Analysis of the risks of using e-cigarettes in pregnancy: an integrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32797

Keywords:

Eletronic nicotine delivery systems; Vaping; Pregnant women; Review; Teaching.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the risks of using electronic cigarettes during pregnancy. For this, an integrative literature review was developed, in the PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus databases, as well as, in the searched AskMEDLINE, in July 2022, using the terms “Electronic cigarettes”, “Vaping” and “Pregnant women”, in the English, Portuguese and Spanish languages – adapting them according to each database. 452 studies were found, published between 2017 and 2021, and of these, five were selected to compose the sample, after applying the selection criteria and full reading of the studies. As a result, we found that the use of electronic cigarettes during pregnancy can lead to reduced breastfeeding, low birth weight newborns, lower than adequate head circumference, neuromotor alterations and higher rates of hospitalization in intensive care units, in addition to other complications. Thus, it is imperative that the habit of smoking these cigarettes be discouraged and that further investigations be conducted to expand clarification on the subject.

Author Biography

Breno de Oliveira Ferreira, Universidade Federal do Amazonas



References

Bowker, K., Lewis, S., Ussher, M., Naughton, F., Phillips, L., Coleman, T., Orton, S., McRobbie, H., Bauld, L. & Cooper, S. (2021). Smoking and vaping patterns during pregnancy and the postpartum: A longitudinal UK cohort survey. Addict Behav, 123:107050.

Cardenas, V.M, Cen, R., Clemens, M. M., Moody, H. L., Ekanem, U. S., Policherla, A., Fischbach, L. A., Eswaran, H., Magann, E. F., Delongchamp, R. R. & Boysen, G. (2019). Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) by pregnant women I: Risk of small-for-gestational-age birth. Tob Induc Dis, 17:44.

Clemens, M. M., Cardenas, V. M., Fischbach, L. A., Cen, R., Siegel, E. R., Eswaran, H., Ekanem, U.S., Policherla, A., Moody, H. L., Magann, E. F. & Boysen, G. (2019). Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems by pregnant women II: Hair biomarkers for exposures to nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamines. Tob Induc Dis., 17:50.

Cacchione, P. Z. (2016). The evolving methodology of scoping reviews. Clin Nurs Res; 25:115-9.

England, L. J., Kim, S. Y., Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., et al. (2012). Maternal smokeless tobacco use in Alaska Native women and singleton infant birth size. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 91:93–103.

Froggatt, S., Covey, J. & Reissland, N. (2020). Infant neurobehavioural consequences of prenatal cigarette exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr, 109(6):1112-1124.

Froggatt, S., Reissland, N., Covey, J. (2020). The effects of prenatal cigarette and e-cigarette exposure on infant neurobehaviour: A comparison to a control group. E Clinical Medicine, 28:100602.

Galvão, C. M. (2006). Níveis de evidência. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem; 19(2): 1-5.

Kapaya, M., D’Angelo, D. V., Tong, V. T., et al. (2019). Use of electronic vapor products before, during, and after pregnancy among women with a recent live birth – Oklahoma and Texas, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 68: 189–194.

Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., et al. (2007) Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 56:1–103.

McDonnell, B. P., Dicker, P. & Regan, C. L. (2020). Electronic cigarettes and obstetric outcomes: a prospective observational study. BJOG, 127(6):750-756.

Merklinger-Gruchala, A., Jasienska, G. & Kapiszewska, M. (2017). Parity Conditions the Risk for Low Birth Weight after Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution. Biodemography Soc Biol, 63(1):71-86.

Oncken, C., Ricci, K. A., Kuo, C. L., et al. (2017). Correlates of electronic cigarettes use before and during pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res, 19: 585–590.

Opondo, C., Harrison, S., Alderdice, F., Carson, C. & Quigley, M. A. (2021). Electronic cigarette use (vaping) and patterns of tobacco cigarette smoking in pregnancy-evidence from a population-based maternity survey in England. PLoS One, 16(6):e0252817.

Rollins, L. G., Sokol, N. A., McCallum, M., England, L., Matteson, K., Werner, E. & Stroud, L. R. (2020). Electronic cigarette use during preconception and/or pregnancy: prevalence, characteristics, and concurrent mental health conditions. Journal of Women’s Health. 29 (6): 780-788.

Stieb, D. M., Chen, L., Eshoul, M. & Judek, S. (2012). Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res, 117:100-11.

Suter, M. A., Anders, A.M. & Aagaard, K. M. (2013). Maternal smoking as a model for environmental epigenetic changes affecting birthweight and fetal programming. Mol Hum Reprod. 19:1–6.

Suter, M. A., Mastrobattista, J., Sachs, M. & Aagaard, K. (2015). Is there evidence for potential harm of electronic cigarette use in pregnancy? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 103(3): 186-195.

Taborda, J. A., Silva, F.C., Ulbricht, L. & Neves, E. B. (2014). Consequências da gravidez na adolescência para as meninas considerando-se as diferenças socioeconômicas entre elas. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva, 22(1):16-24.

Tong, V. T., Dietz, P. M., Morrow, B., et al. (2013). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy–pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, United States, 40 sites, 2000–2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 62:1–19

Published

27/07/2022

How to Cite

PEREIRA, C. E. P. .; LIRA NETO, J. C. G. .; FERREIRA, B. de O. Analysis of the risks of using e-cigarettes in pregnancy: an integrative review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 10, p. e185111032797, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32797. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32797. Acesso em: 4 oct. 2022.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences