The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16713

Keywords:

Polymerization; Composite resins.; Dental curing lights

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the irradiance of different light-curing devices when subjected to the use of different types of biological protection barriers. The tested devices were: Bluephase N. Radii-Cal and VALO wireless. The biosafety barriers were: Polyethylene and Polyvinyl Chloride with one and two turns. The tips of the devices had their diameters measured on a digital pachymeter and the area of each tip was calculated. The power (mW) of the devices was measured with a potentiometer for 20 seconds and three times for each device. Then. the irradiance (mW / cm²) was calculated by the quotient of the power of the device by the cross-sectional area of the tip of the photoactivator. The irradiance data for each group were collected and subjected to two-way ANOVA analysis of variance (SPSS). with Tukey's post-hoc. As a result. a statistically significant interaction between the different types of light-curing device and translucent protection barriers (p < 0.05) were observed. It can be concluded that the protective barrier made with 1-turn polyvinyl chloride demonstrated the best irradiance results and among the light-curing devices. regardless of the type of barrier used. Bluephase obtained the best irradiance results. followed by Valo and Radii. 

Author Biographies

Caio Felipe de Almeida Nobre, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Materials Area

Mariana Itaborai Moreira Freitas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Department of Dental Clinic - Dental Prosthesis Area

May Anny Alves Fraga, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Department of Restorative Dentistry - Dental Materials Area

References

Ajaj. R. A.. Nassar. H. M., & Hasanain. F. A. Infection control barrier and curing time as factors affecting the irradiance of light-cure units. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 8(6). 523.

André. C. B., et al (2018). Stability of the light output. oral cavity tip accessibility in posterior region and emission spectrum of light-curing units. Operative dentistry. 43(4). 398-407.

Cadenaro. M., et al (2019). The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry. Dental Materials. 35(1). e1-e22.

De Oliveira, D. C. R. S., et al (2019). Effect of beam profiles from different light emission tip types of multiwave light-emitting diodes on the curing profile of resin-based composites. Operative dentistry. 44(4). 365-378.

Haenel, T., et al (2015). Effect of the irradiance distribution from light curing units on the local micro-hardness of the surface of dental resins. Dental Materials. 31(2).93-104.

Khode, R. T., et al (2017). Evaluation of effect of different disposable infection control barriers on light intensity of light-curing unit and microhardness of composite-An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry. 20(3).180.

McAndrew, R., et al (2011). The effect of disposable infection control barriers and physical damage on the power output of light curing units and light curing tips. British dental jornal. 210(8). E12-E12.

Mendoza, F. M. V., et al (2020). Photopolymerization devises light intensity relation with physical translucid barriers use. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 8(1). 180-187.

Mitton, B. A., & Wilson, N. H. F. (2001). The use and maintenance of visible light activating units in general practice. British Dental Journal. 191(2). 82-86.

Nassar, H. M., Almutairi, M., & Makhdom. A (2020). Irradiance of different curing modes of common light cure devices: An in vitro study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 10(2). 177.

Pollington. S, Kahakachchi. N., & van Noort. R (2009). The influence of plastic light cure sheaths on the hardness of resin composite. Operative dentistry. 34(6). 741-745.

Reis. A., & Loguercio. A. D (2007). Materiais dentários diretos: dos fundamentos à aplicação clínica. Santos. 277-278.

Rueggeberg, F. A., et al (2017). “Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review.” Braz. Oral Res. 31(1). 64–91.

Sabino-Silva, R., et al (2020). Coronavirus COVID-19 impacts to dentistry and potential salivary diagnosis. Clinical oral investigations. 24(4). 1619-1621.

Shimokawa, C. A. K., et al (2018). Effect of light curing units on the polymerization of bulk fill resin-based composites. Dental Materials. 34(8). 1211-1221.

Shortall, A. C., et al (2016). Guidelines for the selection. use. and maintenance of LED light-curing units-Part 1. British dental jornal. 221(8). 453-460.

Sinhoreti, M. A. C., et al (2018). Fotopolimerização de materiais restauradores resinosos: uma abordagem com base em evidências para a prática clínica. Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Research. 15(1). 44-53.

Soares, C. J., et al (2020). Effect of infection control barriers on the light output from a multi-peak light curing unit. Journal of dentistry. 103. 103503.

Soares, C. J., et al (2017). An evaluation of the light output from 22 contemporary light curing units. Brazilian dental jornal. 28(3). 362-371.

Verbeek, J. H., et al (2020). Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review. 4. 10.1002 / 14651858.CD011621.pub4

Published

02/07/2021

How to Cite

RÚBIO, G. R.; LOPES JÚNIOR, A. .; NOBRE, C. F. de A.; FREITAS, M. I. M. .; FRAGA, M. A. A.; FINCK, N. S. . The influence of translucent barriers on the effectiveness of dental light curing . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 7, p. e53910716713, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16713. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16713. Acesso em: 25 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences