Conceptions of undergraduate students about the teaching and learning processes in different lifecycles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17648/rsd-v7i7.355Keywords:
Training of teachers; Development periodization; Educational Psychology.Abstract
Educational Psychology has been present as an academic discipline in the various undergraduate courses. Considering the importance of this area for the training of teachers, this work aims to analyze the conceptions of UFRN’s undergraduate students about the teaching and learning processes on the infancy, adolescence, youth and adult life. Mixed methods were used, with data gathering through semi-structured questionnaires applied with a sample of 319 students, of which 152 did not attend components of Educational Psychology and 167 already attended. The data were analyzed through the Content Analysis method, subsidizing the construction of later categories, referring to the teaching and learning process, and life cycles. The results show that 44.1% of the students who did not attend and 33.5% of those who already attended components of Educational Psychology expressed conceptions of teaching and learning processes centered on the teacher; while 48.9% of those who did not attend and 48.5% of those who attended did express incoherent conceptions among themselves. Regarding the life cycles, 53.7% of the students who did not attend and 64.1% of those who attended did not differentiate the cycles; while 42.2% of students who did not attend and 34% of those who attended them differed based on stereotypes. In this way, this study contacts that it is necessary to reflect about the real contributions of the Educational Psychology and rethink its role both in the formation and in the teaching performance.
References
BZUNECCK, José Aloyseo. A psicologia educacional e a formação de professores: tendências contemporâneas. Psicologia escolar e educacional, v. 3, n. 1, 1999. p. 41-52.
CANDAU, Vera Maria. Construir ecossistemas educativos – reinventar a escola. In: CANDAU, Vera Maria (Org.). Reinventar a escola. 6ª ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2008.
CAVALCANTE, Ricardo Bezerra; CALIXTO, Pedro; PINHEIRO, Marta Macedo Kerr. Análise de conteúdo: considerações gerais, relações com a pergunta de pesquisa, possibilidades e limitações do método. Inf. & Soc.: Est, João Pessoa, v.24, n.1, p. 13-18, jan./abr. 2014.
CRESWELL, J. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Trad. Luciana de Oliveira da Rocha. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.
FONTANA, R. Psicologia e trabalho pedagógico. São Paulo: Atual, 1997.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à pratica educativa. 48ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2014.
GATTI, Bernardete Angelina. Formação de professor no Brasil: características e problemas. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 31, n. 113, p. 1355-1379, out./dez. 2010.
REGO, Teresa Cristina. Vygotsky: uma perspectiva histórico-cultural da educação. 22ª ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2011
SADALLA, A. M. A.; BACCHIEGGA, F.; PINA, T. A.; WISNIVESKY, M. Psicologia e licenciatura: crenças, dilemas e contribuições. Pró-Posições, Campinas, v. 16, n. 1, p. 241-257, jan./abr. 2005.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. A formação social da mente. 7. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.