Content validation and apparent check list adapted for surgical material count
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25113Keywords:
Checklist; Patient safety; Data validation.Abstract
Validate an adapted checklist for counting surgical material. This is a methodological study developed using face and content validation, and the integrative review was used as a search method that supported the adaptation of the proposed checklist and strengthened the relevance of the research for the safety of surgical patients. For this purpose, seven expert judges participated in the validation of the checklist instrument. And the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted as an agreement rate equal to or greater than 0.80. The results show that the instrument under analysis obtained a score of 0.95 in its overall assessment in relation to content validation, and the CVI found was 0.97 in relation to apparent validation, which reveals the approval of the instrument in relation to the content and appearance. Thus, the need for instruments and actions that promote the safety of patients and professionals related to the surgical environment is perceived, as patient safety is an essential dimension of the quality of health care. The correct use and understanding by professionals of this instruments important to solidify the centrality of patient care, providing more effective communication between professionals in the multidisciplinary teams, thus ensuring the practice of safe surgery.
References
Alexandre, N. M C. & Coluci, M. O. (2011). Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(7), 3061-3068.
Alpendre, F. T., Cruz, E. D. A., Dyniewicz, A. M., Mantovani, M. F., Silva, A. E. B. C. & Santos, G. S. (2017). Safe surgery: validation of pré and postoperative checklists. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 25, 1-9.
Brasil. (2017). Práticas seguras para prevenção de retenção não intencional de objetos após realização de procedimento cirúrgico em serviços de saúde. Brasília, DF: ANVISA.
Brasil. (2012). Resolução n 466 do CNS, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadores de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília, DF: Conselho Nacional de Saúde.
Criado, J. V. N., Dias, B. F. & Carmo, T. G. (2017). Processo de implementação do protocolo de cirurgia segura. Revista Cubana de Enfermería, 33 (1), 173-189.
Fehring, R. J. (1994) The Fehring model. In R. M. Carrol-Johnson & M. Paquete (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the tenth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Ferraz, E. M. (2009). A cirurgia segura: uma exigência do século XXI. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 36 (4), 281-282.
Ferreira, N. C. S., Ribeiro, L., Mendonça, E. T. & Amaro, M. O. F. (2019). Checklist de Cirurgia Segura: conhecimento e utilização do instrumento na perspectiva dos técnicos de enfermagem. Revista de Enfermagem do Centro-Oeste Mineiro, 16 (9), 1-8.
Freitas, M. R., Antunes, A. G., Azevedo, B. N. L., Fernandes, F. C., Monte, L. C. & Gama, Z. A. S. (2014). Avaliação da adesão ao checklist de cirurgia segura da OMS em cirurgias urológicas e ginecológicas, em dois hospitais de ensino de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Caderno de Saúde Pública, 30 (1), 137-148.
Pasquali, L. (1998). Princípios de elaboração de escalas psicológicas. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 25 (5), 206-213.
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2011). Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: avaliação de evidências para as práticas da enfermagem. Artmed.
Ribeiro, H. C. T. C., Quites, H. F. O., Bredes, A. C., Sousa, K. A. S. & Alves, M. (2017). Adesão ao preenchimento do checklist de segurança cirúrgica. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 33 (10), 1-13.
Sault Area Hospital. (2015). Surgical safety checklist compliance. https://sah.on.ca/patients/quality-safety/patient-safety-indicators/surgical-safety-checklist-compliance/
Sewell, M., Adebibe, M., Jayakumar, P., Jowett, C., Kong, K. & Vemulapalli, K. (2011). Use of WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. International Orthopaedics, 35 (6), 897-901.
Silva, C. S. O., Pinheiro, G. O., Freitas, B. C., Figueiredo, B. M., Macedo, W. T. P. & Silva, E. C. L. (2017). Checklist de cirurgia segura: os desafios da implantação e adesão nas instituições hospitalares brasileiras. Revista Espaço Ciência & Saúde, 5 (2), 72-86.
Silva Júnior, S. D. & Costa, F. J. (2014). Mensuração e escalas de verificação: uma análise comparativa das escalas de Likert e Phrase Completion. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisas de Marketing, Opinião e Mídia, 15 (3), 1-16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Cavalcante; Maria Salete Bessa Jorge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
