The CEREC system in the making of fixed partial prosthesis in ceramics: A clinical case report

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.16142

Keywords:

Restauration; Cad-cam; Ceramic.

Abstract

Indirect restorations are commonly manufactured in specialized prosthesis laboratories requiring more steps because these laboratories usually rely on a calibrated technician with experience and skill, in addition to receiving various jobs from different dentists. Like response to the dependence of dental surgeons on denture laboratories, the emergence of Computer-Aided Design (CAD / CAM) technology has been transforming the way indirect restorations are performed. CAD / CAM is an evolution of computer science and engineering to the needs of dentistry and has increased dramatically over the last decade thanks to the rapid development of digital computer technology by means of intraoral scanner and milling machine which can be run several systems such as CEREC. Thus, it is possible to optimize the consultations, presenting excellent aesthetic results and clinical longevity. With the CEREC system for dentists, the whole laboratory stage can be developed by the dentist himself inside the dental office. This article aims to present the CEREC system clarifying its intuitive handling through the clinical case report.

References

Akbar, J. H., Petrie, C. S., Walker, M. P., Williams, K., & Eick, J. D. (2006). Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry, 15(3), 155-163.

Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., & Edelhoff, D. (2008). Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. British dental journal, 204(9), 505-511.

Cassiano, C. K. P., Dias, S. C., Rigolin, F., de Oliveira Mussel, R. L., dos Santos, L. M., & Tiossi, R. (2021). Shear bond strength between resin cement and lithium disilicate ceramics after intrinsic staining. Research, Society and Development, 10(3).

Chain, M. C., Arcari, G. M., & Lopes, G. C. (2000). Restauraçöes cerâmicas estéticas e próteses livres de metal: as novas alternativas possibilitadas pelas novas porcelanas. RGO (Porto Alegre), 67-70.

Christensen, G. J. (2008). Successful use of in-office CAD/CAM in a typical practice. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 139(9), 1257-1260.

Dukic, W., Dukic, O. L., Milardovic, S., & Delija, B. (2010). Clinical evaluation of indirect composite restorations at baseline and 36 months after placement. Operative dentistry, 35(2), 156-164.

Duret, F., Blouin, J. L., & Duret, B. (1988). CAD-CAM in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 117(6), 715-720.

Fasbinder, D. J. (2010). The CEREC system: 25 years of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 141, 3S-4S.

Fasbinder, D. J., Neiva, G. F., Dennison, J. B., & Heys, D. R. (2013). Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM-Generated Composite Inlays After 10 Years. Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry, 28(4).

Hilgert, L. A., Calazans, A., & Baratieri, L. N. (2005). Restaurações CAD/CAM: o sistema CEREC 3. Clín. int. j. braz. dent, 198-209.

Keshvad, A., Hooshmand, T., Asefzadeh, F., Khalilinejad, F., Alihemmati, M., & Van Noort, R. (2011). Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite‐reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot‐pressed techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry, 20(7), 535-540.

Kim, J. H., Kim, K. B., Kim, S. H., Kim, W. C., Kim, H. Y., & Kim, J. H. (2015). Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system. Quintessence Int, 46(5), 401-7.

Kunzelmann, K. H., Jelen, B., Mehl, A., & Hickel, R. (2001). Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials. International journal of computerized dentistry, 4(3), 171-184.

Al-Hiyasat, A. S., Saunders, W. P., & Smith, G. M. (1999). Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 82(4), 476-481.

Liu, P. R., & Essig, M. E. (2008). Panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995), 29(8), 482-484.

Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., & Tamaki, Y. (2009). A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental materials journal, 28(1), 44-56.

Moörmann, W. H. (2006). The evolution of the CEREC system. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 137, 7S-13S.

Moörmann, W. H., & Bindl, A. (2000). The Cerec 3--A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: Initial clinical results. Quintessence international, 31(10).

Moreno, J. M. L., Oliveira, D. de, Sales, P. S. M., Marchiolli, C. L., Tenório, B. M., Barion, A. R., Toscano, R. A., Rocha, E. P., & Assunção, W. G. (2021). Os índices de trincas e fraturas em laminados cerâmicos são por razões oclusais? Uma revisão sistemática. Research, Society and Development, 10(5), e7810514620.

Nakamura, T., Dei, N., Kojima, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2003). Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 16(3).

Poticny, D. J., & Klim, J. (2010). CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. The journal of the American dental association, 141, 5S-9S.

Sirona the dental company. Empresa Sirona. [2013]. <http://www.sirona.com.br/br/empresa/about-sirona>.

Published

09/06/2021

How to Cite

AHID, B. de A. R. N.; ABREU-PEREIRA, C. A.; AHID, V. P. .; FERRO, A. C. .; PEREIRA, A. L. G. .; CASANOVAS, R. C. .; LIMA, D. M. .; AHID, F. J. M. The CEREC system in the making of fixed partial prosthesis in ceramics: A clinical case report. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. e54310616142, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i6.16142. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16142. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences