Nickel-titanium mechanized systems used in root canal preparation: a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22474Keywords:
Endodontics; Root canal filling; Dental instruments.Abstract
The present work aims to review the literature analyzing instruments in mechanized kinematics, emphasizing two reciprocating instrumentation systems (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold), and to identify their main characteristics and advantages compared to manual and rotary instrumentation. A bibliographic survey was carried out in the online databases of PubMed, SciELO, Lilacs, Science Direct, scientific articles of systematic review/meta-analysis, clinical cases, experimental studies in vitro/in vivo, and prospective and retrospective researches were included. With delimitation of specific period, from 2008 to 2021, within the proposed theme, which addressed the mechanized NiTi instruments, with an emphasis on the Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold systems. Following the inclusion criteria, the available abstracts were read and 22 articles that were part of this study were identified. Thus, it is concluded that there is no perfect system, each one has its advantages and disadvantages when compared to its competitors. Therefore, it is essential to understand how the system works, and master its use to obtain better results in endodontic therapy.
References
Adıgüzel, M., & Capar, I. D. (2017). Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold small, primary, and large instruments. Journal of endodontics, 43(4), 623-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.021
Alsilani, R., Jadu, F., Bogari, D. F., Jan, A. M., & Alhazzazi, T. Y. (2016). Single file reciprocating systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: Comparison of reciproc and WaveOne. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 6 (5), 402-409. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5109853/pdf/JISPCD-6-402.pdf
Aranguren, J., & Kuttler, S. (2015). WaveOne Gold, Surfea el conducto radicular con confianza. Soluciones Clínicas en Odontología, 3, 4-9. https://easydental.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Articulo_Wave_One_Gold.pdf
Bastos, M. M. B., Hanan, A. R. A., Bastos, A. M. B., Marques, A. A. F., Garcia, L. D. F. R., & Sponchiado, E. C. (2017). Topographic and Chemical Analysis of Reciprocating and Rotary Instruments Surface after Continuous Use. Brazilian dental journal, 28 (4), 461-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201701528
Bruschi, J., Boff, L. B., & Melo, T. A. F. D. (2017). Analysis of cutting capacity, preparation time, and apical deviation after instrumentation of artificial curved canals with the waveone® and reciproc® reciprocating systems. RGO-Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, 65, 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720170002000013216
Bueno, C. S. P., de Oliveira, D. P., Pelegrine, R. A., Fontana, C. E., Rocha, D. G. P., & da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2017). Fracture incidence of WaveOne and Reciproc files during root canal preparation of up to 3 posterior teeth: a prospective clinical study. Journal of endodontics, 43(5), 705-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.024
Campos, F. D. A. T., Silva, C. D. A. M., Aguiar, J. P., Vieira, A. P. D. S. B., Ferreira, J. M. C., & Ferreira, M. F. (2019). Sistemas rotatórios e reciprocantes na endodontia. Revista Campo do Saber, 4(5), 189-212. https://periodicos.iesp.edu.br/index.php/campodosaber/article/view/176/154
Capar, I. D., Ertas, H., Ok, E., Arslan, H., & Ertas, E. T. (2014). Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. Journal of Endodontics, 40 (6), 852-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010
D'Amario, M., De Angelis, F., Mancino, M., Frascaria, M., Capogreco, M., & D'Arcangelo, C. (2017). Canal shaping of different single-file systems in curved root canals. Journal of dental sciences, 12(4), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.001
De-Deus, G., Silva, E. J. N. L., Vieira, V. T. L., Belladonna, F. G., Elias, C. N., Plotino, G., & Grande, N. M. (2017). Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. Journal of endodontics, 43 (3), 462-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.039
El-Anwar, M. I., Yousief, S. A., Kataia, E. M., & El-Wahab, T. M. A. (2016). Finite Element Study on Continuous Rotating versus Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium Instruments. Brazilian dental journal, 27 (4), 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600480
Fangli, T., Maki, K., Kimura, S., Nishijo, M., Tokita, D., Ebihara, A., & Okiji, T. (2019). Assessment of mechanical properties of WaveOne Gold Primary reciprocating instruments. Dental materials journal, 38(3), 490-495. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-203
Ferreira, F. G., Barbosa, I. B., Scelza, P., Montagnana, M. B., Russano, D., Neff, J., & Scelza, M. Z. (2017). Noncontact three-dimensional evaluation of surface alterations and wear in NiTi endodontic instruments. Brazilian oral research, 31 (1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0074
Franco, V., Fabiani, C., Taschieri, S., Malentacca, A., Bortolin, M., & Del Fabbro, M. (2011). Investigation on the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion. Journal of endodontics, 37(10), 1398-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.030
Gavini, G., Santos, M. D., Caldeira, C. L., Machado, M. E. D. L., Freire, L. G., Iglecias, E. F., ... & Candeiro, G. T. D. M. (2018). Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Brazilian oral research, 32 (suppl 1), 44-65. https://www.scielo.br/j/bor/a/DDVdbgHDPwFkn5QQLWZVk7y/?lang=en&format=pdf
Grossi G. M., Cunha L. A., Lacerda M. F., Girelli C. F. M., & Xavier V. F. G. (2017). Comparação entre as limas Reciproc e WaveOne na formatação e centralização do canal: uma revisão integrativa. Revista da faculdade de Odontologia-UPF (Passo Fundo), 22 (2), 230-235. http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rfo/article/view/7058/4617
Gündoğar, M., & Özyürek, T. (2017). Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of endodontics, 43 (7), 1192-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.009
Hou, X. M., Yang, Y. J., & Qian, J. (2021). Phase transformation behaviors and mechanical properties of NiTi endodontic files after gold heat treatment and blue heat treatment. Journal of Oral Science, 63 (1), 8-13. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/josnusd/63/1/63_19-0331/_pdf/-char/ja
Hussien, S. W., & Al-Gharrawi, H. A. (2019). Incidence of Dentinal Root Defects Caused by RECIPROC Blue, ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT and RECIPROC Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments. The journal of contemporary dental practice, 20 (3), 291-297. https://europepmc.org/article/med/31204320
Jorgensen, B., Williamson, A., Chu, R., & Qian, F. (2017). The efficacy of the WaveOne reciprocating file system versus the ProTaper retreatment system in endodontic retreatment of two different obturating techniques. Journal of endodontics, 43 (6), 1011-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.018
Karataş, E., Ersoy, İ., Gündüz, H. A., Uygun, A. D., Kol, E., & Çakıcı, F. (2016). Influence of instruments used in root canal preparation on amount of apically extruded debris. Artificial organs, 40(8), 774-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12675
Keskin C., Inan U., Demiral M., & Keles A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments. (2017). Journal of Endodontics, 43 (8), 1360-1363. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0099239917303722
Keskin, C., & Sarıyılmaz, E. (2018). Apically extruded debris and irrigants during root canal filling material removal using Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, R-Endo and ProTaper Next systems. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 12(4), 272-276. https://dx.doi.org/10.15171%2Fjoddd.2018.042
Kim, H. C., Kwak, S. W., Cheung, G. S. P., Ko, D. H., Chung, S. M., & Lee, W. (2012). Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. Journal of endodontics, 38 (4), 541-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.014
Leonardo, R. D. T., Puente, C. G., Jaime, A., & Jent, C. (2013). Mechanized instrumentation of root canals oscillating systems. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 14 (1), 149-152. https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/74306/2-s2.0-84876826562.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Lima, L.C., Cornélio, A.L.G. (2020) Instrumentação com sistema reciprocante: revisão de Literatura. Revista Odontológica do Planalto Central, 18 (1), 1-18. https://dspace.uniceplac.edu.br/bitstream/123456789/482/1/Layssa%20Chaves%20Lima_0011592.pdf
Machado, M. E. D. L., Nabeshima, C. K., Leonardo, M. F. D. P., & Cardenas, J. E. V. (2012). Análise do tempo de trabalho da instrumentação recíproca com limaúnica: WaveOne e Reciproc. Revista da associação paulista de cirurgiões dentistas, 66(2), 120-125. http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/pdf/apcd/v66n2/a06v66n2.pdf
Madarati, A. A., & Habib, A. A. (2018). Modalities of using endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments and factors influencing their implementation in dental practice. BMC oral health, 18 (1), 1-10. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12903-018-0660-x.pdf
Magalhães, R. R. S. D., Braga, L. C. M., Pereira, É. S. J., Peixoto, I. F. D. C., Buono, V. T. L., & Bahia, M. G. D. A. (2016). The impact of clinical use on the torsional behavior of Reciproc and WaveOne instruments. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 24, 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150596
Maniglia-Ferreira, C., de Almeida Gomes, F., Ximenes, T., Neto, M. A. T., Arruda, T. E., Ribamar, G. G., & Herculano, L. F. G. (2017). Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. European journal of dentistry, 11(01), 041-047. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.4103/ejd.ejd_272_16.pdf
Miranda, C., Berger, C. R., & Farhat, D. S. (2020). Uso dos sistemas reciprocantes para o preparo dos canais radiculares: reciproc e reciproc blue. Revista Journal of Health, 21 (1), 64-75. http://www.cescage.com.br/revistas/index.php/JournalofHealth/article/view/933/404
Moreira, E. J. L., Antunes, H. D. S., Vieira, V. T. L., Cavalcante, D. M., Oliveira, H. E., Oliveira, D. D. S., ... & Silva, E. J. N. L. D. (2021). Effects of clinical use of NiTi reciprocating instruments on cyclic and torsional resistance, and on roughness. Brazilian Oral Research, 35 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0021
Nakatsukasa, T., Ebihara, A., Kimura, S., Maki, K., Nishijo, M., Tokita, D., & Okiji, T. (2021). Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties and shaping performance of heat-treated nickel titanium rotary instruments used in the single-length technique. Dental Materials Journal, 40 (3), 743-749. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/dmj/40/3/40_2020-255/_pdf/-char/ja
Nathani, T. I., Nathani, A. I., Banode, A. M., Khakiani, M. I., Fernandez, J. G. O., Terol, F. D. S., & Sans, F. A. (2018). Apical preparation size after repetitive pecking to the working length using different endodontic file systems. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, 32(2), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.003
Oliveira, D. J. F., Leoni, G. B., da Silva Goulart, R., de Sousa-Neto, M. D., Sousa, Y. T. C. S., & Silva, R. G. (2019). Changes in geometry and transportation of root canals with severe curvature prepared by different heat-treated nickel-titanium instruments: a micro–computed tomographic study. Journal of endodontics, 45(6), 768-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.018
Özyürek, T., Yılmaz, K., & Uslu, G. (2017). Shaping ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. Journal of Endodontics, 43(5), 805-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.010
Pereira, E. S. J., Peixoto, I. F. C., Viana, A. C. D., Oliveira, I. I., Gonzalez, B. M., Buono, V. T. L., & Bahia, M. G. A. (2012). Physical and mechanical properties of a thermomechanically treated NiTi wire used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. International endodontic journal, 45(5), 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01998.x
Plotino, G., Rubini, A. G., Grande, N. M., Testarelli, L., & Gambarini, G. (2014). Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Journal of Endodontics, 40(8), 1228-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.041
Prados-Privado, M., Rojo, R., Ivorra, C., & Prados-Frutos, J. C. (2019). Finite element analysis comparing WaveOne, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Reciproc Blue responses with bending and torsion tests. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 90 (1), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.016
Prichard, J. Rotation or reciprocation: a contemporary look at NiTi instruments. (2012) British Dental Journal, 212(7), 345–346. https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2012.268.pdf?origin=ppub
Ruddle, C. J. (2012). Endodontic canal preparation: WaveOne single-file technique. Dentistry Today, 31 (1), 124-126. https://static.theruddleshow.com/show-downloads/s2e01/WaveOne_Jan2012.pdf
Sadeghi, S. (2011). Shaping ability of NiTi rotary versus stainless steel hand instruments in simulated curved canals. Medicina Oral, Patologia, Oral Cirurgia Bucal, 16(3), e454-458. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e454
Santa-Rosa, C. C., Resende, P. D., da Cunha Peixoto, I. F., Buono, V. T. L., Viana, A. C. D., & de Azevedo Bahia, M. G. (2018). Evaluating the cutting efficiency of NiTi instruments with reciprocating motions. Arquivos em Odontologia, 54 (10), 1-8. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/arquivosemodontologia/article/view/3776/9770
Scelza, P., Harry, Davidowicz., Silva, L. E. D., Barbosa, I. B., & Scelza, M. Z. (2015). A comparison of two reciprocating instruments using bending stress and cyclic fatigue tests. Brazilian oral research, 29 (1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0107
Schäfer, E., & Bürklein, S. (2012). Impact of nickel–titanium instrumentation of the root canal on clinical outcomes: a focused review. Odontology, 100(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0066-1
Silva, E. J. N. L., Hecksher, F., Antunes, H. S., De-Deus, G., Elias, C. N., & Vieira, V. T. L. (2018). Torsional fatigue resistance of blue-treated reciprocating instruments. journal of endodontics, 44 (6), 1038-1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.005
Silva, E. J. N. L., Vieira, V. C. G., Tameirão, M. D. N., Belladonna, F. G., Neves, A. D. A., Souza, E. M., & De-Deus, G. (2016). Quantitative transportation assessment in curved canals prepared with an off-centered rectangular design system. Brazilian oral research, 30 (1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0043
Sousa-Neto, M. D., Crozeta, B. M., Lopes, F. C., Mazzi-Chaves, J. F., Pereira, R. D., Silva-Sousa, A. C., ... & Silva-Sousa, Y. T. C. (2020). A micro-CT evaluation of the performance of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in shaping ability of curved root canals. Brazilian oral research, 34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0039
Souza, J. P., de Oliveira, L. K. L., de Araújo, W. R., & Lopes, L. P. B. (2020). Instrumentação endodontica mecanizada e suas evoluções-Revisão de literatura. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6 (12), 96231-96240. https://www.brazilianjournals.com/index.php/BRJD/article/view/21278/16993
Topçuoğlu, H. S., & Topçuoğlu, G. (2017). Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an S-shaped canal. Journal of endodontics, 43(10), 1679-1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.009
Van der Vyver P. V. D. & Jonker C. Reciprocating instruments in Endodontics: a review of the literature: clinical review. (2014). South African Dental Journal, 69(9), 404-409. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC160578
Webber, J., Machtou, P., Pertot, W., Kuttler, S., Ruddle, C., & West, J. (2011). The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system. Roots, 1 (1), 28-33. http://moderndentistrymedia.com/jan_feb2012/webber.pdf
Yared, G. (2017). Reciproc blue: the new generation of reciprocation. Giornale italiano di endodonzia, 32 (2), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2017.09.003
Yared, G. Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. (2008). International Endodontic Journal, 41 (4), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x
Yared, G., & Alasmar Ramli, G. (2013). Single file reciprocation: A literature review. Endodontic Practice Today, 7(3), 171-178. http://www.healthmantra.com/rotary/recipro-review.pdf
Ye, J., & Gao, Y. (2012). Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. Journal of endodontics, 38(1), 105-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.028
You, S. Y., Kim, H. C., Bae, K. S., Baek, S. H., Kum, K. Y., & Lee, W. (2011). Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro–computed tomography. Journal of endodontics, 37 (9), 1296-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.021
Zupanc, J., Vahdat‐Pajouh, N., & Schäfer, E. (2018). New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys–a review. International endodontic journal, 51(10), 1088-1103. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iej.12924
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Gustavo Alves Oliveira; Luiz Roberto Mendes da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
