Pecan tree in agroforestry system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15637

Keywords:

Cultivars; Vegetative development; Dichogamy; Protandry; Protogeny.

Abstract

The biodiverse agroforestry systems are a soil management strategy that seeks to promote beneficial interactions between biotic and abiotic components. Pecan is a long-lived and large-sized tree species that will decisively influence the systems it integrates. The objective of this work is to establish patterns of behavior of pecan cultivars within the agroforestry system. The experiment was carried out between 2015 and 2017, the cultivar was the factor of variation evaluated, considering four treatments: ‘Barton’, ‘Cape Fear’, ‘Desirable’ and ‘Shawnee’. The variables analyzed were: plant height and diameter; number of buds per branch; number of branches; branch diameter and length; number of leaves per branch and number of branches at the end of the cycle; leaf area; number of leaflets, fresh and dry weight; number of racemes and flowers; inflorescences and ant attack and. Regarding reproductive behavior , the cultivar Barton showed protandric type dicogamy, 'Cape Fear' oscillated the behavior, showing itself to be protogynic in the first harvest and protandrous in the following. ‘Barton’ and ‘Cape Fear’ demonstrated  better reproductive performance than ‘Desirable’ and ‘Shawnee’ in agroforestry systems, however, studies that include the reproductive phase and consider other cultivars are required.

References

Andales, A., Wang, J., Sammis, T. W., Mexal, J. G., Simmons, L. J., Miller, D. R. & Gutschick, V. (2006). A modelo of pecan tree growth for the management of pruning and irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 84 (1-2), 77-88.

https://www.academia.edu/10413237/A_model_of_pecan_tree_growth_for_the_management_of_pruning_and_irrigation

Arreola-Avila, J. G., Murrieta, A. L. & Rosa, A. B. DE LA. (2010) . Inducción de crecimiento lateral em nogal pecanero (Carya illinoensis K. Koch) mediante despuente de brotes em primavera. Revista Chapingo, 16 (1), 31-36.

http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rcsh/v16n1/v16n1a5.pdf

Boscardin, J., Costa, E. C., Paulus, E., Machado, D. DO N., Pedron, L. & Silva, P. G. DA. (2017). Crescimento de nogueira-pecã sob diferentes preparos do solo e coveamentos: coleópteros como bioindicadores. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, 37 (92), 587-596.

https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/1496/614

Carvalho, R., Goedert, W. J. & Armando, M. S. (2004). Atributos físicos da qualidade do solo sob sistema agroflorestal. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 39 (11), 1153-1155.

https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v39n11/22589.pdf

Dulley, R. D. (2003). Agricultura Orgânica, Biodinâmica, Natural, Agroecológica ou Ecológica. Informações Econômicas Agrícola, 33 (10), 96-99.

http://www.iea.sp.gov.br/OUT/publicacoes/pdf/seto3-1003.pdf

Ewert, M., Venturieri, G. A., Steenbock, W. & Seoane, C. E. S. (2016). Sistemas agroflorestais multiestrata e a legislação ambiental brasileira: desafios e soluções. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 36, 95-114.

file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/39944-177254-1-PB.pdf

Fronza, D., Poletto, T. & Hamann, J. J. (2013). O cultivo da nogueira-pecã. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Colégio Politécnico, Núcleo de Fruticultura Irrigada.

Fronza, D., Hamann, J. J., Both, V., Anese, R. de O. & Meyer, E. A. (2018). Pecan cultivation: general aspects. Ciência Rural, 48 (2), 1-9.

https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000200201

Machado Filho, G. C. & Silva, F. R. da. (2012) . Benefícios sociais, econômicos e ambientais dos sistemas agroflorestais (SAFs) em pequenas propriedades rurais. Inclusão Social, 6 (1), 219-225.

file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/1704-Texto%20do%20artigo-2408-1-10-20160328.pdf

Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An introduction to agroforestry. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers e ICRAF, 51, 246-248.

http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/Units/Library/Books/PDFs/32_An_introduction_to_agroforestry.pdf?n=161

Reid, W. & Hunt, K. L. (2000). Pecan Production in the Northerm United States. HortTechnology, 10 (2), 298 – 301.

https://journals.ashs.org/horttech/view/journals/horttech/10/2/article-p298.xml

Reyes, M. R., Lavín A. A. (2014). Frutales de Nuez, Cinco alternativas no tradicionales para el secano interior del Maule. In: Reyes M. R.; Lavín A. A. Pecano (Carya illinoensis Koch.). Chillán. Boletín Inia 301. 138p.

file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/NR40190.pdf

Righi, C. A. & Bernardes, M. S. (2015). Cadernos da Disciplina Sistemas Agroflorestais. <https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/37740302/Cadernos_Disciplina_SAFs_2013_Montagem.pdf?responsecontentdispotion=inline%3B%20filename%3DCaderno_da_Sistemas_Agroflore.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-AmzCredential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20191127%2Fus-east-1%Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20191127T113645Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=0c694baf1384dd19b3a8ee155d52aad0ddf3357944c73c1e1b92056fc3410e99#page=7. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2019.

Santos, H. G. Dos., Jacomine, P. K. T., Anjos, L. H. C. Dos, Oliveira, V. A. De., Lumbreras, J. F., Coelho, M. R., Almeida, J. A. De., Araujo Filho, J. C. De., Oliveira, J. B. De & Cunha, T. J. F. (2018). Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. Embrapa, Rio de Janeiro, 5ª Ed., p.356.

https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1094003

Smith, M. W., Taylor, G. G., Karner, K. & Couvillon, G. A. (1989). Evaluation of Pecan/Peach Interplanting Systems. Scientia Horticulturae, 40(2), 133-137.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304423889900952

Smith, M.W., Wolf, M. E.; Cheary, B. S. & Carroll, B. L. (2001). Allelopathy of Bermudagrass, Tall Fescue, Redroot Pigweed, and Cutleaf Evening Primrose on Pecan. HortScience, 36 (6), 1047-1048.

file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/Allelopathy_of_Bermudagrass_Tall_Fescue_Redroot_Pi.pdf

Vasconcelos, M. A. M., Pedroso, A. J . S., Resque, A. G. L., Birani, S. M. & Kato, O. R. (2015). Crédito e renda como fator de influência no uso da terra na região nordeste do estado do Pará. Cadernos de Agroecologia, 10 (3).

Wells, M. L. (2011). Response of Pecan Orchard Soil Chemical and Biological Quality Indicators to Poultry Litter Application and Clover Cover Crops. HortScience, 46 (2), 306-310.

file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/[23279834%20-%20HortScience]%20Response%20of%20Pecan%20Orchard%20Soil%20Chemical%20and%20Biological%20Quality%20Indicators%20to%20Poultry%20Litter%20Application%20and%20Clover%20Cover%20Crops.pdf

Worley, R. E., Dove, S. K., Mullinix JR, B. G. & Smith, M. (1992). Long-term dichogamy of 80 pecan cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 49, 93-101.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304423892901464

Published

04/06/2021

How to Cite

BILHARVA , M. G. .; SOUZA , R. S. de .; DE MARCO, R. .; LÚCIO , P. da S. .; MARTINS, C. R. .; CARDOSO, J. H. .; MALGARIM, M. B. . Pecan tree in agroforestry system. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. e39710615637, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15637. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15637. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2021.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences