Comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic odontometry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22411

Keywords:

Endodontics; Odontometry; Dental apex.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the ROOT ZX electronic apical locator using the radiographic dentistry method, with the aim of verifying whether there was a difference between electronic and radiographic dentometry in relation to the pulp condition: live pulp, dead pulp (with or without periapical injury). Were selected 38 root canals of the teeth of patients of both sexes, attended in the Dentistry course of the State University of Pernambuco. The comparison with the measurements obtained by the apical locator was performed, standardizing the dental coefficients considered correct, that is, at 1 mm from the apical foramen and with an acceptable margin of error of ± 0.5 mm. In the comparative evaluation of the real measurements of the root canals in relation to the apical locator, it was observed that the ROOT ZX presented a percentage of 94,73% of accuracy. Based on the service protocol used, it can be said that the use of the ROOT ZX locator is a highly reliable and accurate device in measuring the actual working length and can be safely used to obtain the actual length of the tooth.

References

Akisue, E., Gavini, G., & de Figueiredo, J. A. P. (2007). Influence of pulp vitality on length determination by using the Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 104(4), e129-e132.

Aydin, U., Karataslioglu, E., Aksoy, F., & Yildirim, C. (2015). In vitro evaluation of Root ZX and Raypex 6 in teeth with different apical diameters. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 18(1), 66.

Bahrololoomi, Z., Soleymani, A. A., Modaresi, J., Imanian, M., & Lotfian, M. (2015). Accuracy of an electronic apex locator for working length determination in primary anterior teeth. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 12(4), 243.

Baruah, Q., Sinha, N., Singh, B., Reddy, P. N., Baruah, K., & Augustine, V. (2018). Comparative evaluation of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in the presence of contemporary irrigants: An in vitro study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 8(4), 349.

Bernardes, R. A., Duarte, M. A., Vasconcelos, B. C., Moraes, I. G., Bernardineli, N., Garcia, R. B., ... & Bramante, C. M. (2007). Evaluation of precision of length determination with 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator, and RomiAPEX D-30. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 104(4), e91-e94.

Borges, M. M. B., Guimarães, B. M., Alves, J. D., Sena, G. N., Bernardes, R. A., & Duarte, M. A. H. (2016). Avaliação da precisão de dois localizadores foraminais na determinação do limite apical: estudo in vitro. Revista Odontológica do Brasil Central, 25(74).

Borin, A. C., Pereira, K. F. S., Verardo, L. B. J., Schweich, L. D. C., Arashiro, F. N., & Tomazinho, L. F. (2016). Distância ápice-forame e sua correlação com o método de odontometria radiográfica. Revista, 47(1).

Brunini, S. H. S., Lima, M. C. D., Schmidt, A. C., Santos, L. R. D., & Bonicontro, C. M. C. (2014). Comparação in vitro da eficiência de dois localizadores apicais eletrônicos. Dent. press endod, 15-20.

Carneiro, J. A., de Carvalho, F. M. A., Marques, A. A. F., Junior, E. C. S., Garcia, L. D. F. R., & Goncalves, L. C. O. (2016). Comparison of working length determination using apex locator and manual method-ex vivo study. Dentistry and Medical Research, 4(2), 39.

Ebrahim, A. K., Wadachi, R., & Suda, H. (2007). In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Australian Endodontic Journal, 33(1), 7-12.

Fernandes, V. C. S. (2014). Estudo clínico da acurácia da localização eletrônica na constrição apical e respectiva concordância radiográfica.

George, R. (2016). Precision of multi-frequency electronic apex locators. Evidence-based dentistry, 17(3), 86-87.

Gesi, A., Mareschi, P., Doldo, T., & Ferrari, M. (2014). Apical dimension of root canal clinically assessed with and without periapical lesions. International journal of dentistry, 2014.

Guimarães, B. M., Marciano, M. A., Amoroso-Silva, P. A., Alcalde, M. P., Bramante, C. M., & Duarte, M. A. H. (2014). O uso dos localizadores foraminais na endodontia: revisão de literatura. Revista Odontológica do Brasil Central, 23(64).

Heidemann, R., Vailati, F., Teixeira, C. S., Oliveira, C. A. P., & Junior, B. P. (2009). Análise comparativa ex vivo da eficiência na odontometria de três localizadores apicais eletrônicos: Root ZX, Bingo 1020 e Ipex. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia, 6(1), 7-12.

Hoer, D., & Attin, T. (2004). The accuracy of electronic working length determination. International endodontic journal, 37(2), 125-131.

Mancini, M., Felici, R., Conte, G., Costantini, M., & Cianconi, L. (2011). Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study. Journal of endodontics, 37(5), 684-687.

Mandlik, J., Shah, N., Pawar, K., Gupta, P., Singh, S., & Shaik, S. A. (2013). An in vivo evaluation of different methods of working length determination. The journal of contemporary dental practice, 14(4), 644.

Martins, J. N., Marques, D., Mata, A., & Caramês, J. (2014). Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: systematic review. Journal of endodontics, 40(6), 759-777.

Mohammadi, Z., Asgary, S., Shalavi, S., & Abbott, P. V. (2016). A clinical update on the different methods to decrease the occurrence of missed root canals. Iranian endodontic journal, 11(3), 208.

De Oliveira, V. A. M. Eficácia dos localizadores foraminais eletrônicos na endodontia.

Orosco, F. A., Bernardineli, N., Garcia, R. B., Bramante, C. M., Duarte, M. A. H., & Moraes, I. G. D. (2012). In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 20, 522-525.

Paiva, J. V. D. L. (2017). Uso dos localizadores foraminais na clínica integrada de odontologia (Bachelor's thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte).

Piasecki, L., Carneiro, E., da Silva Neto, U. X., Westphalen, V. P. D., Brandão, C. G., Gambarini, G., & Azim, A. A. (2016). The use of micro–computed tomography to determine the accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators and anatomic variations affecting their precision. Journal of endodontics, 42(8), 1263-1267.

Ravanshad, S., Adl, A., & Anvar, J. (2010). Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of endodontics, 36(11), 1753-1756.

Razavian, H., Mosleh, H., Khazaei, S., & Vali, A. (2014). Electronic apex locator: A comprehensive literature review—Part II: Effect of different clinical and technical conditions on electronic apex locator's accuracy. Dental Hypotheses, 5(4), 133.

Renner, D., Grazziotin-Soares, R., Gavini, G., & Barletta, F. B. (2012). Influence of pulp condition on the accuracy of an electronic foramen locator in posterior teeth: an in vivo study. Brazilian oral research, 26(2), 106-111.

Santos, C. I. D. (2017). Avaliação in vitro da eficiência de localizadores foraminais eletrônicos (Bachelor's thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte).

Tosun, G., Erdemir, A., Eldeniz, A. U., Sermet, U., & Sener, Y. (2008). Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study. International endodontic journal, 41(5), 436-441.

Tsesis, I., Blazer, T., Ben-Izhack, G., Taschieri, S., Del Fabbro, M., Corbella, S., & Rosen, E. (2015). The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of endodontics, 41(11), 1818-1823.

Vasconcelos, B. C. D., Bueno, M. D. M., Luna-Cruz, S. M., Duarte, M. A. H., & Fernandes, C. A. D. O. (2013). Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 21, 132-137.

Vieyra, J. P., & Acosta, J. (2011). Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators. International endodontic journal, 44(6), 510-518.

Downloads

Published

21/11/2021

How to Cite

TRAVASSOS, R. M. C. .; PRADO, V. F. F. do; OLIVEIRA, A. C. C. de .; SILVA , A. R. N. da .; BEZERRA, A. N. C. .; FONSECA, T. C. .; SILVA, D. H. das N. .; MOISÉS, L. de S. .; MELO JÚNIOR, P. M. . R. de . Comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic odontometry . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 15, p. e113101522411, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22411. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22411. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 15

Section

Health Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Rosana Maria Coelho Travassos; Victor Felipe Farias do Prado; Ana Caroline Chalegre de Oliveira; Ana Roberta Negromonte da Silva ; Amanda Nascimento Cavalcanti Bezerra; Tatianny Carneiro Fonseca; Douglas Hilderlandson das Neves Silva; Larianne de Sousa Moisés; Paulo Maurício Reis de Melo Júnior

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.