journal of Dentistry (IAJD), 7(1), 37-40.

Gaujac, C., Ceccheti, M. M., Yonezaki, F., Garcia Jr, I. R., & Peres, M. P. S. (2007). Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 65(10), 1922-1925.

Hardison, S. A., Pyon, G., Le, A., Wan, W., & Coelho, D. H. (2017). The effects of double gloving on microsurgical skills. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 157(3), 419-423.

Jid, L. Q., Ping, M. W., Chung, W. Y., & Leung, W. Y. (2017). Visible glove perforation in total knee arthroplasty: Risk and consequences. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 25(1), 2309499017695610.

Kumar, D., Shantanu, K., Kumar, M., Kumar, A., & Sharma, V. (2016). A Cross-sectional Analysis of Glove Perforation in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 10(3), 31.

Kuroyanagi, N., Nagao, T., Sakuma, H., Miyachi, H., Ochiai, S., Kimura, Y., Fukano, H., & Shimozato, K. (2012). Risk of surgical glove perforation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 41(8), 1014-1019.

Luize, P. B. (2018). Avaliação da Integridade de luvas cirúrgicas em um hospital oncológico no interior paulista. Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

Lutsky, K. F., Jones, C., Abboudi, J., Kirkpatrick, W., Liss, F., Leinberry, C., Ilyas, A., Martin, D., & Beredjiklian, P. K. (2017). Incidence of glove perforation during hand surgical procedures. The Journal of hand surgery, 42(10), 840-e1.

Makama, J. G., Okeme, I. M., Makama, E. J., & Ameh, E. A. (2016). Glove perforation rate in surgery: a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of double gloving. Surgical infections, 17(4), 436-442.

Manjunath, A. P., Shepherd, J. H., Barton, D. P. J., Bridges, J. E., & Ind, T. E. J. (2008). Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 115(8), 1015-1019.

Murta, E. F. C., Silva, C. S. D., & Ferreira, N. A. F. D. (2000). Perfuração de luvas durante cirurgias ginecológicas. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 22(4), 225-228.

Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). (2014). Salve Vidas: Higienize suas Mãos. Higiene das Mãos na Assistência à Saúde Extra-hospitalar e Domiciliar e nas Instituições de Longa Permanência - Um Guia para a Implementação da Estratégia Multimodal da OMS para a Melhoria da Higiene das Mãos e da Abordagem “Meus 5 Momentos para a Higiene das Mãos”; tradução de OPAS – Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 73 p.

Pérez-Serrano, M. E., Diniz-Freitas, M., Fernández-Feijoo, J., & Limeres-Posse, J. (2017). Glove perforations during routine dental hygienist procedures in a primary care setting. Atencion primaria, 50(2), 130-131.

Rodrigues, V. P., Pereira, A. L. A., & Ferreira Júnior, A. J. D. (2013). Incidência de perfurações em luvas de látex estéreis utilizadas por estudantes nas clínicas de periodontia e cirurgia bucal. Odontologia Clínico-Científica (Online), 12(4), 255-259.

Sayın, S., Yılmaz, E., & Baydur, H. (2019). Rate of glove perforation in open abdominal surgery and the associated risk factors. Surgical infections, 20(4), 286-291.

Tlili, M. A., Belgacem, A., Sridi, H., Akouri, M., Aouicha, W., Soussi, S., Dabbebi, F., & Dhiab, M. B. (2018). Evaluation of surgical glove integrity and factors associated with glove defect. American journal of infection control, 46(1), 30-33.

Xavier, R. L. F., Vasconcelos, B. C. E., Silva, L. C. F., & Porto, G. G. (2006). Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (Internet), 11(5), 433-436.

Downloads

Published

19/05/2021

How to Cite

BARBOSA, L. M.; PEIXOTO, S. S. .; MONTEIRO, J. L. G. C.; CARNEIRO, C. D. A.; OLIVEIRA, L. M. L. de; RAMOS, A. C.; ARAÚJO, G. M.; BESSA NOGUEIRA, R. V. .; LAUREANO FILHO, J. R.; VASCONCELOS, B. C. do E. Surgical glove perforation during oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: An experimental study. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. e2610615290, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15290. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15290. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences