Autogenous biological restoration: clinical and social importance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23718

Keywords:

Permanent dental restoration ; Dentistry ; Dental public health; Dental esthetic.

Abstract

The Biological Restoration technique aims to use a dental fragment as the main restorative material for the reconstruction of a fractured tooth or with an extensive carious process, which may be autogenous or homogeneous. The objective of this study is to present, through a clinical case, an autogenous biological restoration with 2-year clinical and radiographic monitoring, as an alternative method of restoring teeth with destroyed clinical crown in a 27-year-old male patient. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (Number: 4.236.211). On clinical examination, it was found that tooth 16 had a temporary restoration in glass ionomer cement covering an extensive area involving the mesiopalatal cusp and the mesial crest. It was also noted that the patient had a healthy tooth 18 with no chewing function. Thus, it was proposed to make the autogenous biological restoration using tooth 18 extracted from the patient himself. Finally, after 2 years of follow-up, the restoration has good clinical applicability, showing the viability of the technique.

References

Albuquerque, N. L. G., Mendonça, J. S., Fonteles, C. S. R., Pereira, J. C., & Santiago, S. L. (2015). Biological restorations as an alternative to reconstructing posterior teeth: A case report. Oper Dent, 40:123-128.

Alcântara, C. E. P., Corrêa-Faria, P., Tavano, K. T. A., & Botelho, A. M. (2011). Fragment reattachment associated with pulpotomy in a posterior tooth with incomplete root formation. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 19(4):155-159.

Alcântara, C. E. P., Corrêa-Faria, P., Vasconcellos, W. A., & Ramos-Jorge, M. L. (2010). Combined technique with dentin post reinforcement and original fragment reattachment for the esthetic recovery of a fractured anterior tooth: a case report. Dent Traumatol, 26(5):447-450.

Baratieri, L. N., Ritter, A. V., Monteiro, J. S., & Mello Filho, J. C. (1998). Tooth fragment reattachment: an alternative for restoration of fractured anterior teeth. Pract Periodonts Aesthet Dent, 10:115-125.

Busato, A. L., Loguercio, A. D., Barbosa, A. N., Sanseverino, M. C., Macedo, R. P., & Baldissera, R. A. (1998). Biological restorations using tooth fragments. Am J Dent, 11:46-49.

Carvalho, G. A. O., Ribeiro, A. O. P., Câmara, J. V. F., & Pierote, J. J. A. (2020) Dental fragment bonding as a technique in oral rehabilitation: literature review. Research, Society and Development, 9(7): e667974567.

Chosak, A., & Eidelman, E. (1964). Rehabilitation of a fractured incisor using patient’s natural crown: a case report. J Dent Child, 31:19-21.

Corrêa-Faria, P., Alcântara, C. E., Caldas-Diniz, M. V., Botelho, A. M., & Tavano, K. T. (2010). “Biological restoration”: Root canal and coronal reconstruction. J Esthet Restor Dent, 22:168-177.

Grewal, N., & Seth, R. (2008). Comparative in vivo evaluation of restoring severely mutilated primary anterior teeth with biological post and crown preparation and reinforced composite restoration. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 26(4):141-148.

Hossain, M. S., Balakrishnan, V., Rahman, N. N., Sarker, M. Z., & Kadir, M. O. (2012). Treatment of clinical solid waste using a steam autoclave as a possible alternative technology to incineration. Int J Environ Res Public Health, (3):855-867.

Md, I., Singh, D. K., Nandlal, B., Kumar, P. P., & Singh, D. R. (2014). Biological restoration in pediatric dentistry: a brief insight. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 7(3):197-201.

Menezes-Silva, R., Botelho, L. P., Botelho, A. M., & Tavano, K. T. A. (2018). Biological restoration in permanent tooth: four-year follow-up. Braz Dent Sci, 21(1): 126-132.

Pegoraro, C. N., Domingues, L. A., & Trassi, P. M. M. M. (2006). Biological onlay: An alternative technique for restoration of severely damaged posterior tooth. A case report. Rev Dent Press Estét, 3:114-115.

Rao, D. G., Havale, R., Karobari, N. M., Latha, A. M., Nagaraj, M., Tharay, N., et al. (2020). Acceptance or rejection of biological restoration: An educational interventional study. J Family Med Prim Care, 9:1170-1176.

Reis, A., & Lourguercio, A. D. Tooth fragment reattachment current treatment concepst. (2004). Pract Period Aesthet Dent, 16:739-740.

Sanches, K., de Carvalho, F. K., Nelson-Filho, P., Assed, S., Silva, F. W., & Queiroz, A. M. (2007). Biological restorations as a treatment option for primary molars with extensive coronal destruction - Report of two cases. Braz Dent J, 18:248-252.

Santos, J. F. F., & Bianchi, J. (1991). Restoration of severely damaged teeth with resin bonding systems: case reports. Quintessence Int, 22(8):611-615.

Singh, P., Srivastava, N., Rana, V., Kaushik, N. (2020). Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 13(1): S55-S63.

Singhania, H., & Pandey, V. (2016). Biological restoration in dentistry- A review. Int J Res Health Allied Sci, 2:11-12.

Tavano, K. T. A., Botelho, A. M., Motta, T. P., & Paes, T. M. O. (2009). ‘Biological restoration’: total crown anterior. Dent Traumatol, 25(5):535-540.

Tavano, K. T. A., Botelho, A. M., Douglas-de-Oliveira, D. W., Avila, A. F., & Huebner, R. (2020) Resistance to fracture of intraradicular posts made of biological materials. BMC Oral Health, 3;20(1):300.

Wadhwani, K. K., Hasija, M., Meena, B., Wadhwa, D., & Yadav, R. (2013). Biological restorations: Option of reincarnation for severely mutilated teeth. European J Gen Dent, 2(1):62-66.

Downloads

Published

11/12/2021

How to Cite

GONÇALVES, M. W. A.; ALVES , V. P. .; BOTELHO, A. M. .; TAVANO, K. T. A. . Autogenous biological restoration: clinical and social importance. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 16, p. e213101623718, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23718. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23718. Acesso em: 24 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences