Sociological contributions to sustainable rural development: An integrative review of the literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.15969Keywords:
Public policies; Rural sustainable development; Sociology.Abstract
This research, by means of integrative revision, has as its objective to analyze the Brazilian scientific production which debates the understanding of Sustainable Development’s logics supported by sociology studies and research and to verify whether the rural scope is contemplated within those studies. Thorough research was conducted in Web of Science’s base and thus 19 papers were selected. Year of publication, language, source and type of document, research area and key words are analyzed. Two large themes were identified in the recovered papers, those being: Public Policies associated with Rural Sustainable Development and Management Practices associated with sustainable rural development making evident how studies in sociology comprehend this theme. In Brazil, the Amazon region has emphasis in the recovered studies, directed at projects and public policies directed at sustainable development. The interest in studies in this region of Brazil only reinforces its importance to the country’s sustainability.
References
Abramovay, R. (2000). Funções e medidas da ruralidade no desenvolvimento contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro. IPEA. n. 702, Rio de Janeiro, IPEA.
Aleixo, B., Pena, J. L., Heller, l. & Rezende, S. (2019). Infrastructure is a necessary but insufficient condition to eliminate inequalities in access to water: Research of a rural community intervention in northeast Brazil. Science of the Total Environment, 652: 1445-1455.
Anaya, F.C. (2014). Vazanteiros em movimento": O processo de ambientalização de suas lutas territoriais no contexto das políticas de modernização ecológica. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 19:10, 4041-4050.
Anzilago, M., Panhoca, L., Bezerra, C. A. P., Beuren, I. M. & Kassai, J. R. (2018). Values or hypocrisy: the global reporting initiative mapping in agricultural cooperatives in Parana, Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190: 487-497.
Arshad, M., Abbas, M. & Iqbal, M. (2019). Ethanol production from molasses: Environmental and socioeconomic prospects in Pakistan: Feasibility and economic analysis. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 14: 1-10.
Boff, L. (2015). Sustentabilidade: o que é e o que não é. 4ª edição, Petrópolis, Vozes.
Carmenta, R., Blackburn, G. A.; Davies, G.; Sassi C. ; Lima, A.; Parry, L., Tych, W. & Barlow, J. (2016). Does the Establishment of Sustainable Use Reserves Affect Fire Management in the Humid Tropics? Plos One, 11, 2: 1-19.
Chiaravalloti, R. M. (2019). The Displacement of Insufficiently 'Traditional' Communities: Local Fisheries in the Pantanal. Conservation & Society, 17:2 173-183.
Fearnside, P. (2009). Challenges for sustainable development in Brazilian Amazonia. Susteinable Development, 26: 141-149.
Freitas, C. M. De, Carvalho, M. L. De;, Ximenes, E. F., Arraes, E. F. & Gomes, J. O. (2012). Vulnerabilidade socioambiental, redução de riscos de desastres e construção da resiliência – lições do terremoto no Haiti e das chuvas fortes na região serrana, Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17:6, 1577-1586.
Garretti, R. D., Koh, I., Lambin, E. F., Kastens, J. H. & Brown, J. C. (2018). Intensification in agriculture-forest frontiers: land use responses to development and conservation policies in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 53: 233-243
Godoi, T. G., Búrigo, F. L. & Cazella, A. A. (2016). A sustentabilidade dos financiamentos do PRONAF para a agricultura familiar. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 38: 637- 661.
Kamalia, F. P., Borgesb, J. A. R., Osseweijera, P. & Posada, J. A. (2018). Towards social sustainability: Screening potential social and governance issues for biojet fuel supply chains in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 50-61.
Martins, S. R. (2001). Agricultura, ambiente e sustentabilidade: seus limites para a América Latina. CD-ROM/EMATER.
Medina, G., Pereira, A. (2017). Curbing enthusiasm for Brazilian agribusiness: The use of actor-specific assessments to transform sustainable development on theground. Applied Geography, 85: 101-112.
Mendes, K. D. S., Silveira, R. C. de C. P &Galvão, C. M. (2008). Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Enfermagem, 17, 4: 23-19.
Ribeiro, B. E. (2013). Beyond commonplace biofuels: Social aspects of ethanol. Energy Policy, 57: 355-162.
Sachs, I. (1995). Novas estratégias de desenvolvimento. Estudos avançados, 9, 25 : 84-97. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40141995000300004 consultado em 16/02/2020.
Sachs, I. (2008). Desenvolvimento includente, sustentável e sustentado. Rio de Janeiro, Garamond.
Schneider, S. (2010). Situando o desenvolvimento rural no Brasil: o contexto e
as questões em debate. Economia Política, 30: 3, 45-55.
Sieben, A. & Cleps Junior, J. (2012). Política energética na Amazônia: a UHE estreito e os camponeses tradicionais de Palmatuba/Babaçulândia (TO). Sociedade e Natureza, 24: 2,183-196.
Silva, V. C. S. & Vieira, I. C. G. (2016). Barômetro da Sustentabilidade aplicado a assentamentos rurais do leste do Estado do Pará, Brasil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 36: 201-221.
Stefanescu-Mihaila. R. O. (2016). Rural Economy and Bioethanol Production. Sustainability, 8: 2-19.
Szlafsztein, C. F. (2014). Development projects for small rural communities in the Brazilian Amazon region as potential strategies and practices of climate change adaptation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19: 2, 7-84.
Wolff, L. F., & Gomes, J. C. C. (2015). Beekeeping and Agroecological Systemsfor Endogenous Sustainable Development. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 39: 416–435.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ceyça Lia Palerosi Borges; Jonas Felipe Recalcatti; Marcia Hanzen; Nândri Cândida Strassburger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
