MPolSys Modeler, a tool for computational modeling of linear polymer systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.24007

Keywords:

MPolsys; Moltemplate; SAWLC; Polymer.

Abstract

The computational study of intermolecular relationships of a given material can be used as a route for predicting quantities impossible or difficult to be determined experimentally. Furthermore properties of new materials can also be predicted by techniques of this type, when they are still in the modeling phase. This technique reproduces the classical dynamic relationships between the constituent elements of the material, atoms or unicorpuscular approximations of molecules, from interaction potential models called force fields. This work aims to develop a tool that performs the composition of linear polymeric chain systems through a self-avoided walk. For this, the concept of self-experimentation of long walks (SAWLC) was used, together with the Python language to develop MpolSys Modeler. This tool is a non-overlapping polymer chain generator, which in turn generates outputs that can be used as input to Moltemplate. To validate the tool's results, experiments were carried out in which the numbers and polymerization chains of the simulated polymer were varied, observing the overlap or not of the molecules that make up the simulation. At the end of the simulations, there were positive results that indicate a promising usage of the tool for the creation of polymers with a high number of chains and degrees of polymerization.

References

Birta, L. G., & Arbez, G. (2013). Modelling and simulation. London: Springer.

Calio, P. B., Hocky, G. M., & Voth, G. A. (2020). Minimal Experimental Bias on the Hydrogen Bond Greatly Improves Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 16(9), 5675-5684.

Gartner III, T. E., & Jayaraman, A. (2019). Modeling and simulations of polymers: a roadmap. Macromolecules, 52(3), 755-786.

Gujrati, P. D., & Leonov, A. I. (Eds.). (2010). Modeling and simulation in polymers. John Wiley & Sons.

Guennebaud, G., & Jacob, B. (2010). Eigen. URl: http://eigen. tuxfamily. org, 3.

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., ... & Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357-362.

Hanwell, M. D., Curtis, D. E., Lonie, D. C., Vandermeersch, T., Zurek, E., & Hutchison, G. R. (2012). Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. Journal of cheminformatics, 4(1), 1-17.

Humbert, M. T., Zhang, Y., & Maginn, E. J. (2019). PyLAT: Python LAMMPS analysis tools. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 59(4), 1301-1305.

Jewett, A. I., Stelter, D., Lambert, J., Saladi, S. M., Roscioni, O. M., Ricci, M., ... & Goodsell, D. S. (2021). Moltemplate: A Tool for Coarse-Grained Modeling of Complex Biological Matter and Soft Condensed Matter Physics. Journal of molecular biology, 433(11), 166841.

Kondratyuk, N. D., & Pisarev, V. V. (2019). Calculation of viscosities of branched alkanes from 0.1 to 1000 MPa by molecular dynamics methods using COMPASS force field. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 498, 151-159.

Kratky, O., & Porod, G. (1949). Röntgenuntersuchung gelöster fadenmoleküle. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays‐Bas, 68(12), 1106-1122.

Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G., & Martínez, J. M. (2009). PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of computational chemistry, 30(13), 2157-2164.

Ovchinnikov, V., & Karplus, M. (2012). Analysis and elimination of a bias in targeted molecular dynamics simulations of conformational transitions: application to calmodulin. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 116(29), 8584-8603.

Plimpton, S., Kohlmeyer, A., Thompson, A., Moore, S., & Berger, R. (2020). Lammps stable release 29 October 2020. Zenodo. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo, 4157471.

Seabold, S., & Perktold, J. (2010, June). Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. In Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (Vol. 57, p. 61).

Stefko, M.l, Douglass, K., & Manley, S. (2020). PolymerCpp (0.1.3). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3928659

Tribello, G. A., Ceriotti, M., & Parrinello, M. (2012). Using sketch-map coordinates to analyze and bias molecular dynamics simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(14), 5196-5201.

Stukowski, A. (2009). Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 18(1), 015012.

Sun, H. (1998). COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102(38), 7338-7364.

Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. (2011). The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Computing in science & engineering, 13(2), 22-30.

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., & Van Mulbregt, P. (2020). SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature methods, 17(3), 261-272.

Downloads

Published

14/12/2021

How to Cite

FARIA, F. M. F. de .; LEÃO JUNIOR, R. G. . MPolSys Modeler, a tool for computational modeling of linear polymer systems. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 16, p. e359101624007, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.24007. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24007. Acesso em: 22 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Engineerings