Impacts of obstetric violence in Brazil: a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i2.39950Keywords:
Women's health; Maternal health; Humanized birth.Abstract
Obstetric violence (OV) is considered a global public health problem, and can be defined as any practice against women's sexual and reproductive health, and can also be considered an appropriation of the female body, characterized by dehumanized treatment, in which its main characterizations are: physical, psychological and sexual violence. OV is still little perceived and supported by the law, compared to other forms of violence against women, and discussions on the subject are relevant. Thus, the objective of this work is to discuss the effects of obstetric violence, seeking to give visibility, raise awareness and encourage the prevention of this violence that is part of the Brazilian reality. For this, the work was carried out through an exploratory descriptive bibliographical research, characterized by a review of references already analyzed and published. The following databases were used: Google Scholar, Scopus and Scielo, using the keywords: “obstetric violence”, “Brazil”, “childbirth”, “pregnancy”, “humanized childbirth”, “obstetric violation” and their combinations. Obstetric violence represents an impasse for the fulfillment of women's rights, as it is perceived as an increasingly common situation in their daily lives, whether in prenatal, delivery, postpartum or abortion situations. More robust, interdisciplinary and transnational research is needed to help policymakers, maternity care providers, women and families who access maternity services to better understand, define and address this phenomenon.
References
Abuya T., Ndwiga C., Ritter J., Kanya L., Bellows B., Binkin N., Warren, C. E. (2015). The effect of a multi-component intervention on disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 15(224), 1-14, 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0645-6.
Aguiar, J. M., d’Oliveira, A. F. P. L., Schraiber, L. B. (2013). Institutional violence, medical authority, and power relations in maternity hospitals from the perspective of health workers. Cad Saúde Pública. 29(11), 2287-96, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00074912.
Andrade, P. O. N., Silva, J. Q. P., Diniz, C. M. M., Caminha, M. F. C. (2016). Factors associated with obstetric abuse in vaginal birth care at a high-complexity maternity unit in Recife, Pernambuco. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant., 16(1):29-37, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042016000100004.
Bhattacharya, S., Sundari Ravindran, T. K. (2018). Silent voices: institutional disrespect and abuse during delivery among women of Varanasi district, northern India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18(1):338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1970-3
Biscegli, T. S., Grio, J. M., Melles, L. C., Ribeiro, S. R. M. I., Gonsaga, R. A. T. (2015). Obstetrical violence: profile assistance of a state of São Paulo interior maternity school. Cuid Arte Enferm., 9(1):18-25, 2015. http://fundacaopadrealbino.org.br/facfipa/ner/pdf/Revistacuidarteenfermagem%20v.%209%20n.1%20%20jan.%20jun%202015.pdf.
Bittencourt, S. D. A., Cunha, E. M., Domingues, R. M. S. M., Dias, B. A. S., Dias, M. A. B., Torres, J. A., Leal, M. C. (2020). Born in Brazil: continuity of care during pregnancy and postpartum period for women and newborns. Rev Saúde Pública, 54:100, 1-11, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002021
Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., Moller, A., Say, L., Hosseinpoor, A. R., Yi, M., Rabello Neto, D. L., Temmerman, M. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections, Lancet, 392, 1341–1348, 2018. https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2818%2931928-7
Bohren, M. A., Mehrtash, H., Fawole, B., Maung, T. M., Balde, M. D., Maya, E., Thwin, S. S., Aderoba, A. K., Tunçalp, Ö. (2019). How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries:a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet, 394(10210):1750-63, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0
Bohren, M. A., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., Aguiar, C., Saraiva Coneglian, F,, Gülmezoglu, A, M. (2015). The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6): e1001847, 2015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
Bohren, M., Hunter, E. C., Munther-Kaas, H. M., Souza, J.P., Vogel, J. P., Gulmezoglu, A. M. (2014). Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Reprod Health, 11(71), 1-17, 2014. https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-11-71.
Bourdreux J. (2019). Naming‘Obstetric Violence’: Coercion, Bullying, and Intimidation in Non-Evidence Based Childbirth Interventions. The Journal of Motherhood Studies, 15(1):1–4, 2019. https://jourms.org/naming-obstetric-violence-coercion-bullying-and-intimidation-in-non-evidence-based-childbirth-interventions/
Bourguignon, A. M., Grisotti, M. (2018). Conceptions on childbirth humanization in Brazilian theses and dissertations. Saúde e Soc., 27:1230–45, 2018. https://doi-org.ez9.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1590/S0104-12902018170489.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (BR). (2011). Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria nº 1.459, de 24 de junho de 2011. Institui, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde-SUS - a Rede Cegonha. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt1459_24_06_2011.html
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (BR). (2012). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Brazil. Atenção ao pré-natal de baixo risco. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cadernos_atencao_basica_32_prenatal.pdf
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2012). Resultados preliminares da pesquisa de satisfação com mulheres puérperas atendidas no Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, maio a outubro de 2012. Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa, Departamento de Ouvidoria Geral do SUS. Brasília, DF. https://saudenacomunidade.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/relatorio_pre_semestral_rede_cegonha_ouvidoria-sus_que-deu-a-notc3adcia-de-64-por-cento-sem-acompanhantes.pdf
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2019). Tipo de parto segundo região/ano. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2000). Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria nº 570, de 1ºde junho de 2000. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2000. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2000/prt0570_01_06_2000_rep.html
Carmo Leal, C., Pereira, A. P. E., Domingues, R. M. S. M., Theme Filha, M. M., Dias, M. A. B., Pereira, M. N., Bastos, M. H., Gama, S. G. N. (2014). Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women. Cad. Saude Publica, 30 (1), pp. S1-S16, 2014. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00151513
Carvalho, I. D. S., Brito, R. S. (2017). Formas de violência obstétrica vivenciadas por puérperas que tiveram parto normal. Enfermería Global, 16(3):71, 2017. DOI: 10.6018/eglobal.16.3.250481.
Castrillo, B. (2016). Tell me by whom is defined and i’ll tell if it is violent: a reflection on obstetric violence. Sex Salud Soc., 24, 43-68, 2016. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/sess/n24/1984-6487-sess-24-00043.pdf
Chai, C. G., Santos, J. P., Chaves, D. G. (2018). Institutional violence against women: the judiciary power, from pretenso protector to agressor effective. Rev Eletrôn Direito UFSM, 13(2), 640-65, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369429538
Cotlear, D., Gómez-Dantés, O., Knaul, F., Atun, R., Barreto, I. C., Cetrángolo, O., Cueto, M., Francke, P., Frenz, P., Guerrero, R., Lozano, R., Marten, R., Sáenz, R. (2015). Overcoming social segregation in health care in Latin America. Lancet, v. 28;385(9974):1248-59. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61647-0.
D'aquino, L. S. (2016). O movimento de humanização do parto como movimento social e suas semelhanças com os recentes protestos que tomaram o mundo. Revista Direitos Sociais e Políticas Públicas, 4(1), 155-172, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25245/rdspp.v4i1.119
Diaz-Tello F. (2016). Invisible wounds: obstetric violence in the United States. Reprod Health Matters, 24(47), 56-64, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.004
Diniz S. G., Salgado, H. O., Andrezzo, H. F. A., Carvalho, P. G. C., Carvalho, P. C. A., Aguiar, C. A., Niy, D. Y. (2015). Abuse and disrespect in childbirth care as a public health issue in Brazil: origins, definitions, impacts on maternal health, and proposals for its prevention. J Hum Growth Dev., 25(3), 377-384, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.106080
Dixon, L. Z. (2015). Obstetrics in a time of violence: Mexican midwives critique routine hospital practices. Med Anthropol Q., 29(4), 437-54, 2015. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maq.12174/pd
Fabbro, M. R. C., Wernet, M., Baraldi, N. G., Bussadori, J. C. C., Salim, N. R., Souto, B. G. A., Fermiano, A. R. (2022). Antenatal care as a risk factor for caesarean section: a case study in Brazil. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 731, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05008-z
Faneite, J., Feo, A., Toro, J. (2012). Grado de conocimiento de violencia obstétrica por el personal de salud. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela, 72(1), 4-12, 2012. http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0048-77322012000100002&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Genovesi FG, Canario MASS, Godoy CB, Maciel SM, Cardelli AAM, Ferrari RAP. (2020). Maternal and child health care: adequacy index in public health services. Rev Bras Enferm., 73: e20170757, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0757
Gerhardt, T. E., Silveira, D. T. (2009). Métodos de Pesquisa. Plageder: UFRGS; 2009;1–31. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/52806
Gonçalves, M.F., Teixeira, E.M.B., Silva, MAS, Corsi, N.M., Ferrari, R.A.P., Pelloso, S.M., Cardelli, A. A. M. (2017). Prenatal care: preparation for childbirth in primary healthcare in the south of Brazil. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017;38:e2016–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.03.2016-0063
Grilo Diniz, C.S., Rattner, D., A., d'Oliveira, A. F. P. L., Aguiar, J. M., Niy, D.Y. (2018). Disrespect and abuse in childbirth in Brazil: social activism, public policies and providers' training. Reprod Health Matters, 26 (53) (2018), pp. 19-35, 10.1080/09688080.2018.1502019
Henriques, T. (2021). Violência obstétrica: um desafio para saúde pública no Brasil. Páginagrená, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, 2021. https://www.ims.uerj.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/violencia-obstetrica_tatiana_henriques_pagina_grena_fev2021.pdf
Kruk, M. E., Kujawski, S., Mbaruku, G., Ramsey, K., Moyo, W., Freedman, L. P. (2018). Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(1):e26–33.
Lansky, S., Souza, K. V., Peixoto, E. R. M., Oliveira, B. J., Diniz, C. S. G., Vieira, N. F., Cunha, R. O., Friche, A. A. L. (2019). Violência obstétrica: influência da Exposição Sentidos do Nascer na vivência das gestantes. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, 24(8), 2811-2823, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018248.30102017.
Leal, M. C., Szwarcwald, C. L., Almeida, P. V. B., Aquino, E. M. L., Barreto, M. L., Barros, F., Victora, C. (2018). Reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health in the 30 years since the creation of the Unified Health System (SUS). Ciên Saude Colet. 2018; 23: 1915–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018236.03942018
Leal, M. C., Pereira, A. P. E., Domingues, R. M. S. M., Theme Filha, M. M., Dias, M. A. B., Nakamura-Pereira, M., Bastos, M. H., Gama, S. G. N. (2014). Intervenções obstétricas durante o trabalho de parto e parto em mulheres brasileiras de risco habitual. Cad. Saúde Pública, 30(1), 17-32, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00151513
Leal, M., Bittencourt, S. A., Esteves-Pereira, A. P., Ayres, B., Silva, L., Thomaz, E., Lamy, Z. C., Nakamura-Pereira, M., Torres, J. A., Gama, S., Domingues, R., Vilela, M. (2019). Progress in childbirth care in Brazil: preliminary results of two evaluation studies. Cad. Saude Publica, 35 (7), e00223018, 2019. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00223018
Lewin, A. P. O. C. M., Prata, A. R. S., Leite, D. S., Souza, P. S. M., Teixeira, T. D. S. (2019, 14, 11). Violência Obstétrica: Um Desafio para a Defensoria Pública na Promoção dos Direitos Humanos das Mulheres. [Anais]. Congresso Nacional de Defensores Públicos (CONADEP), 2019. https://www.anadep.org.br/wtk/pagina/materia?id=42547
Mariani, A. C., Nascimento-Neto, J. (2016). Violência obstétrica como violência de gênero e violência institucionalizada: breves considerações a partir dos direitos humanos e do respeito às mulheres. Cad Esc Direito, 2(25), 48-60, 2016. https://portaldeperiodicos.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/cadernosdireito/article/view/3060/2630
Marrero, L., Brüggemann, O. M. (2018). Violência institucional durante o processo de parturição no Brasil: revisão integrativa. Rev Bras Enferm, 71(3), 1152-61, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167 2017-0238
Martinelli, K. G., Santos Neto, E. T., Gama, S. G. N., Oliveira, A. E. (2014). Adequacy process of prenatal care according to the criteria of Humanizing of Prenatal care and Childbirth Program and Stork Network. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet., 36:56–64, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032014000200003.
Mena-Tudela, D., Iglesias-Casás, S., González-Chordá, V. M., Cervera-Gasch, Á., Andreu-Pejó, L., Valero-Chilleron, M. J. (2020). Obstetric violence in Spain (part I): Women’s perception and Interterritorial differences. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(21):7726, 2020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217726.
Monteiro, L. (2016, out., 28). OMS registra 7 tipos de violência sofridos no parto. Bebe.com.br, https://bebe.abril.com.br/familia/oms-registra-7-tipos-de-violencia-sofridos-no-parto/#:~:text=Foram%20elencados%2C%20no%20total%2C%20sete,de%20sa%C3%BAde%20de%20boa%20qualidade
Nogueira, N. V. (2021). O reconhecimento da violência obstétrica no brasil e sua repercussão sociolegislativa por intermédio do movimento feminista. Insurgência: revista de direitos e movimentos sociais, 7(2), 261-286, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/insurgncia.v8i2.38447
Oliveira, D. (2019, mar., 14). Violência obstétrica. Revista Jus Navigandi. [S.l], 2019. https://jus.com.br/artigos/72671/violencia-obstetrica.
Oliveira, T. R., Costa, R. E. O. L., Monte, N. L., Veras, J. M. M. F., Sá, M. I. M. R. (2017). Women’s perception on obstetric violence. Rev Enferm UFPE, 11(1), 40-6, 2017. http://www.revista.ufpe.br/revistaenfermagem/index.php/revista/article/view/10539/pdf_2097
Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). (2014). Prevenção e eliminação de abusos, desrespeito e maus-tratos durante o parto em instituições de saúde. Genebra: OMS, 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/3/WHO_RHR_14.23_por.pdf
Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). (2018). Cuidados intraparto da OMS para uma experiência positiva de parto. Genebra: OMS, 2018. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/
Paiz, J.C., Ziegelmann, P.K., Martins, A.C.M., Giugliani, E.R.J., Giugliani, C. (2021). Factors associated with the women’s satisfaction with prenatal care in Porto Alegre-RS. Ciên Saúde Colet., 26:3041–51, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021268.15302020.
Pereira, C., Toro, J., Domínguez, A. (2015). Violência obstétrica desde la perspectiva de la paciente. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venezuela, 75(2), 81-90, 2015. http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0048-77322015000200002
Pickles, C. (2015). Eliminating abusive ‘care’: A criminal law response to obstetric violence in South Africa. SA Crime Quart, 54, 5-16, 2015. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sacq/article/view/127746
Reuther, M L. (2021). “Prevalence of Obstetric Violence in Europe: Exploring Associations with trust, and care-Seeking Intention.” Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente, 2021. https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/87962
Rodrigues, F. A., Lira, S. V. G., Magalhães, P. H., Freitas, A. L. V., Mitros, V. M. S., Almeida, P. C. (2017). Violence obstetric in the parturition process in maternities linked to the Stork Network. Reprod Clim., 32(2), 78-84, 2019. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413208716300723
Sadler, M., Santos, M., Ruiz-Berdún, D., Rojas, Gl, Skoko, E., Gillen, P., Clausen, J. (2016). Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters, 24, 47–55, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002
Santiago, R. V., Monreal, L. A., Rojas Carmona, A., Domínguez, M. S. (2018). If we’re here, it’s only because we have no money… discrimination and violence in Mexican maternity wards. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18(1):244, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1897-8
Savage, V., Castro, A. (2017). Measuring mistreatment of women during childbirth: a review of terminology and methodological approaches. Reprod Health, 14(1), 138, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0403-5
Shabot S. C. (2016). Making loud bodies “feminine”: a feminist-phenomenological analysis of obstetric violence. Hum Stud, 39(2), 231-247, 2016. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-015-9369-x
Sheferaw ED, Kim YM, van den Akker T, Stekelenburg J. Mistreatment of women in public health facilities of Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):130.
Shrivastava S, Sivakami M. (2020). Evidence of ‘obstetric violence’in India: an integrative review. J Biosoc Sci., 52(4):610–628, 2020. doi: 10.1017/S0021932019000695
Silva, R. L. V., Lucena, K. D. T., Deininger, L. S. C., Martins, V. S., Monteiro, A. C. C., Moura, R. M. A. (2016). Obstetrical violence under the look of users. Rev Enferm UFPE, 10(12), 4474-4480, 2016. http://www.revista.ufpe.br/revistaenfermagem/index.php/revista/article/view/9982/pdf_1791
Silveira, M.F., Mesenburg, M.A., Bertoldi, A.D., Mola, C.L., Bassani, D.G., Domingues, M.R., Stein, A., Coll, C. V. N. (2019). The association between disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth and postpartum depression: findings from the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort study. J Affect Disord; 256:441–7, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.016
Simonovic, D., Women, U., Secretary-General, U. (2019). A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence: note / by the Secretary-General, UN; 2019. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/127145/a-human-rights-based-approach-to-mistreatment-and-violence-against-women-in-reproductive-health-services-with-a-focus-on-childbirth-and-obstetric-violence/
Simonovic, D. (2019). Uma abordagem baseada em direitos humanos para maus-tratos e violência contra mulheres em serviços de saúde reprodutiva com foco no parto e violência obstétrica. Nações Unidas: Nova York, NY, EUA, 2019. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3823698#record-files-collapse-header
Terán, P., Castellanos, C., Blanco, M. G., Ramos, D. (2013). Violencia obstétrica: percepción de las usuarias. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Venezuela, 73(3),171-180, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0048-77322013000300004. Acesso em 21 de jun. 2022.
Tomasi, E., Fernandes, P.A.A., Fischer, T., Siqueira, F.C.V., Silveira, D.S., Thumé, E., Duro, S. M. S., Saes, M. O., Nunes,B. P., Fassa, A. C. G., Facchini L. A. (2017). Quality of prenatal services in primary healthcare in Brazil: indicators and social inequalities. Cad Saude Pública, 33: e00195815, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00195815
UNICEF and Tulane University, Health equity report (2016). Analysis of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health inequities in Latin America and the Caribbean to inform policymaking. 2016, Panama: UNICEF 160. https://www.unicef.org/lac/media/386/file/Publication.pdf
Vacaflor, C. H. (2016). Obstetric violence: a new framework for identifying challenges to maternal healthcare in Argentina. Reprod Health Matters, 24(47), 65-73, 2016. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.05.001
Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, McLemore M, Cadena M, Nethery, E., Rushton, E., Schummers, L., Declercq, E., GVtM-US Steering Council. (2019). The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health, 16(1):77, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2
Venturi, G., Godinho, T. (2013). Mulheres brasileiras e gênero nos espaços público e privado: uma década de mudanças na opinião pública. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, SESC-SP, 2013. https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/EspacoAcademico/article/view/22393/11910
Vogel, J. P., Bohren, M. A., Tunçalp, Ö, Oladapo, O. T., Adanu, R. M., Baldé, M. D., Maung, T. M., Fawole, B., Adu-Bonsaffoh, K., Dako-Gyeke, P., Maya, E. T., Camara, M. C., Diallo, A. B., Diallo, S., Wai, K. T., Myint, T., Olutayo, L., Titiloye, M., Alu, F., Idris, H., Gülmezoglu, M. A.; Who Research Group On The Treatment Of Women During Childbirth. (2015). How Women Are Treated During Facility-Based Childbirth: Development And Validation Of Measurement Tools In Four Countries - Phase 1 Formative Research Study Protocol. Reprod Health, v.22;12:60, 2015. DOI: 10.1186/S12978-015-0047-2.
World Health Organization – WHO (2014). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: WHO; 2014a. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-14.23.
World Health Organization – WHO. (2016) recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
World Health Organization - WHO. (2014). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. World Health Organization, 2014b. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/134588
Zaami, S., Stark, M., Beck, R., Malvasi, A., Marinelli, E. (2019). Does episiotomy always equate violence in obstetrics? Routine and selective episiotomy in obstetric practice and legal questions. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 23(5):1847-1854, 2019. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17219
Zanardo, G. L. P., Uribe, M. C., Nadal, A. H. R., Habigzang, L. F. (2017). Violência obstétrica no Brasil: uma revisão narrativa. Psicologia & Sociedade, 29, 1-11, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2017v29155043
Zanon, L. O., Rangel, T. L. V. (2019). Análise jurídica da violência obstétrica como instrumento de conformação e Dominação do feminino. Jornal Jurid. São Paulo, 2019. https://www.jornaljurid.com.br/doutrina/civil/analisejuridica-da-violencia-obstetrica-como-instrumento-de-conformacao-e-dominacao-dofeminino
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Júlia Carla Oliveira Silva; Letícia Maria Cavalcanti Brito; Eloisa Simões Alves; José Bandeira de Medeiros Neto; José Ledesvan Pereira dos Santos Junior; Nielson Mendes Marques; Thalisson Max de Oliveira Lopes; José de Almeida Alexandre; Luciano Jose Ramos Pimentel Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
